HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 7:06 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Why did the Annex decline while Rosedale stayed wealthy?

In 1900, the Annex was probably Toronto's most elite neighborhood. It was certainly marketed as an upmarket community.

But in the 1920s it saw "rich flight" as many moved "up the hill." In the depression and postwar years, it was kind of of an old bourgeois neighborhood down on its luck. Of course in recent decades it has re-emerged as a desirable central city neighborhood but still retains a socioeconomic mix.

Rosedale is thought of as the same era as the Annex, but it didn't decline. It was high income even in 1960.

My guess: Rosedale was developed as a more homogeneous community (and there was more geographic sorting by class by the turn of the 20th century) and it was more contained from the city center due to the geography of the Rosedale Valley. Rosedale may be close to Yonge and Bloor, but its orientation and feel seems more "North Toronto" than "downtown." While the Annex orientation is more to downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 7:11 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ I have no particular insight to share regarding those neighbourhoods specifically, but I do find it fascinating in general how neighbourhoods move up and down the socioeconomic ladder through the years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 7:25 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Toronto Social Register sample (1921):

Rosedale 26%
Annex 21%
Hill District 13%
Deer Park 6%

So two-thirds live in the area north of Bloor, east of Bathurst and south of St. Clair. The movement north of St. Clair really took off over the next decade.
The favored quarter map of today is already in place.

The rich were already pretty much gone from Jarvis/Sherbourne and Parkdale.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 7:34 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,874
Rosedale was always the premier area. The quality of the original housing stock is definitely a step or two above that of the Annex. Aside from some of the other reasons you've mentioned, there was simply more wealth established there and the housing was inherently more desirable.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 7:39 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Within the Cordillera
Posts: 12,493
This is not National. Wrong section.
Mods please move to the Toronto section.
__________________
Castlegar BC: SSP's hottest city (43.9C)
Lytton BC: Canada’s hottest city (49.6C)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 8:44 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by denscity View Post
this is not national. Wrong section.
Mods please move to the toronto section.
+1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 9:02 PM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ Empirically Canadian
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 11,934
Perhaps you could find comparisons in various Canadian cities. A comparison in Vancouver might be why the West End declined, but Shaughnessy didn't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 9:06 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
I'm open to that.

The West End was to Vancouver what Jarvis St. is to Toronto and the Golden Square Mile was to Montreal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 9:41 PM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ Empirically Canadian
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 11,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Docere View Post
I'm open to that.

The West End was to Vancouver what Jarvis St. is to Toronto and the Golden Square Mile was to Montreal.
The West End was originally a more upscale residential area, which included mansions of the day. The West End is still a residential area, and dates from 1886, but it's primarily from after 1900. Shaughnessy, a garden suburb, about 2 km to the South, dates from 1907, so is almost as old. It overtook the WE as the more prestigious area, and the West End declined as a result, even though the West end was and still is, more valuable in terms of location.

Quote:
In 1907, Richard Marpole, general superintendent and executive assistant of the CPR, proposed development of an exclusive and prestigious residential area that would lure the city's elite from the West End. ...

By 1914, there were 243 houses in Shaughnessy and 80 per cent of the homeowners were listed on Vancouver's social register. The area's appeal was so great that the CPR developed adjacent land as "Second Shaughnessy" and "Third Shaughnessy." The CPR took great pains to protect Shaughnessy's exclusive character, and the value of its lots.
https://vancouver.ca/news-calendar/shaughnessy.aspx
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 9:49 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
There's a big shift to the "garden suburb" by WWI.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 9:55 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Toronto Social Register (1902):

Annex 19%
Jarvis/Sherbourne 9%
Rosedale 7%
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 10:43 PM
Hali87 Hali87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,465
I vote to allow it in this section (not that we vote on things lol)

I don't live in Toronto, never have, never intend to, and still find this interesting, but don't have a ton of time for SSP, definitely not enough to ever delve into regional subforums other than Atlantic. So if it were not in the Canada section I would never see it otherwise.

I'm not just saying it because it's Toronto; if it were two neighbourhoods in Montreal, or Vancouver, or Edmonton, or [whatever city] that are well-known across the country then I don't see the harm in it being in the Canada section. If someone had a legitimate question about "Why is Point Grey like this but Kerrisdale is like that" (or even "why is Vancouver like this but Victoria is like that"), that they wanted to crowdsource an answer to, I'd be interested in seeing that thread.

Does having a thread like this in the Canada section cause any real functional problems or is it more that people are annoyed that they have to see a thread title that they don't care about?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 25, 2023, 10:49 PM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Certainly the discussion can be national in scope.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 26, 2023, 12:15 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 22,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Architype View Post
Perhaps you could find comparisons in various Canadian cities. A comparison in Vancouver might be why the West End declined, but Shaughnessy didn't.
Shaughnessy had all the might of its developer, the CPR, behind it. It was established in 1907 when streetcars had recently liberated people from living near the office and the motorcar was just being taken up by the well to do. Hemmed in on the downtown peninsula the West End was getting more crowded and Shaughnessy offered a chance to escape that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 26, 2023, 12:47 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ Empirically Canadian
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 11,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Shaughnessy had all the might of its developer, the CPR, behind it. It was established in 1907 when streetcars had recently liberated people from living near the office and the motorcar was just being taken up by the well to do. Hemmed in on the downtown peninsula the West End was getting more crowded and Shaughnessy offered a chance to escape that.
The railways had a lot of influence over development in Western Canadian cities (I included that in my quote too). It turns out the West End would have been a better long term investment for profit, seeing how it is now the residential heart of the city. It's also more geographically advantaged than Shaughnessy, being adjacent to the beaches, Stanley Park, and downtown. Shaughnessy afforded more gentrified and auto-friendly living given it's large lots and beautifully designed street layout, and was comfortably far enough away from the more industrial downtown area. It's probably the best bastion of elite Nimbyism in the city. The East End is older than the West End, but has suffered a different fate.

I am not familiar enough with Toronto to make any further comparisons.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 26, 2023, 1:00 AM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
When Shaughnessy was being built up, it wasn't part of the city of Vancouver yet. It was part of the municipality of Point Grey. In 1929, Vancouver established its modern-day boundaries when it annexed affluent Point Grey and the more working class South Vancouver south of 16th. I think Cambie was the boundary between South Vancouver and Point Grey.

I believe there was also a move to have Shaughnessy be a municipality, but the efforts to do that were thwarted. But it got some special zoning rights and protections in return.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 26, 2023, 1:14 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ Empirically Canadian
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 11,934
This map doesn't show if Cambie Street was a boundary, as this map only shows Vancouver, where 16th Ave. was the main part of the southern boundary. Shaughnessy is just to the South on this 1915 map, where it says "Vancouver". Shaughnessy is not the oldest suburb, that would be Mt. Pleasant where I live today, the gravitational centre of the map, which was always part of the city.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 26, 2023, 1:33 AM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
"Exclusive municipalities" are pretty rare in Canada, unlike in the US where a lot of old-line establishmentarian suburbs remained independent.

Montreal is the main exception, where Westmount is (and remains) the most prestigious community, though it feels more like an affluent intown neighborhood. It grew quickly in the early 20th century. Mount Royal and Hampstead were incorporated around WWI, but took a long time to develop and were mostly built up in the postwar years.

Forest Hill (incorporated in 1923, annexed by the city of Toronto in 1967) was a "Westmount" that later got subsumed into the city. Rosedale and Lawrence Park were built up after these areas were annexed by Toronto.

Shaughnessy, as mentioned, was thwarted in its attempts to become a municipality. Though West Vancouver (a post-war suburb, I'm not sure if it was already wealthy before the Lions Gate Bridge was built or more of a small town) still remains independent.

Winnipeg had Tuxedo, but it was tiny and is mostly post-war housing (and amalgamated into Winnipeg in the early 1970s).

Last edited by Docere; May 26, 2023 at 2:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 26, 2023, 1:52 AM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 19,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Docere View Post

Winnipeg had Tuxedo, but it was tiny and is mostly post-war housing (and amalgamated into Winnipeg in the early 1970s).
I might throw in Armstrong's Point and Kingston Row for Winnipeg.
__________________
Can I help you?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 26, 2023, 6:15 AM
Docere Docere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
Were they ever independent municipalities?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:17 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.