HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #761  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2023, 10:03 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
I like the single level design , although do we really need 2 dining cars + cafe? Why not just a cafe & dining car. Double-decker seems to be over complicated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #762  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2023, 11:28 AM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
Deal will bring added passenger rail service between Pittsburgh, NYC

By Ryan Deto
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Sept. 25, 2023

"PennDOT and Norfolk Southern Railway finalized an official agreement Friday to bring an additional round trip for passenger train service between Pittsburgh and New York City.

PennDOT officials said the state will invest more than $200 million for infrastructure and safety improvements that will help to accommodate the additional trains.

Amtrak now operates one daily round trip between Pittsburgh and New York City, via Harrisburg and Philadelphia. The agreement supports increasing that to two daily round trips. It would mark the first additional passenger train service for Western Pennsylvania in decades..."

https://triblive.com/local/regional/...ittsburgh-nyc/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #763  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2023, 12:39 AM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,754
wat the hades??!



House GOP seeking more than 90% funding cut to Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor

By Ben Brachfeld
Posted on September 28, 2023


House Republicans want to slash funding for Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor, the busiest passenger railroad in North America, by 92%, and are still holding out on the verge of a government shutdown despite bipartisan calls to restore funding.


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/house-g...east-corridor/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #764  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2023, 12:50 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,376
I'd love to slash them by 90%.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #765  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2023, 12:53 AM
homebucket homebucket is offline
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,808
Not surprising. Republicans are paid off by the oil and gas and auto industry. Together they’ve been holding back and/or removing public transit in the US for the last 50 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #766  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2023, 6:13 PM
SoCalKid SoCalKid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 456
I wish we had a parliamentary style multi party system so the crazies weren't able to hijack a party like this. It'd be nice to have more than the current choice of neanderthals vs growth-limiters as our political options. The lesser of the evils is clear to me all day, but it'd feel so good to be able to vote for a party I really liked, rather than one I disliked less...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #767  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2023, 7:44 PM
UrbanImpact's Avatar
UrbanImpact UrbanImpact is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
wat the hades??!



House GOP seeking more than 90% funding cut to Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor

By Ben Brachfeld
Posted on September 28, 2023


House Republicans want to slash funding for Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor, the busiest passenger railroad in North America, by 92%, and are still holding out on the verge of a government shutdown despite bipartisan calls to restore funding.


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/house-g...east-corridor/
MAGA is really ruining this country and any progress. How are you going to make America great if other countries will have the technological upper hand?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #768  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2023, 9:18 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,376
They're the disturbers of our harmony for all I'm concerned. I viscerally loathe these people.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #769  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2023, 12:08 AM
FromSD FromSD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
Not surprising. Republicans are paid off by the oil and gas and auto industry. Together they’ve been holding back and/or removing public transit in the US for the last 50 years.
You're probably right about the GOP being paid off by the oil and gas industry. But I don't think that what's behind this proposed spending cut. This is more an FU to the big cities of the Northeast, which the Republicans hate because they're "Democrat-run" and because they're full of those coastal elites. And if the Republicans win again in 2024, I'm sure we'll see proposals to defund Amtrak just like we did when Bush took over in 2001 and Trump in 2017. Such cuts are always justified as an act of fiscal prudence, even though the savings are minuscule. Actually I'm surprised the defund Amtrak proposal hasn't shown up in the House GOP's wish list this time, though I'm sure there's still time for it to pop up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #770  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2023, 4:19 AM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,873
When oh when will we learn that private vehicle transportation is not sustainable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #771  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2023, 1:57 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
This is exciting news.

MassDOT Outlines ‘Compass Rail’ Vision for New Passenger Services in Western Mass.
MassDOT is pursuing plans for new Amtrak routes from Boston to New Haven and Albany, with Springfield as a new hub for intercity rail connections.

Streetsblog
Oct. 18, 2023


A map of existing and proposed Amtrak services in western Massachusetts. New proposed services include the red line, an inland route from New Haven, CT to Boston, via Springfield, and the blue line, a new Boston-Albany route. Courtesy of MassDOT.


"MassDOT is expanding its intercity passenger rail plans for western Massachusetts to incorporate more north-south service through the Connecticut River Valley and a possible new route between Boston and Albany, New York.

At Wednesday's MassDOT Board of Directors meeting, Rail and Transit Administrator Meredith Slesinger delivered a brief presentation about MassDOT's plans for an overlapping network of new and existing intercity passenger rail services through a new hub in downtown Springfield.

Where MassDOT had previously been focused on east-west rail connections, the agency is now looking at linking more destinations – inside and outside of the state's borders – to the north and south as well.

Slesinger called the new vision "compass rail" – a vision for new intercity passenger rail routes that connect north-south routes through the Connecticut River Valley with east-west routes that connect Albany to Boston, with Springfield as the hub of the compass..."

https://mass.streetsblog.org/2023/10...rn-mass-albany
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #772  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2023, 2:08 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,376
Indeed.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #773  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2023, 8:44 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
It would be if they went with the 4.2 billion , 125mph option but they went with upgrades to existing 60mph corridor which will be increased to 80mph.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #774  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2023, 8:44 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
Hudson Station

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #775  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2023, 11:32 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
This is absolutely fantastic news. I have been riding Amtrak between Washington and CT every two weeks (sometimes more frequently) this past year. Unlike tax cuts for billionaires, this will significantly improve daily life for me and millions of other Americans. It will also create many excellent jobs.

Biden invests billions to modernize northeast US rail corridor


By Steve Holland and Jarrett Renshaw
November 6, 2023
Reuters

"BEAR, Delaware, Nov 6 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden on Monday announced the latest tranche of federal dollars to modernize key portions of the nation's busiest rail corridor that stretches from Boston to Washington D.C.

Biden, who said he has traveled through the tunnel "thousands" of times, added that the region represents 20% of America's gross domestic product and hasn't seen a "major upgrade" for generations.

The investment will reduce delays, allow businesses to get their goods to market faster, benefit the environment and create a hundred thousand union jobs, the president said..."

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/bid...or-2023-11-06/

========================================

Here are the projects that will be funded.

Amtrak Awarded Federal Funds for 12 Projects of National Significance Totaling Nearly $10B Across America’s Busiest Rail Corridor


Image courtesy of Amtrak.

"The grants announced today will support 12 Amtrak-led projects through the FRA’s Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Program (Fed-State NEC):

Frederick Douglass Tunnel Program (up to $4.7B)
Susquehanna River Rail Bridge Project (up to $2.08B)
East River Tunnel Rehabilitation Project (up to $1.26B)
Connecticut River Bridge Replacement Project (up to $826.64M)
Dock Bridge Rehabilitation Project (up to $300.18M)
Sawtooth Bridges Replacement Project (up to $133.32M)
Baltimore Penn Station Redevelopment (up to $108.32M)
Pelham Bay Bridge Replacement Project (up to $58.27M)
Gunpowder River Bridge Replacement Program (up to $30M)
NEC South End Infrastructure Renewal and Speed Improvement Planning Study (up to $21.6M)
Bush River Bridge Replacement Program (up to $18.8M)
New Haven to Providence Capacity Planning Study (up to $4M)
Another 13 NEC projects led by Amtrak’s partners also received funding, including:

Hudson Tunnel Project – Gateway Development Commission (up to $3.79B)
Penn Station Access – MTA (up to $1.64B)
Walk Bridge Replacement Project – CTDOT (up to $465M)
Devon Bridge Replacement Project – CTDOT (up to $245.92M)
Delco Lead – NJ TRANSIT (up to $180.9M)
New Haven Line Power Improvement Program – CTDOT (up to $122.8M)
Devon Bridge Interim Repairs – CTDOT (up to $119.32M)
Hartford Line Rail Program Double Track (Phase 3B) Project – CTDOT (up to $104.86M)
New Haven Line Track Improvement and Mobility Enhancement Part 1 and 3 – CTDOT (up to $71.64M)
Newark Penn Station Vertical Circulation Improvements – NJ TRANSIT (up to $59.2M)
Reconstruction of Cornwells Heights Station – SEPTA (up to $30.5M)
Saugatuck River Bridge Replacement – CTDOT (up to $23.2M)
New Haven Line Network Infrastructure Upgrade Project – CTDOT (up to $15.4M)"

https://media.amtrak.com/2023/11/amt...rail-corridor/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #776  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2023, 12:11 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,376
What you mean you didn't have all that benevolent prosperity wash all over you thanks to the bleeding hearts of the leisure class?


Yes, indeed this is excellent news!
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #777  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2023, 3:06 AM
Muji's Avatar
Muji Muji is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,183
That really is going to be a game changer for so many of us on the East Coast. It's great to see that Bipartisan Infrastructure Law money getting to work!
__________________
My blog of then and now photos of LA: http://urbandiachrony.wordpress.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #778  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2023, 2:35 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
This would include an Amtrak station at New Orleans International Airport. The proposed route would use the Canadian Pacific Kansas City tracks.

Baton Rouge-New Orleans Passenger Rail Service Advances

By Carolina Worrell
Railway Age
Oct. 27, 2023

"Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards on Oct. 26 joined Department of Transportation and Development Sec. Eric Kalivoda, Amtrak CEO Stephen Gardner and other officials to sign a development agreement that will advance the return of intercity passenger rail service between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, La.

The agreement, signed at New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal, “is a breakthrough for a project that has roots in 2008, when the idea was introduced through a concept study,” officials said. According to the agreement, passenger service could start as early as 2027.

According to officials, Amtrak will use Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) and CN rights-of-way located along the I-10 corridor that are one of three routes connecting New Orleans and Baton Rouge. The CPKC/CN tracks, Amtrak says, were chosen because they were “the most direct and had less conflict with freight transportation.” The CPKC New Orleans Subdivision (former KCS) accounts for most of the routing. Trains, after traversing a short distance on CPKC’s Baton Rouge Subdivision (former KCS) would connect with CN’s McComb Subdivision at New Orleans Junction to reach New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal..."

https://www.railwayage.com/passenger...vice-advances/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #779  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2023, 2:53 PM
skizzo skizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
I viscerally loathe these people.
Trust me, its mutual.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #780  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2023, 3:38 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by 202_Cyclist View Post
This would include an Amtrak station at New Orleans International Airport. The proposed route would use the Canadian Pacific Kansas City tracks.

Baton Rouge-New Orleans Passenger Rail Service Advances

By Carolina Worrell
Railway Age
Oct. 27, 2023

"Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards on Oct. 26 joined Department of Transportation and Development Sec. Eric Kalivoda, Amtrak CEO Stephen Gardner and other officials to sign a development agreement that will advance the return of intercity passenger rail service between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, La.

The agreement, signed at New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal, “is a breakthrough for a project that has roots in 2008, when the idea was introduced through a concept study,” officials said. According to the agreement, passenger service could start as early as 2027.

According to officials, Amtrak will use Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) and CN rights-of-way located along the I-10 corridor that are one of three routes connecting New Orleans and Baton Rouge. The CPKC/CN tracks, Amtrak says, were chosen because they were “the most direct and had less conflict with freight transportation.” The CPKC New Orleans Subdivision (former KCS) accounts for most of the routing. Trains, after traversing a short distance on CPKC’s Baton Rouge Subdivision (former KCS) would connect with CN’s McComb Subdivision at New Orleans Junction to reach New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal..."

https://www.railwayage.com/passenger...vice-advances/
This is of course welcome news, but it's something CPKC had already agreed to as a condition of their merger. Note this is only an operating agreement - there is still no funding for the many capital needs here, from big tickets like replacing the Spillway bridge to simply building station platforms in each of the towns and cities.

Having the operating agreement, of course, should help Louisiana win the competitive grant funding from FRA. They want to avoid a repeat of the New Orleans-Mobile debacle where the funding was in place, but Amtrak wasted years in court and in STB hearings fighting CSX. If/when the funding is awarded, they can start work immediately.

On the other hand, the political angle here isn't great. There's a good chance that the new Gov Landry kills the project again, just like Bobby Jindal did 15 years ago. And there isn't much upside for the Biden administration to send a bunch of rail money to a deep red state that consistently votes for Republicans at the national level. In fact, if Landry kills the project then it turns into an embarrassment for Biden, just like it did for Obama.

Lastly - I think there is a minimum threshold you need to offer on services like this. NOLA-BR already enjoys a direct interstate connection and bus service. One train/day is miserable and might be worse than nothing at all. We can look at successful new rail services like TriRail, FrontRunner, TRE, SunRail, and failed services like Music City Star and Northstar. The key is having a reasonable frequency throughout the day.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...

Last edited by ardecila; Nov 10, 2023 at 3:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.