HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2981  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 4:53 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
Depends what you mean by sprawl. I love that LA seems to go on forever, it means theres always more city to explore and it keeps things from getting stale. What I do wish for is more walkable density, i.e high density corridors and nodes corresponding with transit infrastructure. This is the development pattern cities in Japan and Korea generally take (and why I'm so obsessed with them) and the model most applicable to LA, as we basically already have one running along Wilshire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2982  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 5:39 PM
WestCoastSupertall's Avatar
WestCoastSupertall WestCoastSupertall is offline
LADevelopmentMap.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 196
Well...this answers our question about the NII and a preemptive boom

http://la.curbed.com/2016/10/5/13181...hood-integrity
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2983  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 5:45 PM
Doctorboffin Doctorboffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 383
^It's ironic that more then likely the NII wont pass and it also happened to make the city a lot better by accident.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2984  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 5:55 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
Nightmare scenario:

1. Developers rush to get things built before NII
2. NII passes
3. Flood of new housing stock lowers prices in the short run
4. NII claims their anti-development policies lowered housing costs
5. Housing costs rise in medium/long term, NIMBYs cite NII as evidence restricting supply lowers costs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2985  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 6:34 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastSupertall View Post
Well...this answers our question about the NII and a preemptive boom
Ironically, that project wouldn't be affected by NII, as it doesn't request a GPA or any zone variances.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2986  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 6:35 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,446
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2987  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 7:10 PM
Jun's Avatar
Jun Jun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 313
That looks better than most the stumpies in South Park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2988  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 7:12 PM
Doctorboffin Doctorboffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 383
^^^Eh, I think that puts way too much faith in the NIMBYS, they are too unaware of the world to have thoughts that complex. In complete serious, I really doubt the NII will pass. Maybe I am just doing wishful thinking, but the people that vote on these the most are the people who make money off this growth. I wouldn't be shocked if it went 50/50, but the NII needs 2/3rds of the vote to get passed.

^I really like the design and scale for that building. I wish it was bigger, but it has a nice bulk to it with out being oppressive looking. My only real issue is the amount of parking, but at least it interacts with the street and the parking is very well hidden. In fact the building over all has a really nice design, it doesn't look cheap or like a mash up in styles. Hopefully in the near future there will be buildings of that scale (or larger) and quality all over that neighborhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2989  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 7:57 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctorboffin View Post
^^^Eh, I think that puts way too much faith in the NIMBYS, they are too unaware of the world to have thoughts that complex. In complete serious, I really doubt the NII will pass. Maybe I am just doing wishful thinking, but the people that vote on these the most are the people who make money off this growth. I wouldn't be shocked if it went 50/50, but the NII needs 2/3rds of the vote to get passed.

^I really like the design and scale for that building. I wish it was bigger, but it has a nice bulk to it with out being oppressive looking. My only real issue is the amount of parking, but at least it interacts with the street and the parking is very well hidden. In fact the building over all has a really nice design, it doesn't look cheap or like a mash up in styles. Hopefully in the near future there will be buildings of that scale (or larger) and quality all over that neighborhood.
i dont think NII needs 2/3rds. Its not a tax so a simple 50% +1 would be enough. I agree though, i dont think it passes, but crazier things have happened.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2990  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 8:23 PM
Doctorboffin Doctorboffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by LosAngelesSportsFan View Post
i dont think NII needs 2/3rds. Its not a tax so a simple 50% +1 would be enough. I agree though, i dont think it passes, but crazier things have happened.
According to this Curbed article it needs 2/3rds, but I'm not sure how accurate it is.

http://la.curbed.com/2016/8/31/12706...tiative-ballot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2991  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 10:38 PM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jun View Post
That looks better than most the stumpies in South Park.
I see stucco, though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2992  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 11:40 PM
Wally West Wally West is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChargerCarl View Post
Nightmare scenario:

1. Developers rush to get things built before NII
2. NII passes
3. Flood of new housing stock lowers prices in the short run
4. NII claims their anti-development policies lowered housing costs
5. Housing costs rise in medium/long term, NIMBYs cite NII as evidence restricting supply lowers costs
I wish you didn't tell me this. Now this is going to be a worry in the back of mind.

I really hope NII fails. If it requires a 2/3rd pass, I'm confident it'll fail. But 51%? That's victory is up in the air imo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2993  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2016, 11:41 PM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally West View Post
I wish you didn't tell me this. Now this is going to be a worry in the back of mind.

I really hope NII fails. If it requires a 2/3rd pass, I'm confident it'll fail. But 51%? That's victory is up in the air imo.
Really it's 50.0000000001% to pass
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2994  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2016, 12:18 AM
Wilcal Wilcal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Yucaipa--LA exurban wasteland
Posts: 711
Has anyone considered the fact that even if the initiative passes it can still be held up in court, perhaps indefinitely. The city, developers, interested parties, or even a private citizen can file the necessary documents. Some issue, any issue, or even the slightest flaw can be used as a basis for argument. Maybe a developer will retain the services of the infamous Robert Silverstein. He of all people is an expert at wading through bullshit--even his own.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2995  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2016, 12:27 AM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 655
Saw this posted at the NE corner of 4th and Broadway today. Right across the street from the buildings that were recently bulldozed to make way for SCG America's 34-story Tower . I think they got the address wrong though. The building that the notice was posted on is at 223 West 4th st, not East

__________________
I ♥ Manhattanization

Last edited by San Frangelino; Oct 7, 2016 at 12:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2996  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2016, 12:39 AM
NativeOrange's Avatar
NativeOrange NativeOrange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilcal View Post
Has anyone considered the fact that even if the initiative passes it can still be held up in court, perhaps indefinitely. The city, developers, interested parties, or even a private citizen can file the necessary documents. Some issue, any issue, or even the slightest flaw can be used as a basis for argument. Maybe a developer will retain the services of the infamous Robert Silverstein. He of all people is an expert at wading through bullshit--even his own.
My worries of it passing have diminished only because I fee the groups opposing it are much more powerful and have more money to fight it than its proponents.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2997  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2016, 1:21 AM
Doctorboffin Doctorboffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by San Frangelino View Post
Saw this posted at the NE corner of 4th and Broadway today. Right across the street from the buildings that were recently bulldozed to make way for SCG America's 34-story Tower . I think they got the address wrong though. The building that the notice was posted on is at 223 West 4th st, not East

Is there anything proposed for that site, or no?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2998  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2016, 2:14 AM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctorboffin View Post
Is there anything proposed for that site, or no?
I don't know. There is this http://brighamyen.com/2012/04/18/sas...n-downtown-la/. But I pray to God it's not what they are planning to build
__________________
I ♥ Manhattanization
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2999  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2016, 2:25 AM
Resident Resident is offline
BikeMike
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Miracle Mile, formerly DTLA
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by San Frangelino View Post
Saw this posted at the NE corner of 4th and Broadway today. Right across the street from the buildings that were recently bulldozed to make way for SCG America's 34-story Tower . I think they got the address wrong though. The building that the notice was posted on is at 223 West 4th st, not East

I can't see the picture
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3000  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2016, 2:32 AM
NativeOrange's Avatar
NativeOrange NativeOrange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resident View Post
I can't see the picture
It's okay. It's not worth it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.