HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2021, 8:23 AM
Darkoshvilli Darkoshvilli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbermingham123 View Post
Just read through this thread for the first time... Nothing too surprising; the only thing that really surprised me is the fact that Darkoshvilli is Canadian! I guess there are exceptions to every stereotype
You have no idea dude. Im a moody fuck.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2021, 3:34 PM
afonega1's Avatar
afonega1 afonega1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
^ speaking as an American, from our perspective, Canada will always be the kids table, for better or worse.

You don't become the most navel-gazing society in the history of our species by recognizing things beyond your borders.
lol
"navel gazing"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2021, 4:23 PM
afonega1's Avatar
afonega1 afonega1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camelback View Post
Top 15 metros, ranked by population. The percentage is the population change from 2010 to 2020.

New York City -- +1.20%
Los Angeles -- +2.19%
Chicago -- −0.58%
Dallas -- +20.85%
Houston -- +20.84%
Washington -- +11.95%
Miami -- +10.93%
Philadelphia -- +2.39%
Atlanta -- +15.15%
Phoenix -- +20.68%
Boston -- +7.16%
San Francisco -- +8.34%
Riverside -- +10.73%
Detroit -- +0.18%
Seattle -- +16.83%

Red = Under 2% growth
Magenta = 2% - 9.99% growth
Blue = 10% - 19.99%
Green = 20%+

The high growth metros are "building the most".
This really doesnt accurately show which cities are growing the most.

Phoenix,Houston,Dallas all are in the highest growth margin but all of them are more than twice and big land wise as Seattle,DC,Atlanta, SF, and Boston.

For instance if you look at Atlanta city boundaries and extended then as much as Houstons it would go well into Dunwoody,Sandy Springs,and as far as Alpharetta in the suburbs.
Even if you consider just the inner loop of Houston,a significant portion of developments are still outside the Western loop. Post Oak area and beyond
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2021, 6:09 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,032
Read the post. It's about metros. This isn't about city limits.

BTW, in Seattle's case, 16.83% is far less than the core city grew, which is estimated at 25%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2021, 8:00 PM
afonega1's Avatar
afonega1 afonega1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
Read the post. It's about metros. This isn't about city limits.

BTW, in Seattle's case, 16.83% is far less than the core city grew, which is estimated at 25%.
I did read the post.
I quoted that post because they were referring to the Emporis data that only list city propers in regards to developments.
I wasnt focusing on the population

He should have used population data for the city propers instead for the proper context.
Notice i said "developments"
https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...2&postcount=12
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2021, 11:53 PM
Razor Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
You don't become the most navel-gazing society in the history of our species by recognizing things beyond your borders.
Elaborate please, unless you made a typo. It sounds contradictory.

re: kids table..It's funny and kinda true in some respects, but Canada is also a G7 country, so I guess it sits at the adult table sometimes.

re: Native American terminology. I watched a Joe Rogan podcast less than a year ago, and his guest was an indigenous lawyer of sorts. She consistently referred to parts of Oklahoma as "Indian lands", and referred to treaties as "Indian treaties",,She actually used the word "Indian" quite bit when she referred to her people(s)..Before the podcast aired, I actually thought that Americans in general still used "Indians" for Indigenous people tbh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 2:21 AM
Northern Light Northern Light is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor View Post
Elaborate please, unless you made a typo. It sounds contradictory.
Steely can speak for himself......

But I don't see anything contradictory there.

He's saying that the U.S. is a navel-gazing country.

That's the same as saying inward-looking or self-absorbed depending on how harsh you want it to sound.

Then he's saying you don't become that way by considering others beyond your borders.......... which would be entirely logical.
__________________
An environmentally conscientious, libertarian inclined, fiscally conservative, socialist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 1:14 PM
Razor Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Light View Post
Steely can speak for himself......

But I don't see anything contradictory there.

He's saying that the U.S. is a navel-gazing country.

That's the same as saying inward-looking or self-absorbed depending on how harsh you want it to sound.

Then he's saying you don't become that way by considering others beyond your borders.......... which would be entirely logical.

Ahh you know what..You are correct! I've always took the term "navel gazing " as something else..The complete opposite of the true meaning..The things you learn daily..Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 2:27 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,149
I'm not sure I still like Toronto constructing so many tall buildings. Sure, they look nice, but those elevators can be annoying to use, and maybe too crowded, especially during a pandemic. And I also have to wonder how increasing reliance on elevators fits into Canada's climate change goals. I think we can increase density without building exclusively ever taller and skinnier towers. For example, is Toronto really that much denser than Montreal? I think Toronto should take some inspiration from Montreal and all its dense low-rise and mid-rise neighbourhoods. Toronto new buildings are shinier, but Montreal's might be more livable, and also more sustainable in the long-term.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 3:29 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,032
Are you suggesting a wholesale rebuild of Toronto's houses as townhouses and walk-ups? How's that going to work?

Towers work because you don't need to tear much down to provide enough room for them.

Elevators must have a miniscule effect on climate vs. the transportation impacts of not being dense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 4:44 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,181
Apparently Doady is into satire? Obviously Montreal started out much denser, but most new density there is also concentrated in towers in very constrained sites like Toronto/Vancouver rather than spread out.

Back to thread topic... many people might be unaware of Burnaby aka the continent's biggest collection of suburban skylines in a single suburb, now with more towers above 150m than downtown, and about to have 7 of the 8 tallest buildings in Metro Vancouver. 23 towers under construction, with 12 of the 20 tallest buildings under construction in the metro (only 5 are downtown)

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 4:45 PM
suburbanite's Avatar
suburbanite suburbanite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Toronto & NYC
Posts: 4,602
I've heard a lot of arguments against building too many high-rise residential towers. The environmental impact of elevators is a new one though.
__________________
Discontented suburbanite since 1994
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 5:24 PM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is online now
Birds Aren't Real!
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Apparently Doady is into satire? Obviously Montreal started out much denser, but most new density there is also concentrated in towers in very constrained sites like Toronto/Vancouver rather than spread out.

Back to thread topic... many people might be unaware of Burnaby aka the continent's biggest collection of suburban skylines in a single suburb, now with more towers above 150m than downtown, and about to have 7 of the 8 tallest buildings in Metro Vancouver. 23 towers under construction, with 12 of the 20 tallest buildings under construction in the metro (only 5 are downtown)
Why aren't most of the tallest towers in metro Vancouver downtown?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 5:28 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigs View Post
Why aren't most of the tallest towers in metro Vancouver downtown?
downtown has a height limit.

It's the same thing for Ottawa, and possibly soon for Hamilton. All these cities have relatively low height limits so the tallest buildings are in the suburbs where there are no such limits.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 6:21 PM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is online now
Birds Aren't Real!
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
downtown has a height limit.
Right, but why?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 6:23 PM
afonega1's Avatar
afonega1 afonega1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
downtown has a height limit.

It's the same thing for Ottawa, and possibly soon for Hamilton. All these cities have relatively low height limits so the tallest buildings are in the suburbs where there are no such limits.
Do you know what is the reasoning behind the height restrictions? I know why they have them in DC so I assume its the same reason for Ottawa but why Hamilton and other cities?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 7:50 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,032
My area has height limits basically everywhere. Even the tiny area without them has tight FAR limits. The limits are very tight given our growth pressures. So nearly all projects go to the precise limit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 7:51 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 9,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by afonega1 View Post
Do you know what is the reasoning behind the height restrictions? I know why they have them in DC so I assume its the same reason for Ottawa but why Hamilton and other cities?
A shocking number of Canadian cities actually have height limits. Montreal is limited to the height of Mount Royal adjacent, Hamilton is limited to the height of the Niagara Escarpment adjacent (this is a new rule however and there are several existing buildings which exceed the limit), and Ottawa is limited to the height of the Peace Tower on the Parliament Buildings. Not sure what the rationale is for Vancouver's height limit is, but it's about 200 metres in height as the absolute maximum from what I recall.

there isn't any real clear rationale for the limits often, just a visual preference by municipal planners.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 7:53 PM
UrbanImpact's Avatar
UrbanImpact UrbanImpact is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by afonega1 View Post
Do you know what is the reasoning behind the height restrictions? I know why they have them in DC so I assume its the same reason for Ottawa but why Hamilton and other cities?
Vancouver's height limit is to protect mountain views.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 8:08 PM
Urbanguy's Avatar
Urbanguy Urbanguy is offline
Go Beavs! Go Niners!
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland | Honolulu
Posts: 6,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanImpact View Post
Vancouver's height limit is to protect mountain views.
^That's very similar to Honolulu's -- to protect the mountain views and the ocean views as well as Diamond Head Crater (I believe).
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:56 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.