Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambridgite
If the service takes as long or longer than driving, how many people will ride the train? ... Keep in mind, this even assumes the travel times are competitive, which is the #1 issue with extending the lines to Kitchener and Cambridge.
|
I don't mean to single you out, but I call bullshit on this kind of argument in general. While I agree that travel time is important, I'm not convinced of parity as a magical cut off point. The travel time is very important, but it isn't the only factor when you're commuting. An hour actively driving in 401 traffic is a very different experience than the same amount of time in a GO train. Parity of cost/benefit ratios for many might well make a 1.5 hour train ride the equal of an hour drive.
Cars are not free, either. Some commuters might be able to give up one car (in a two-person household) if they can go by train when needed; they might even be able to switch over to
car-sharing and transit locally if they don't need their car for the commute. Not that commuting by train has to be all-or-nothing. For some it could be a backup -- for when their car might be in the shop, or when they just can't take any more 401 traffic that week and need some more sleep. Of course, occasional use is a great back door to getting more people exposed to the mode as a viable means of transportation.
There's also another kind of commuting use, which is to allow people who have no interest in commuting by car to take a job in, say, Waterloo that might involve going once a week to another office in, perhaps, Toronto.