Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesrmj
I thought the people fleeing the Bay Area that stay in California are going to Sacramento. Los Angeles (while not San Francisco expensive) is still very expensive.
I honestly think the whole Southern US (Sunbelt) is very overrated, and I don't understand why so many people like it. Boring nature and landscapes, no "real" cities, most vulnerable to climate change, way too hot and humid in the summer, and I think every other area in the country offers something much better in every category. The only pro I see is that it's cheaper, but is it really worth it when it will either be too hot or underwater in the somewhat near future. And to live in the suburban sprawl messes with no zoning laws they call cities down there. No thanks, I would rather live in a real world class city like Chicago, NYC, PHL, etc. Then again, that's just my opinion and I clearly am not in the majority.
|
Because most people are boring?
I think I could live in Atlanta, Austin, Charleston, Miami, or Richmond. For different reasons. Some would have more staying power than others. But all in all, I prefer NYC or Philly.
Also. Nashville is the most overrated city in this country by a bazillion miles.
There is literally almost nothing to do there. No meaningful cultural venues or museums. No transit. Mediocre restaurants. Worse shopping. Not walkable. Worse than all of the above (but not totally unrelated), the Southern Baptists are sort of the cultural elite in Nashville.
The only thing I like about Nashville is that the architectural vernacular even in middle brow areas is really nice and it is very green and has a lovely, rolling topography.