HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #761  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2022, 7:25 PM
xymox xymox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
If nothing else the plan includes $200m in bonds/tax breaks on which all Tempe residents should have a say.
How did Tempe not learn from Glendale about doing business with the team? They're going to wind up in the same spot in about 10 years...
__________________
mmmm skyscraper, I love you....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #762  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2022, 9:57 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
I didn't realize they were also issuing bonds, which are a terrible idea for a private project. Cities only have so much bonding capacity and it's foolish to tie it up for this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xymox View Post
How did Tempe not learn from Glendale about doing business with the team? They're going to wind up in the same spot in about 10 years...
Yeah, are the basic details: https://www.coyotesintempe.com/the-details

Glass half full version is that they're spending $200m to clean up a city landfill to make it developable land, and the bonds are being repaid from tax/parking revenues from the entertainment district, so no increase in property taxes to repay the bonds. Unlike Glendale, the team will otherwise privately finance and build the arena, leaving the City less tied to the team long term, other than owning a parking garage in the project.

Opinions about whether the City should be contributing even $200m to a proposed $2.1b project, however, and whether the City should be giving away tax revenue to repay those bonds given that at least some of spending at the entertainment district will be drawn away from other parts of the city, will vary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #763  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2022, 1:23 AM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by locolife View Post
I’m in north Tempe and it’s a yes vote for me.
Very good! Please let tell everyone to says yes. Let them vote!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #764  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2022, 2:09 PM
locolife locolife is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
Yeah, are the basic details: https://www.coyotesintempe.com/the-details

Glass half full version is that they're spending $200m to clean up a city landfill to make it developable land, and the bonds are being repaid from tax/parking revenues from the entertainment district, so no increase in property taxes to repay the bonds. Unlike Glendale, the team will otherwise privately finance and build the arena, leaving the City less tied to the team long term, other than owning a parking garage in the project.

Opinions about whether the City should be contributing even $200m to a proposed $2.1b project, however, and whether the City should be giving away tax revenue to repay those bonds given that at least some of spending at the entertainment district will be drawn away from other parts of the city, will vary.
I don’t think much spending at this venue will be drawn away from other parts of Tempe. There’s no other large indoor venue in Tempe which this will draw non-hockey events from but there could be some retail sales drawn from Tempe marketplace I suppose. What else are you thinking?

What development examples are out there which required remediation of a current landfill site without any support from the city to do so?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #765  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2022, 3:29 PM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, California
Posts: 7,201
IIRC, Tempe Marketplace was privately funded and that was built on a remediated landfill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #766  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2022, 4:19 PM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
IIRC, Tempe Marketplace was privately funded and that was built on a remediated landfill.
It was a superfund site though, so it got all that Federal bacon to clean it up
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #767  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2022, 4:34 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,286
Sky Harbor changes tune on Tempe Coyotes project after months of airport pushback

They say this now but expect them to mail out hundreds of thousands of mailers to Tempe residents to encourage them to vote "No".

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...t/69693085007/

Quote:
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport has all but reversed its position opposing Tempe's $2.1 billion development deal with the Arizona Coyotes, an unexpected move that suggests the project's most outspoken opponent has thrown-in the towel on its yearlong effort to kill the plan.

The airport's change of heart coincided with the Tempe City Council's call for a special election last week that lets voters decide whether the Coyotes proposal gets approved. The deal involves building nearly 2,000 apartments, a hockey arena and an entertainment district on 46 acres of Tempe-owned land west of Town Lake.

The planned apartments have been in the airport's crosshairs since shortly after the project came to light last year. Sky Harbor has been steadfast in its contention that the project would violate a 1994 agreement between Phoenix and Tempe that dictates how close housing can be to the airport. Sky Harbor's pushback has been relentless.

Airport officials have appeared at multiple Tempe City Council meetings to speak against the development and even threatened to sue Tempe in May. In October, they sent flyers to 100,000 homes across the East Valley warning residents that the project could necessitate new flight paths and trigger loud plane noise over their neighborhoods.

But all of that seemed to be a distant memory at last Tuesday's meeting when Sky Harbor official Chad Makovsky instead wished the city good luck moving forward, a strong indication that the project's last major opponent is backing off.

Tempe officials also voiced unanimous support for the project, which leaves the Coyotes with only one last hurdle to jump before the deal goes through: securing a "yes" vote during the May 16 special election.
"A positive and productive relationship between Tempe, Sky Harbor and the City of Phoenix has been and continues to be incredibly important to us," he said. "I wish you the best as you make this important decision for your community."

The airport's about face was driven by the recent inclusion of an "indemnification" provision in the Coyotes' proposal, according to Makovsky. It essentially requires the NHL franchise to defend the airport in court against any excessive plane noise lawsuits filed by new residents on the site, which sits only a couple of miles from Sky Harbor. It's also within the area's high-noise zone where the 1994 agreement, also called an IGA, restricts certain types of housing development.

The Coyotes also made some smaller concessions throughout the past year. They included an "avigation easement" that will lessen restrictions on planes flying low over private property, for example, and agreed to participate in consultations with the airport over crane height during construction.

"At the end of the day, there was some additional language that was agreed to within the agreement, which was negotiated between Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport and (the developer). That was not about the City of Tempe, but kind of a mutual agreement between those two parties," Tempe Mayor Corey Woods said, adding that he doesn't expect that Sky Harbor will continue trying to kill the deal. The airport's assertion that apartments aren't allowed under the IGA is also a stretch, given that the rules don't clearly spell that out. It's possible Sky Harbor wanted to cow Tempe with legal threats rather than actually sue the city using that argument, and when that didn't work, the aviation department just had to get on board with the project. The Arizona Republic previously reported that the IGA appears to make an exception for sound-proofed apartments, like the ones included in the Coyotes' proposal, and a 1999 letter between the mayors of Tempe and Phoenix confirmed that interpretation.

Unearthed records also showed Phoenix previously supported a high-noise project in Tempe with housing and didn't raise an issue when 400 units were built in that area.

Sky Harbor officials still contend that the IGA does permit apartments, however. Makovsky said the exact meaning of the 1994 policy is one of the issues that still needs to be ironed-out, along with an agreement that Tempe will continue to support airport expansion even if the Coyotes' future tenants get fed-up with the loud noise. Makovsky said Sky Harbor cannot support the Coyotes development because the airport views it as "incompatible land use" under the rules, but added that he will not "wholeheartedly oppose" the project as long as the other protections are in place moving forward.

"As it goes to the vote, we're going to work with both the developer and with the City of Tempe to make sure that the commitments that were made actually come to fruition," he said. "Provided they do, we don't intend to wholeheartedly oppose this development."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #768  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2022, 4:42 PM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU Diablo View Post
They say this now but expect them to mail out hundreds of thousands of mailers to Tempe residents to encourage them to vote "No".

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...t/69693085007/
That’s factual information. You don’t have right information. All Tempe residents have it right. They says yes. Let them vote. Please says yes to Arizona Coyotes arena.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #769  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2022, 5:30 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by N830MH View Post
That’s factual information. You don’t have right information. All Tempe residents have it right. They says yes. Let them vote. Please says yes to Arizona Coyotes arena.
I think you misunderstood Diablo's sarcasm in his comment.
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #770  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2022, 4:17 AM
LocoPhoenician LocoPhoenician is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by N830MH View Post
That’s factual information. You don’t have right information. All Tempe residents have it right. They says yes. Let them vote. Please says yes to Arizona Coyotes arena.
No as someone who lives in the neighborhood we will be voting No! The area has no business next to a residential neighborhood. Build it McClintock and Rio Salado or down by ikea!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #771  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2022, 9:21 PM
stutteringpunk stutteringpunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocoPhoenician View Post
No as someone who lives in the neighborhood we will be voting No! The area has no business next to a residential neighborhood. Build it McClintock and Rio Salado or down by ikea!
They tried. ASU backed out of that proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #772  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2022, 1:28 AM
DUPio DUPio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: PHX
Posts: 98
. Accidental
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #773  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2022, 9:37 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,398
Phoenix Rising Stadium

Here's a traffic markup of the proposed Phoenix Rising Stadium at the old Greyhound site on Washington. No real renderings, but gives you an idea of what we can expect. Looks like they are going for a much larger capacity at 9,035 (including ADA)

View traffic markup here on my Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q9U...ew?usp=sharing


__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #774  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2023, 6:34 PM
MiEncanto MiEncanto is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
IIRC, Tempe Marketplace was privately funded and that was built on a remediated landfill.
Tempe marketplace also got an 8 year abatement on every building plus a 25 year in total GPLET (prop tax break).

I'm not aware of any major project in Tempe that didn't get a deal... so if you're made about City of Tempe getting deals, you should start with literally everyone else. Hell State Farm got a 100 year sweetheart deal from ASU where they pay next to nothing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #775  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2023, 11:00 PM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,983
You can vote for sports, entertainment. It's up to voters. Please vote yes!

https://www.azfamily.com/2023/01/11/...nment-complex/

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613262946716770304

Tempe releases 3 special ballot propositions for voters to decide on sports, entertainment complex
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #776  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2023, 6:31 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,398
Phoenix Rising Stadium

Didn't realize the new Rising stadium had already started construction off Washington. Looks like they are around 70% or so complete with the stadium.

Here's some pics I grabbed:





__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #777  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2023, 11:44 PM
KEVINphx's Avatar
KEVINphx KEVINphx is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrestedSaguaro View Post
Didn't realize the new Rising stadium had already started construction off Washington. Looks like they are around 70% or so complete with the stadium.

Here's some pics I grabbed:





LOL A stretch to call this a "stadium" by any means of the imagination

Looks like the same temporary looking stuff they have at the reservation
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #778  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2023, 12:56 AM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,398
It's a pop-up stadium such as the previous 2 stadiums were. This one has a larger seating capacity than the previous 2 stadiums. I'm sure once the bleachers are complete, they will add some nice cladding around the structure.
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #779  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2023, 2:59 AM
phoenixwillrise phoenixwillrise is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 480
The Soccer Team Owner

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrestedSaguaro View Post
It's a pop-up stadium such as the previous 2 stadiums were. This one has a larger seating capacity than the previous 2 stadiums. I'm sure once the bleachers are complete, they will add some nice cladding around the structure.
Wish this guy was a big bopper who could afford to build his own 25k seat Dome downtown or at this same site and bring in Big League Soccer. Maybe if the D'Backs abandon Chase Field they could hopefully find some big bopper who could totally rehab Chase with a hotel and office and shops and new roof and play Major League soccer there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #780  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2023, 2:46 PM
locolife locolife is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 510
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixwillrise View Post
Wish this guy was a big bopper who could afford to build his own 25k seat Dome downtown or at this same site and bring in Big League Soccer. Maybe if the D'Backs abandon Chase Field they could hopefully find some big bopper who could totally rehab Chase with a hotel and office and shops and new roof and play Major League soccer there.
Abandon it? I don't see that happening, I think it's going the Footprint center route based on discussions with Ken Kendrick on sports radio.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.