Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
Interesting. So it sounds like the clock is ticking on the Saddledome.
I guess it does speak to the idea that doing something too unconventional with the roof isn't necessarily a great idea. Wasn't this the same issue with the 'crushed can' in Moose Jaw? I vaguely remember hearing something about the roof failing there, but I'm not sure if that was true.
|
Wow, that was an interesting arena.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moose_...vic_Centre.JPG
I imagine inverted roof designs like Moose Jaw and Saddledome are probably terrible for snow accumulation. With a flat roof, the snow will be relatively spread out across the entire structure. With these designs, the load is concentrated in the middle. Has that actually been an issue? Was there a way to deal with this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas
It feels like the u.s. can build so many and different unique and interesting arenas and stadiums for pro sports and ncaa and Canada now can barely build a pop up stadium in Halifax or a replacement arena in Calgary just feels like the world is passing us by in these things recently.
|
In the U.S. pro sports team are infamous for threatening to move if their new digs aren't largely paid (if not fully) by the public sector. Gun to their heads, Cities and States often do it. Even bankrupt Detroit fell for it. They threaten here as well, but not since the 90s have they actually pulled the trigger.
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular
Honestly besides the concourse and bathrooms the interior is awesome too. The curved ceiling is beautiful and gives a sense of vertigo. Unique among modern arenas.
|
If it wasn't for the roof, it sounds like they could just expand the concourse by creating a "podium" at the base of the arena.