Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek
Do any of those not overlap with the current south terminal?
Maybe we should just build a different one to start, and let the lease run out.
|
I've been wondering about that lately myself. It's a long lease, but it may be doable to work around it, even if not preferable. Based on the image on Slide 24, it seems that what I'll call Terminals 2 & 3 could be built at least to the east (top of image in its current orientation) and later expanded to the west (bottom). Terminal 4 may not be doable without resolving the traffic flow into the current South Terminal. Granted, this would be a huge undertaking to have essentially two half-terminals built, but at least the underground connector would be there for future expansions.
That said, it may be easier to just pay them off and move on. It was a dumb contract. But I don't envy those who have to make the decisions on how to proceed with anticipated growth and resolving this major past mistake.
That is cool to see the parallel layout. I'm glad to see them thinking more than ~10 years down the road and having to constantly play catch up.