Quote:
Originally Posted by Xelebes
My comment is only limited to works of art where the only means of interaction is to zip by it. Parks can work provided that there are connections to it and such. Then any such public art put there could be primarily enjoyed by those strolling through it.
|
The problem with the inaccessible pieces is that unless they fit into the landscape and/or infrastructure extremely well most people think they are a waste of money. A park with art in it (or without as far as I'm concerned) would be much better. And of course the park would be accessible otherwise we'd be back to the same problem.
Threaded Mode