Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond LuxuryYacht
It’s quite amazing that this is your third response and you’ve still yet to give any substantive response. You see an source you don’t like and automatically assume there is an agenda behind it. The article doesn’t even make an point about “cities are bad”….an indication you didn’t read the article (Btw, RCP is a news aggregator site that posts articles and columns from all sides…another sign you are woefully misguided).
You say I got more than I deserved from you…Frankly, I’m still waiting to get anything.
|
It actually was my second response, but that's ok. Based on what you've been posting, I can understand how counting to three may be a struggle for you.
RCP is absolutely a partisan site, and if you don't understand that, you're truly out of your mind. Anyway though, regarding this article in particular, if you truly need this explained to you, fine. Here you go:
You are trying to claim legitimacy for the viewpoint of this article by extolling the virtue of the sources they've used. None of these respected sources are providing the backing for the key points being made in the article however.
In general, RCP is sourcing Philadelphia's rising crime statistics, and crime is definitely up and you can absolutely find legitimate sources for that. Or they're sourcing things like the fact that Philadelphia's transit ridership is down... which of course, we all know that and the reasons are obvious, and they are not related to Philadelphia in particular.
But this article isn't just trying to say that crime is up in Philly and transit ridership is down. What this article is actually positing is that this rise in crime is due to the liberal policies of Philadelphia's government and DA, and it's causing Philadelphia's office market to crater and suburbanites to be afraid of the city. And for the actual main points this article is trying to make, do they have solid sources for this? Of course not.
Out of all of their sources that Philly's DA and policies are leading to rising crime, how many are legitimate news sources like the ones you extolled to defend posting this article? Zero. It's basically all based on the partisan right wing City Journal.
Their source that Philadelphia's office market is in trouble? Just a single source, and it is far from neutral news site, but rather the obviously biased Center City District that is literally funded by Center City Businesses. As others have already posted here from legitimate sources, Philadelphia's office market is actually doing much better than peer cities.
Their source that suburbanites are afraid to come to Philly anymore? It's literally just one person's opinion!
I could write a paragraph right now with the thesis that based on your posts here on the skyscraper forum that you are actually not a person, but rather a well trained labradoodle. In that paragraph I could quote all kinds of well respected scholarly journals and publications regarding dogs and dog training. But if the only evidence I had that actually indicated that you were a labradoodle was the personal opinion of a columnist named Aaron Renn, how persuasive would you find my paragraph? Would it matter that I quoted the New York Times when discussing the behavior of labradoodles?
So yea. It's a terrible article. Obviously partisan. And posting it was unnecessary and unhelpful.
Substantive enough for you?