HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9021  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 3:52 AM
dilliam dilliam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 162
This thing will get built one way or another.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9022  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 8:21 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 802
New Project Connect renderings feature light rail buildout opportunities in the future

by: Kelsey Thompson

Posted: Apr 27, 2023 / 01:51 PM CDT

Updated: Apr 27, 2023 / 01:51 PM CDT

https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...in-the-future/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9023  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2023, 9:09 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX2030 View Post
New Project Connect renderings feature light rail buildout opportunities in the future

by: Kelsey Thompson

Posted: Apr 27, 2023 / 01:51 PM CDT

Updated: Apr 27, 2023 / 01:51 PM CDT

https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...in-the-future/
Someone should explain to KXAN what a "rendering" is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9024  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 3:52 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 802
Some Project Connect cost per mile analysis by Julio Gonzalez Altamirano

https://twitter.com/juliogatx/status...Cz8Zqn9-wtAAAA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9025  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 4:19 PM
Novacek Novacek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX2030 View Post
Some Project Connect cost per mile analysis by Julio Gonzalez Altamirano

https://twitter.com/juliogatx/status...Cz8Zqn9-wtAAAA
"oranges to tangerines" is being generous.

He's comparing systems built more than a decade ago. Builds in a low interest/low financing cost environment to high. Extensions to initial systems (which are more expensive due to needing the initial rolling stock, maintenance yard, and building in the most expensive central part of the city).

There's an attempt to apply an "inflation" modifier, but no explanation for the source or magnitude of that. Looks like it may just be CPI, not actual construction/land costs. Seems to be a 27% increase from 2014 to 2023, which seems low.

And then of course, Austin isn't constructing in 2023, and he's totally leaving out that additional multiplier.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9026  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 4:30 PM
Novacek Novacek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,510
Plus I'm going to publicly call out/shame Julio Gonzalez Altamirano for blocking me for pointing out his mistakes

https://twitter.com/MattNovacek/stat...47351841206272

(which he still never corrected)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9027  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 5:30 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
"oranges to tangerines" is being generous.

He's comparing systems built more than a decade ago. Builds in a low interest/low financing cost environment to high. Extensions to initial systems (which are more expensive due to needing the initial rolling stock, maintenance yard, and building in the most expensive central part of the city).

There's an attempt to apply an "inflation" modifier, but no explanation for the source or magnitude of that. Looks like it may just be CPI, not actual construction/land costs. Seems to be a 27% increase from 2014 to 2023, which seems low.

And then of course, Austin isn't constructing in 2023, and he's totally leaving out that additional multiplier.
Altamirano is estimating 350-500m per mile. What is your estimate per mile for those two lines? Hopefully it's significantly lower than his!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9028  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 5:51 PM
Novacek Novacek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX2030 View Post
Altamirano is estimating 350-500m per mile. What is your estimate per mile for those two lines? Hopefully it's significantly lower than his!
That isn't his estimate, those are just CapMetro's numbers straight (~10 mile system, 5B including contingency, 3.5B without).


The issue is the comparisons of those numbers to some extension built 10-15 years ago when both inflation and interest rates were near 0.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9029  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 5:55 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
Plus I'm going to publicly call out/shame Julio Gonzalez Altamirano for blocking me for pointing out his mistakes

https://twitter.com/MattNovacek/stat...47351841206272

(which he still never corrected)
Yea he’s really pissy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9030  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 6:01 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
That isn't his estimate, those are just CapMetro's numbers straight (~10 mile system, 5B including contingency, 3.5B without).


The issue is the comparisons of those numbers to some extension built 10-15 years ago when both inflation and interest rates were near 0.
So ballpark what do you think it's gonna cost per mile?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9031  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 6:26 PM
eguidry eguidry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: East Austin
Posts: 54
Couple days old and didn't see it posted elsewhere but the McNeil Bus depot is gonna get 12 acres of solar canopies with pantograph charging for the electric busses. Looks neat!

https://www.kvue.com/article/tech/sc...4-0a7bc3156b24
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9032  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2023, 8:05 PM
Novacek Novacek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX2030 View Post
So ballpark what do you think it's gonna cost per mile?
I suspect CM’s numbers are close (it’s their job after all). With luck, they’re being slightly over conservative.

Anyone thinking you can get a brand new system for 200M (because of some suburban extension 10 years, when you could borrow money at basically 0 interest) is going to be disappointed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9033  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2023, 3:59 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 802
ATP Rider Estimates for the 5 proposed routes

https://www.atptx.org/docs/libraries...rsn=aeee5ed4_1

Looks like NLTC to Pleasant Valley would have the highest ridership using 2040 estimates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9034  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 2:33 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 802
Austin nears decision on light-rail routes with public comment period closing tonight

KUT 90.5 | By Nathan Bernier
Published May 2, 2023 at 6:01 AM CDT

https://www.kut.org/transportation/2...losing-tonight
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9035  
Old Posted May 2, 2023, 7:38 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 802
Troxclair's billed passed the House now on to the Senate. Amended the bill to include loans as well.

Nathan Bernier
@KUTnathan

https://twitter.com/KUTnathan/status...63605646376961
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9036  
Old Posted May 3, 2023, 3:38 PM
paul78701 paul78701 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX2030 View Post
ATP Rider Estimates for the 5 proposed routes

https://www.atptx.org/docs/libraries...rsn=aeee5ed4_1

Looks like NLTC to Pleasant Valley would have the highest ridership using 2040 estimates.
At the rate that ABIA traffic is increasing, I'm wondering if their model they may be underestimating trips to/from the potential airport stop? Hopefully, their model is properly taking that future air traffic into consideration.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9037  
Old Posted May 3, 2023, 7:50 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul78701 View Post
At the rate that ABIA traffic is increasing, I'm wondering if their model they may be underestimating trips to/from the potential airport stop? Hopefully, their model is properly taking that future air traffic into consideration.
If you read the report, it is clear they are attempting to take airport growth into account within the parameters of the FTA model, but even so, airport ridership pales in comparison to weekday ridership of other employment and residential centers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9038  
Old Posted May 3, 2023, 9:21 PM
paul78701 paul78701 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
If you read the report, it is clear they are attempting to take airport growth into account within the parameters of the FTA model, but even so, airport ridership pales in comparison to weekday ridership of other employment and residential centers.
I haven't read it. I never doubted that they're trying to model airport growth. I'm just wondering if they're able to really do so accurately (maybe a better word than "properly"). It seems that past estimates of future ABIA traffic have been way off.

I wasn't trying to compare the ABIA proposed route to the others. I was more wondering how it could affect future line extension decisions (assuming the ABIA route isn't initially chosen).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9039  
Old Posted May 4, 2023, 4:33 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
Austin no longer has minimum parking requirements! Hopefully developers and financiers will eventually come around to realizing that less parking can be better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9040  
Old Posted May 4, 2023, 5:14 PM
dilliam dilliam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
Austin no longer has minimum parking requirements! Hopefully developers and financiers will eventually come around to realizing that less parking can be better.
I was at council this morning. You could definitely feel the excitement in the room. Passed 10-1 with bad Alter the only "no".
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.