Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina Boi
Lots of debate here regarding the proposed Gondola. Obviously I could be completely wrong on this, but personally I was glad to see some councilors vote no for the Gondola proposal. Regardless what you do to "beautify it" It is going to be ugly. Huge poles and cables will do absolutely nothing for the aesthetic of the river valley. Secondly, I feel it will be a novelty for the first couple of years, and then ridership will die off. It will eventually become unprofitable, and it will sit there rusting for years until the city finally decides what to do with it.
The city would be much better off trying to create a private/public partnership to build a pedestrian/bike bridge, which fits much better with the city's branding. It could contain entertainment and park spaces, and even a café of some type.
I would love to see something similar to below
|
Huh? I have almost no idea what you are getting at here. A novelty that will eventually become unprofitable that will sit rusted for years until the city does something with it? What is your basis for this "feeling"? The purpose of this is it is a privately run gondola that has presented a business plan to the city that will also link with ETS to transport transit riders across the river valley as another option instead of taking the bus, for example. Additionally, with development in areas such as the Rossdale power plant, people can take the gondola to what will be home to a brewery, cafes, etc. in the hopefully not so distant future.
To propose that the city, which has nothing to do with the development and operations of the gondola, instead work to build a pedestrian bike bridge has almost nothing at all to do the gondola itself. Is the city suppose to build a pedestrian transit bridge that spans from Whyte ave to the Mac, the same distance as the gondola? Now the city is to be spending money on a bridge even though with the gondola the city is not spending any. You also do realize the city just built a pedestrian cycling bridge, the Walterdale, that is heavily used and enjoyed that fits very well with the city's branding?
I realize my response is heavy handed but your baseless post with almost no thought or research in it while proposing the city partner to build something it just built in the same spot as the intended gondola that is very much enjoyed is the exact type of thinking (or not thinking) that shoots down great ideas like the gondola. Holy smokes Mike Nickel is that you?