HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted May 5, 2019, 7:40 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
at 33 of 40 floors
[IMG]1500 Mission at South Van Ness by viewguysf, on Flickr[/IMG]

The City and County of San Francisco seal is beginning to show on the left.
[IMG]1500-1580 Mission by viewguysf, on Flickr[/IMG]

I'm loving the lower part of this project too and realize now it's being constructed by two different contractors.
[IMG]1500-1580 Mission by viewguysf, on Flickr[/IMG]

Last edited by viewguysf; May 5, 2019 at 8:01 AM.
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 5:49 PM
sella1517 sella1517 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 4
Does anyone know who the mechanical contractor and drywall contractor are on 1500 mission?
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted May 21, 2019, 11:40 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
[IMG]1500 Mission @ South Van Ness by viewguysf, on Flickr[/IMG]

I'm really liking this development, from every angle and distance. The core has now risen beyond where I thought it would stop.
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted May 22, 2019, 6:08 AM
mizago mizago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 17
I agree it's looking great. There's something subtly Gehry-esque about this design... kind of a "wrapped" look, albeit much more geometric.
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted May 22, 2019, 7:40 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by viewguysf View Post
The core has now risen beyond where I thought it would stop.
Counting floors, it looks like 36 to me. That means 4 to go.
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 4:30 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
Counting floors, it looks like 36 to me. That means 4 to go.
It’s actually going to be 39 floors. I tried to find the exact height, but couldn’t. That would be interesting to know.
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted May 23, 2019, 7:37 PM
pseudolus pseudolus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by viewguysf View Post
It’s actually going to be 39 floors. I tried to find the exact height, but couldn’t. That would be interesting to know.
416' to the parapet, 396' to the roof

I tried to post a link, but am having a difficulties.
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted May 24, 2019, 2:26 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
416' to the parapet, 396' to the roof

I tried to post a link, but am having a difficulties.
Thanks! Now, maybe Pedestrian can work his influence to have the floors and height corrected on this thread.
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted May 24, 2019, 2:33 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by viewguysf View Post
Thanks! Now, maybe Pedestrian can work his influence to have the floors and height corrected on this thread.
My "influence", for the record, is just to ask JManc who is very responsive and helpful and anybody can do it. I suggest whoever has the documentation of a correction needed PM him with the info. He has said (to me) he would be helpful in that way when needed.
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted May 26, 2019, 3:55 AM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
nice lil aerial (by me):

https://vimeo.com/338449510/323725c04c

Last edited by mthd; May 26, 2019 at 4:06 AM.
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted May 26, 2019, 4:12 AM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthd View Post
Thanks for taking and posting this!
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted May 26, 2019, 6:05 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillynova View Post
Thanks for taking and posting this!
Yes—well done!!
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted May 26, 2019, 6:08 PM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by viewguysf View Post
Yes—well done!!
thanks!

and hey, we joined in the same month and year
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2019, 6:01 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,688


     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2019, 6:08 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,688
Duplicate
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2019, 4:38 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
June 6, 2019

[IMG]1500 Mission @ South Van Ness by viewguysf, on Flickr[/IMG]
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2019, 7:41 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,148
more distant views... from Hayes Valley



... and Laguna and Market

     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2019, 2:30 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,452
**Sunday, June 16, 2019**

This building appears very tall in person, perhaps because it is not surrounded by other two buildings, but I think it's profile and facade advance its height in our eyes as we approach.







     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2019, 5:15 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by simms3_redux View Post
**Sunday, June 16, 2019**

This building appears very tall in person, perhaps because it is not surrounded by other two buildings, but I think it's profile and facade advance its height in our eyes as we approach.
Yeah, I totally agree with you. Looking at SOMA district and looking at this building makes me think this building is huge/tall
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2019, 1:12 AM
BobbyMucho BobbyMucho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 219
It's coming together really nicely. My only 'would-be-nice-if' would be for a different color cladding on the shorter portion to help break it all up a little.

Overall though, I'm excited for this to bring some life to this gnarly intersection.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:06 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.