HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7841  
Old Posted Today, 6:17 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 11,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
Yes, Wab could be a serious threat to them. The stars could be aligning for the complete and permanent demise of the Liberal Party of Canada.

Wouldn't that be a wonderful legacy for JT - to destroy your own party...........
People said that in 2011, and they came back in 2015. That said, part of me thinks that the LPC's apparent revival in 2015 was really just their "last hurrah" and they won't be a thing again going forward. Sort of like how the Union Nationale in Quebec, after losing power in 1960, managed to get one more term later on before disappearing. When you think about it, the LPC government JT assembled was quite precarious. Their re-elections in 2019 & 2021 were arguably more flukes than anything else, caused by Scheer being a terrible leader in 2019, and COVID creating a perfect one-time wedge issue that JT could exploit in 2021.

I think the entire "left of the Conservatives" group in Canada could probably live within one party, if that one party behaved more like the US Democrats by allowing multiple distinct camps within the party with individual MPs having free votes. The Democrats have people like Bernie Sanders in the same party along with people like Joe Manchin; mapped onto the Canadian spectrum that basically spans from the NDP all the way to the Red Tories. Individual Democrat congresspeople will often vote against their own President's laws & budgets if they disagree with them, and the Democrat Party's leadership often focuses on trying to maintain compromise between all the different factions; it's not like the caucus is reduced to voting machines like here.

A LPC-NDP merger with that kind of "open", unwhipped method of party discipline could be quite successful, I think.
__________________
"It is only because the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that nobody has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what to do with ourselves." - Friedrich Hayek
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7842  
Old Posted Today, 6:18 PM
lio45 lio45 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 42,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
A LPC-NDP merger with that kind of "open", unwhipped method of party discipline could be quite successful, I think.
Such a reasonable center-left party with a free unwhipped caucus would totally be Canada's Natural Governing Party, I agree with you.

The Loony Left would still need a separate vehicle though, I'm pretty sure. So might as well let the NDP be that, and let the Libs stop courting the NDP's (few) voters so they can concentrate on the overwhelming majority of the electorate.
__________________
Suburbia is the worst capital sin / La soberbia es considerado el original y más serio de los pecados capitales
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7843  
Old Posted Today, 6:50 PM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is online now
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Yeah for current NDP and Liberal supporters to co-exist within a party you'd need leadership contests to become a much bigger deal, like American primaries, to give both supporter groups a sense of influence. Otherwise a 2-party system I'd think would be tenuous. I know common wisdom is FPTP systems support 2-party systems, but only knowing the American example, it feels like their ability to keep it either depends on a consensus model (with relatively moderate differences like before) or when one party goes legitimately crazy (like now).
__________________
Build transit and stuff around it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7844  
Old Posted Today, 6:56 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45 View Post
Such a reasonable center-left party with a free unwhipped caucus would totally be Canada's Natural Governing Party, I agree with you.

The Loony Left would still need a separate vehicle though, I'm pretty sure. So might as well let the NDP be that, and let the Libs stop courting the NDP's (few) voters so they can concentrate on the overwhelming majority of the electorate.
Depends on how you define looney left. I'd put most of the Liberal party in there on a lot of issues and frankly a lot of Conservative provincial governments have drunk the woke koolaid and binge spending agenda.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.