Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City
Yes, they agreed to buy Surrey before selling Burnaby, so assuming the Surrey purchase had completed in July, they would have to have financing in place. My point was that this would have been expensive, however it was structured, so selling off an asset in Burnaby that they'd paid far less for several years ago made financial sense.
There are also the other benefits I mentioned; Surrey is more easily phased and not as big a financing commitment for construction and less complex without the commercial podium. The agent was given a very short time to find a buyer for Burnaby, but as the story says, he already knew Keltic because he sold them a Richmond site for $300m a year ago. The tight timing suggested to me that Bosa were trying to tie it all up quickly, presumably for accounting reasons?
I didn't see the deal as suggesting Bosa necessarily favouring Surrey more than Burnaby though, just that there was an opportunity to acquire a pre assembled site in Surrey that's flexible to develop, and that there was also an opportunity to make a profit on selling off the Burnaby site which is inherently more complicated to develop, and where there are several other developers looking to build very tall and expensive towers into the same market. ( Here's today's 70 storey tower). I still think they were lucky that Keltic were willing to buy the site (although it's described as a share deal, not a cash purchase).
|
Fascinating.
(...about the 5000 Kingsway 70 storey tower proposal)
I had read about that project proposal before on the City of Burnaby's project website, and it had been presented as strictly just a master plan concept design study proposal, without necessarily the intent to move forward into actually redeveloping the site.
It'd be intruiging if they're really interested in moving forward with a rezoning/design permit application process.
It seems like an ambitious proposal - if not an uninspired design...of the tower itself.
Particularly one that's supposed to be neighbour to Concord's Grand Tower across the street(...and apparently really dwarf it from the looks of that (probably deceiptive render). '70 storeys' doesn't strike me as it would be that more immensely taller than a next door 65 storey tower.)
Although I grant that it's just an initial proposal for a master plan concept so the tower design is really not the point at this stage.
The proposed timeline is also curious, though that also makes sense to me from the perspective of owners wanting to apply for rezoning and upzone the site and then sell it off for a massive profit to more established developers to develop it instead.
Or maybe they're trying to align it with the Mall's own proposed 80 year timeline to break up and redevelop the mall into a downtown core.
In any case, it says they're planning for a formal rezoning application for early 2023, so it'll be interesting to see if they really move forward from that point on.