I read a lot of the reviews on Stewart after I posted the article. Most of the reviews are fairly positive, but there are some that pretty much point out the problems that the article addresses...specifically on Yelp. As for the occupancy, I researched that a few months ago and was fairly certain it had a fairly high occupancy with only a little over a dozen units available. Of course, if 2 floors are reserved for Airnbn units, that could skew the numbers quite a bit.
But I do feel like there was a little bit of bias in the article considering it brings up a lot of the flack that the developers got for demolishing most of the building. I feel the author was probably part of that crowd. I don't follow New Times much, but wanted to post the article as a different perspective. I would still live there