HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


201 North Columbus Drive in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #281  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2021, 11:08 PM
ivi237 ivi237 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 17
Update from an Alderman Reilly email 1/8

Development Update Regarding Parcel O (193 North Columbus Drive)

Images: https://files.constantcontact.com/5a...fb09d7f19d.pdf

The proposed Parcel O project at Lakeshore East, located at 193 N. Columbus Dr., originally received approval from the Chicago Plan Commission in 2018 after multiple community meetings and extensive negotiation with Alderman Reilly. Since that time, the Developer, Parcel O LLC, has revised the design and reduced the scope of the program to be contained in the building.

The Parcel O building has been revised to contain only one hotel with 269 keys rather than two hotels with 570 keys. The Developer has also reduced the number of apartment units from 640 to approximately 599 apartment units and 30 serviced apartment units. The redesign also includes three levels of co-working space. There are two retail spaces proposed in the building: approximately 5,500 square feet of retail adjacent to Upper Columbus Drive and approximately 3,500 square feet of retail adjacent to North Park Drive. As a result of these revisions to the program of the building, there are also reductions in the building height and the overall square footage for the building.

The exterior design of the tower has been updated to reflect the reduction in height and square footage, based on the programmatic shift from two hotels to one. The massing of the building has been updated and the design is derived from a sawtooth plan. The sawtooth creates dynamic movement along the facade and strong vertical lines that pull the eye up to the building’s sawtooth crown. The sawtooth articulation reverses direction between the residential and hotel floors, highlighting the change in program. The tower is pulled to the west, creating variation and relief on the east facade and allowing for a base that is more in scale with the adjacent buildings on the park.

As a reminder, after Alderman Reilly’s thorough review and significant input into the project as a result of community feedback, the Developer has agreed to deliver multiple public benefit improvements at Developer’s private expense, including:
  • A pedway connection that will connect through Village Market and Blue Cross / Blue Shield to the greater pedway network.
  • The existing median on Upper Columbus will be extended south and a pedestrian refuge island will be installed. Crosswalk will be realigned.
  • A new traffic signal at Upper Columbus & East South Water Street will be installed.
  • At the intersection of Upper Columbus Drive and South Water Street, the crosswalk will be realigned on the south leg of the intersection. The east end of the crosswalk will move to the corner next to the Aqua building rather than the corner next to the fire station.
  • At the intersection of Upper Columbus Drive and South Water Street, a curb bump-out on the southwest corner will be installed to narrow the roadway and pedestrian crossing distance on Columbus Drive.
  • At the intersection of Upper Columbus Drive and South Water Street a new ADA ramp and crosswalk striping will be installed on the west leg of the intersection.
  • New road pavement markings will be added to Upper Columbus in front of Aqua and Parcel O.
  • New Left Turn traffic signal phase for intermediate Columbus (northbound) to intermediate East South Water Street (westbound).
  • Timing of the traffic signal at Upper Columbus Drive & Randolph Street will be adjusted to increase the amount of green time allocated to the protected eastbound left-turn phase, while similarly decreasing the westbound green time.
  • At the ramp from Lower Stetson Avenue to Upper Columbus Drive, signs will be posted on both sides of the eastbound approach of Upper South Water prohibiting U turns and left turns.
  • In front of Parcel O, the curb will be extended 3 feet into Columbus Drive to narrow the parking lane between the driveway and the bus stop.
  • Two planters in front of Aqua will be removed to improve pedestrian flow.
  • Public elevators will connect the Upper Level of Columbus Drive to Intermediate, Lower, and Park Levels.
  • Light fixtures will be installed along Parcel O and Aqua to improve lighting conditions at the east sidewalk of Intermediate Columbus level.

Please note that all other material terms and aspects of the Parcel O project remain unchanged from the Chicago Plan Commission approval in 2018. The developer is seeking final site plan approval from the Chicago Department of Planning and Development and no further hearings before the Chicago Plan Commission or additional Chicago City Council approvals are required for this proposal.

The developer proposes beginning construction no earlier than the October 2021 and hopes to complete construction by April 2024.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #282  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2021, 11:16 PM
Ricochet48 Ricochet48 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 166
Yup just got that email to ^

I think it looks much better.

Very tight infill that few will even see though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #283  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2021, 11:22 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 5,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivi237 View Post
Development Update Regarding Parcel O (193 North Columbus Drive)

Images: https://files.constantcontact.com/5a...fb09d7f19d.pdf

The proposed Parcel O project at Lakeshore East, located at 193 N. Columbus Dr., originally received approval from the Chicago Plan Commission in 2018 after multiple community meetings and extensive negotiation with Alderman Reilly. Since that time, the Developer, Parcel O LLC, has revised the design and reduced the scope of the program to be contained in the building.

The Parcel O building has been revised to contain only one hotel with 269 keys rather than two hotels with 570 keys. The Developer has also reduced the number of apartment units from 640 to approximately 599 apartment units and 30 serviced apartment units. The redesign also includes three levels of co-working space. There are two retail spaces proposed in the building: approximately 5,500 square feet of retail adjacent to Upper Columbus Drive and approximately 3,500 square feet of retail adjacent to North Park Drive. As a result of these revisions to the program of the building, there are also reductions in the building height and the overall square footage for the building.

The exterior design of the tower has been updated to reflect the reduction in height and square footage, based on the programmatic shift from two hotels to one. The massing of the building has been updated and the design is derived from a sawtooth plan. The sawtooth creates dynamic movement along the facade and strong vertical lines that pull the eye up to the building’s sawtooth crown. The sawtooth articulation reverses direction between the residential and hotel floors, highlighting the change in program. The tower is pulled to the west, creating variation and relief on the east facade and allowing for a base that is more in scale with the adjacent buildings on the park.

As a reminder, after Alderman Reilly’s thorough review and significant input into the project as a result of community feedback, the Developer has agreed to deliver multiple public benefit improvements at Developer’s private expense, including:
  • A pedway connection that will connect through Village Market and Blue Cross / Blue Shield to the greater pedway network.
  • The existing median on Upper Columbus will be extended south and a pedestrian refuge island will be installed. Crosswalk will be realigned.
  • A new traffic signal at Upper Columbus & East South Water Street will be installed.
  • At the intersection of Upper Columbus Drive and South Water Street, the crosswalk will be realigned on the south leg of the intersection. The east end of the crosswalk will move to the corner next to the Aqua building rather than the corner next to the fire station.
  • At the intersection of Upper Columbus Drive and South Water Street, a curb bump-out on the southwest corner will be installed to narrow the roadway and pedestrian crossing distance on Columbus Drive.
  • At the intersection of Upper Columbus Drive and South Water Street a new ADA ramp and crosswalk striping will be installed on the west leg of the intersection.
  • New road pavement markings will be added to Upper Columbus in front of Aqua and Parcel O.
  • New Left Turn traffic signal phase for intermediate Columbus (northbound) to intermediate East South Water Street (westbound).
  • Timing of the traffic signal at Upper Columbus Drive & Randolph Street will be adjusted to increase the amount of green time allocated to the protected eastbound left-turn phase, while similarly decreasing the westbound green time.
  • At the ramp from Lower Stetson Avenue to Upper Columbus Drive, signs will be posted on both sides of the eastbound approach of Upper South Water prohibiting U turns and left turns.
  • In front of Parcel O, the curb will be extended 3 feet into Columbus Drive to narrow the parking lane between the driveway and the bus stop.
  • Two planters in front of Aqua will be removed to improve pedestrian flow.
  • Public elevators will connect the Upper Level of Columbus Drive to Intermediate, Lower, and Park Levels.
  • Light fixtures will be installed along Parcel O and Aqua to improve lighting conditions at the east sidewalk of Intermediate Columbus level.

Please note that all other material terms and aspects of the Parcel O project remain unchanged from the Chicago Plan Commission approval in 2018. The developer is seeking final site plan approval from the Chicago Department of Planning and Development and no further hearings before the Chicago Plan Commission or additional Chicago City Council approvals are required for this proposal.

The developer proposes beginning construction no earlier than the October 2021 and hopes to complete construction by April 2024.

hah you beat me to it. I'll go ahead and post the pics shown in the e-mail:

view from NE:


view from NW:
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #284  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2021, 11:26 PM
ajradfotwo ajradfotwo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 43
Oh dang, this looks much better than the original design. Build it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #285  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2021, 11:32 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 26,623
here are the old renderings so people don't have to click back to see 'em:

__________________
"every time a strip mall dies, an angel gets its wings"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #286  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2021, 11:33 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 5,185
Looks about 500' now. This project is kinda lame, a good filler nonetheless.
__________________
Dump Trump 2020
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #287  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2021, 11:38 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 1,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Looks about 500' now. This project is kinda lame, a good filler nonetheless.
Here's a comparison of the old and new design, the revision seems to put it around 600 ft: https://files.constantcontact.com/5a...fb09d7f19d.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #288  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 1:18 AM
rgarri4's Avatar
rgarri4 rgarri4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 884
Much more interesting design
__________________
Renderings, Animations, VR
Youtube
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #289  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 2:03 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,199
Honestly you may not like the height reduction but I like the design much better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #290  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 2:10 AM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,777
First design is better, IMO; but, now with the program changing, there is no longer a rationalization for the form of that design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #291  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 6:21 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 9,989
Changes here allow for more wiggle room for Site-I.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #292  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 4:20 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 15,751
^ That's a great point! Good to keep the bigger picture in mind. With Vista providing a second road connection to Wacker, there should be plenty of infrastructure to support some serious density on Parcel I.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #293  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 4:44 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
Honestly you may not like the height reduction but I like the design much better.
One of those rare times where I'll take the height reduction because the design is so much better. This was never going to be a visible building except from Lakeshore East Park (or whatever the official name is of that park). Having a good design in this spot is more important than being an extra 50 or 75 feet taller.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #294  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 6:31 PM
southoftheloop southoftheloop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 99
New design adheres to the maritime / sail motif scattered about Lakeshore East
(note the entrance: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8846...=en&authuser=0)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #295  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 6:43 PM
HomrQT's Avatar
HomrQT HomrQT is offline
All-American City Boy
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hinsdale / Uptown, Chicago
Posts: 1,880
Sad to see the height chop. The new design does look a little better. Odd they got rid of those balconies facing the park. Seems like a good direction for balconies with the open space.
__________________
1. 111 W 57 - Manhattan, New York - SHoP Architects - Photo
2. The Smith Center - Las Vegas, Nevada - David M. Schwarz Architects - Photo
3. One Chicago Square - Chicago - HPA and Goettsch Partners - Photo
4. Chicago Board of Trade - Chicago - Holabird & Root - Photo
5. Cathedral of Learning - Pittsburgh - Charles Klauder - Photo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #296  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 7:30 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,224
The old design was wayy better...in the end this will just be another god forsaken blue box...you wont even notice the sawtooth design unless you really get up close...dont be fooled by renderings ...ive seen this trick to many times...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #297  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 7:46 PM
gandalf612 gandalf612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Edgewater, Chicago
Posts: 197
I'm rarely a fan of the offset box trend so very happy with the redesign. Glad we're getting another entrance to the park too
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #298  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 7:48 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
An article in Crains about it:

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/comm...igh-rise-plans

Financing not yet arranged, plan to start construction some time after October (I don’t blame them!)

I like the redesign. I wish it were taller, but I like the emphasis on verticality
__________________
The only thing better than a V10 is a V12
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #299  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 7:49 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by gandalf612 View Post
I'm rarely a fan of the offset box trend so very happy with the redesign. Glad we're getting another entrance to the park too
That other entrance to the park has already been there for many years
__________________
The only thing better than a V10 is a V12
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #300  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2021, 8:29 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,893
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!

Last edited by Tom In Chicago; Jan 12, 2021 at 6:29 PM. Reason: Please use hyperlinks for off-topic unsourced images
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:44 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.