HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2021, 8:33 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 6,863
Almost half a million US households lack indoor plumbing

From The Guardian:


Almost half a million US households lack indoor plumbing: ‘The conditions are inhumane’

Nina Lakhani in New York, Maanvi Singh in San Francisco and graphics by Rashida Kamal
Mon 27 Sep 2021 05.30 EDT


Renters and people of color are most likely to be living without water or flushing toilets in some of America’s wealthiest cities, new research shows

Yan Yu Lin and her seven-year-old daughter live in a tight studio in San Francisco’s Chinatown, in a century-old building where 60 or so residents on each floor share a bathroom.

Along the back wall of the room is a plastic potty – the kind designed for toilet training toddlers. The shared bathrooms are out of order so often, so rank and unhygienic, that Lin has her daughter use the plastic potty instead. “It’s safer,” she said.

This Dickensian-sounding living situation is more common in the US than most would think.

Almost half a million American households lack basic indoor plumbing, with renters and people of color in some of the country’s wealthiest and fastest growing cities most likely to be living without running water or flushing toilets, new research reveals.

While some rural and indigenous communities have never had indoor plumbing, the vast majority of unplumbed Americans are in fact found in urban areas, with one in three affected households living in just 15 cities, according to research by the Plumbing Poverty Project (PPP), a collaboration between King’s College London (KCL) and the University of Arizona.

The full analysis, based on data from annual community surveys by the US Census Bureau, is published today in collaboration with the Guardian as part of our long-running series exposing America’s water crisis.

It reveals how so-called plumbing poverty has gotten markedly worse in San Francisco and Portland – two booming ostensibly progressive west coast tech hubs with a growing wealth gap and homelessness crisis.

In San Francisco, which has the third most billionaires of any city in the world, almost 15,000 families live in homes without proper plumbing. Median house prices have tripled since 2000 while the number of families in substandard housing with incomplete plumbing increased by 12%.

Plumbing poverty, like all hardships in the US, is racialized: as of 2017, Black people made up 9% of San Francisco’s population but accounted for 17% of households without indoor plumbing.

“The story of plumbing poverty in San Francisco is inextricably tied to unaffordable housing, declining incomes, post-recession transformations in the California rental sector, and racialized wealth gaps, fueled by a kind of ‘anti-Black urbanism’ that has either driven Black San Franciscans into more precarious housing conditions or out of the Bay entirely,” said Katie Meehan, lead researcher of the PPP and professor of environment and society at KCL.

The problem is nationwide.

Even though plumbing poverty appears to have declined in several major cities including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago over the past two decades, tens of thousands of residents continue to rely on public restrooms, school showers and chamber pots.

In 2017, after a period of sustained economic growth following the Great Recession, at least 28,000 households in New York and 19,000 in LA still lacked basic indoor plumbing. And the progress made could actually be inflated due to the Census Bureau eliminating one of the three survey plumbing questions in 2015.

Meanwhile other cities including Milwaukee, San Antonio, Phoenix, Nashville, Seattle and Cleveland made little or no progress in tackling plumbing poverty between 2000 and 2017. The stagnation reflects a combination of factors including the legacy of historic racist housing policies, decades of underinvestment in water and sanitation infrastructure, and widening income inequalities since the Great Recession.

In Phoenix, one of the fastest growing sunbelt cities in the south-west, renters are earning less and paying more to live in homes without running water compared to two decades ago. In 2017, unplumbed renters on average spent 43% of their monthly income on rent compared to 25% in 2000.

Overall, progress to eradicate plumbing poverty remains slow: in 2017, there were still enough Americans living without piped water to fill the nation’s seventh-largest city.

“It’s not only that the gap between the water-rich and the water-poor is widening in America, it’s also that it’s driven by a housing sector that lacks any safety net for working families, especially households of color, that cannot afford the astronomical prices of San Francisco, Seattle, or now even Portland,” added Meehan.

The PPP white paper, which focuses on the 15 worst cities, is intended as blueprint for lawmakers to tackle gaps in research and infrastructure funding to end plumbing poverty – which is essential if every American household is to one day have access to affordable water and sanitation.

Clean, safe, affordable water and sanitation are essential for human health, economic prosperity and environmental justice. Yet when Covid struck and public health experts recommended regular hand washing to curtail the spread, an estimated quarter of the world’s population, 2 billion people, lacked clean running water, while almost half did not have access to proper sanitation, according to UN figures.

While the vast majority live in developing countries, at least 1.1 million people in the US, ostensibly the richest country in the world, also suffer the indignity of living in homes without running water, an indoor shower or bath, or flush toilet – because of incomplete plumbing. An additional 16 million people or so lose access every year when disconnected due to unaffordable, unpaid water bills.

‘There was nowhere for me to go’

Before the pandemic, when schools were open for in person classes, Lin’s daughter knew to use the toilets before coming home. After schools, businesses and even park amenities closed down, and families without plumbing like Lin’s were increasingly forced to rely on bottled water, wipes, potties and commodes.

Lin recalled one occasion last year when she fell ill with an upset stomach and the bathroom on her floor was out of order. She rushed down one floor, but the bathroom was occupied, as was the one on the next floor. “You can imagine how embarrassing that was,” she said. “I was ashamed. And I couldn’t even clean myself up afterwards – there was nowhere for me to go.”

Her landlord usually patches up the problem within a day or two, by pumping out the drains or tightening leaky faucets, but the ancient plumbing keeps giving out, week after week.

The situation is difficult for her to talk about. When she moved to San Francisco from China, Lin never imagined living like this. “When I speak to my dad back home, I try not to give him too many details about my life here,” she said. “I don’t want to make him upset.”

She is not alone. Renters make up fewer than half of households in the San Francisco metro area, but account for almost 90% of its plumbing poverty.

Yet often, those without plumbing spend more on rent than those with running water and flush toilets. In 2017 the average unplumbed renter in San Francisco spent 44% of their monthly income to live in a home without piped running water, while the typical city resident spent 32% on a home with full plumbing.

In other words, renters with incomplete plumbing are a growing subclass in one of the richest and so-called progressive US cities, according to the PPP analysis.

The new data reinforces earlier findings, including a 2019 report by the non-profit Pacific Institute that estimated 140,000 people in California had incomplete plumbing. The true number is undoubtedly much higher, as excluded from the count were the growing number of Bay Area residents living in mobile homes without water hookups and families who informally rent garage units or sheds.

“Lots of people were using chamber pots,” said Laura Feinstein, who co-authored the report.

In cities like San Francisco and New York, the problem is particularly marked in single room occupancy buildings – housing units with shared bathrooms like Lin’s, which are concentrated in neighborhoods mostly populated by poor and working class families of color.

Nationwide, plumbing poverty is usually clustered in small pockets, reflecting historical racist housing and infrastructure policies which have long discriminated against communities of color and tribes.

“It’s a confluence of forces and the underlying causes will depend on where you live, but the social safety net – including infrastructure spending – being hollowed out over the last 40 to 50 years, has impacted people everywhere. The role of race and structural racism is enormous,” said Stephen Gasteyer, associate professor of sociology at Michigan State University who researches water access.

Overall, federal funding for water and wastewater infrastructure has declined steadily since its peak in 1977, making it harder for underserved communities to get financial support to build and maintain systems.

As investment stagnated, new problems converged with old ones. In addition to installing indoor plumbing in homes across the country, millions of lead lines still need to be replaced, meanwhile new contaminants like PFAS and microplastics have emerged as significant health hazards.

“It’s solvable, but we’ve spent decades creating this crisis so getting out of it will take some time, money and creativity to rethink how we do infrastructure so that we can deal with emerging contaminants and deliver affordable water to everyone,” said Gasteyer.

The Bipartisan Plan that passed the Senate included $48.4bn – less than half what Biden proposed – for water programs over five years, including $15bn for lead and $15bn for PFAS, as well as $3.5bn for sanitation projects on indigenous lands.

It’s simply not enough, and means millions of Americans will continue to live without clean, safe affordable water for years to come.

Until recently Rosa Ramiréz and her two daughters lived in a studio apartment without a working bathroom in San Francisco’s Mission District, a historically working class Latino neighborhood that has rapidly gentrified, sending rents sky high. The sink spewed yellow colored water, and the toilet wasn’t properly connected to the building’s plumbing system. Ramiréz’s rent was $2,300 a month.

For two years, whenever she and her daughters needed to use the toilet or wash up, they relied on restrooms at the local donut shop, cafe or taqueria.

When the pandemic hit, the situation became untenable. With schools shut down, her daughters aged eight and 15 could no longer use the facilities on campus. “It was unbearable,” said Ramiréz, 49, who works as a cleaner. “The hardest part was when one of us had a stomach ache and none of the restaurants wanted to lend me their restroom.”

The landlord refused to fix the bathroom, and it took months for Ramirez to find another studio as rents have become so unaffordable in the neighborhood. “It has been increasingly difficult to live here,” said Ramiréz. “The conditions now are inhumane.”

Click the link to see graphs and pictures.

Link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...unSvmGCeTwrURc
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2021, 9:07 PM
hauntedheadnc's Avatar
hauntedheadnc hauntedheadnc is offline
A gruff individual.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greenville, SC - "Birthplace of the light switch rave"
Posts: 13,438
I remember helping remove a child from a residence that didn't have indoor plumbing. The family was shitting in a bucket in the corner. Mind you, they'd had to move into the shed because they had turned their trailer into a meth lab...
__________________
"To sustain the life of a large, modern city in this cloying, clinging heat is an amazing achievement. It is no wonder that the white men and women in Greenville walk with a slow, dragging pride, as if they had taken up a challenge and intended to defy it without end." -- Rebecca West for The New Yorker, 1947
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2021, 11:23 PM
llamaorama llamaorama is offline
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,212
Those people in SF, geez you know it's time to GTFO of that city.

It would be interesting to see the data. I'm willing to bet that there's no one type of "plumbing poverty" but rather very different and distinct groups, like:

1. People in illegal units in hyper-expensive cities.
2. Native Americans living in geographically remote locations.
3. Appalachia
4. Colonias

Last edited by llamaorama; Sep 27, 2021 at 11:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2021, 11:51 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,773
So this is a weird article, bc they're conflating two things. It's one thing for a SFH to not have indoor plumbing, but it's quite common for SRO multfamily units to not have unit bathrooms.

But obviously the apartment buildings have indoor plumbing, it's just shared bathrooms and kitchens, like in a dormitory or fraternity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2021, 12:08 AM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 6,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
So this is a weird article, bc they're conflating two things. It's one thing for a SFH to not have indoor plumbing, but it's quite common for SRO multfamily units to not have unit bathrooms.

But obviously the apartment buildings have indoor plumbing, it's just shared bathrooms and kitchens, like in a dormitory or fraternity.
Well, it's about the plumbing-poor. The very first paragraph mentions 60 residents on one floor sharing *one* bathroom, which often doesn't even function.

This, in a so-called developed country.
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2021, 12:09 AM
ocman ocman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Burlingame
Posts: 2,691
I’m continually shocked with how behind the times SF can be with things everyone else take for granted outside of the city. Mostly from the lack of will of the city to constantly talk but never do anything about these things. That people are paying and still using chamber pots like you’re downstairs in Downton Abbey is outrageous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 1:56 AM
Manitopiaaa Manitopiaaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alexandria, Royal Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 494
500,000 households out of how many? 125,000,000? This doesn't look like a major issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 2:06 AM
Manitopiaaa Manitopiaaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alexandria, Royal Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally Posted by sopas ej View Post
Well, it's about the plumbing-poor. The very first paragraph mentions 60 residents on one floor sharing *one* bathroom, which often doesn't even function.

This, in a so-called developed country.
This is not unique to the U.S. (https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...drinking-water) and implying the U.S. is a third world country ("so-called developed") may be edgy and get you tankie upvotes on Reddit, but it's objectively absurd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 2:15 AM
James Bond Agent 007's Avatar
James Bond Agent 007 James Bond Agent 007 is offline
Posh
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
Posts: 21,157
50 years ago I visited my grandmother in the boonies in central Florida, and me and my sisters slept in this accessory building that my mother and her siblings used to sleep in, and it had no plumbing at all. The bathroom was an outhouse. I can imagine there's still stuff like that here and there in rural areas.
__________________
"There's two kinds of men in the world. Those who have a crush on Linda Ronstadt, and those who never heard of her." - Willie Nelson
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 2:25 AM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manitopiaaa View Post
500,000 households out of how many? 125,000,000? This doesn't look like a major issue.
99%+ Americans live comically easy lives. No hard labor, no regular physical danger. Quite literally, as a postwar American you have to seek out physical danger (mountain climbing, whitewater kayaking, squirrel suits, wrestling alligators, motorcycle racing/jumping, etc.). Wolves and grisly bears are out in the middle of nowhere, it's unlikely that you're going to have a gun pointed at you unless you're involved in drug dealing or other crime, there is no military draft.

People have so much free time that they're able to get worked up over non-issues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 2:50 AM
llamaorama llamaorama is offline
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post

People have so much free time that they're able to get worked up over non-issues.
Actually yes, it is kind of a big deal to not have a clean place to use the bathroom, this is sort of a universal truth of civilization. Since we aren't living in the wilderness and can't take a shit behind a tree and then drink from a stream located uphill, it matters.

Using an outhouse: transmission of easily preventable diseases and pollution of water supply. Remember hookworms? Montezuma's revenge?
Using a shared bathroom with 60 people: not being able to keep up with hygiene, lack of personal safety, more disease spread.

But yeah, why don't you drag a toddler that shit its pants down to the one functioning toilet in a taqueria because you don't have one at home and then tell these people they have it easy?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 9:53 AM
hauntedheadnc's Avatar
hauntedheadnc hauntedheadnc is offline
A gruff individual.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greenville, SC - "Birthplace of the light switch rave"
Posts: 13,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond Agent 007 View Post
50 years ago I visited my grandmother in the boonies in central Florida, and me and my sisters slept in this accessory building that my mother and her siblings used to sleep in, and it had no plumbing at all. The bathroom was an outhouse. I can imagine there's still stuff like that here and there in rural areas.
Both of my parents, with my dad making the scene in 1946 and my mom in 1948, grew up without indoor plumbing. It was, quite literally, outhouses and the Sears catalog for them both. The thing about outhouses though, is that they do eventually fill and have to be moved, but what can you do with the plot where the outhouse used to be?

Well, when I was a kid, my parents used to have a huge vegetable garden on my grandmother's land because we didn't have any space for it where we lived. And my dad had no trouble at all growing massive -- truly massive, easily at least a hundred pounds -- pumpkins on this one particular corner of the garden. I asked him the secret one day, and he remarked offhandedly that that was where the outhouse used to be. Mystery solved!
__________________
"To sustain the life of a large, modern city in this cloying, clinging heat is an amazing achievement. It is no wonder that the white men and women in Greenville walk with a slow, dragging pride, as if they had taken up a challenge and intended to defy it without end." -- Rebecca West for The New Yorker, 1947
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 11:16 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocman View Post
I’m continually shocked with how behind the times SF can be with things everyone else take for granted outside of the city. Mostly from the lack of will of the city to constantly talk but never do anything about these things. That people are paying and still using chamber pots like you’re downstairs in Downton Abbey is outrageous.
SRO housing is cheap housing for a reason. Cities are trying to preserve this type of housing, not destroy it. SROs are typically occupied by single, transient men, often immigrants, who don't mind sharing bathrooms in exchange for cheap rent. They just want a bed in a convenient location.

So if you "fixed" this problem, it would destroy a much needed housing typology and probably lead to more homelessness.

And, again, I'm still not understanding why the article is grouping SROs with SFHs that lack indoor plumbing. They're totally different typologies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 12:33 PM
eschaton eschaton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
SRO housing is cheap housing for a reason. Cities are trying to preserve this type of housing, not destroy it. SROs are typically occupied by single, transient men, often immigrants, who don't mind sharing bathrooms in exchange for cheap rent. They just want a bed in a convenient location.

So if you "fixed" this problem, it would destroy a much needed housing typology and probably lead to more homelessness.

And, again, I'm still not understanding why the article is grouping SROs with SFHs that lack indoor plumbing. They're totally different typologies.
I read an article a few years back which went into the tensions between "housing standards" and "housing affordability." Essentially prior to the New Deal there was never an issue with affordable housing, because there were no real building codes, meaning you could build shanties with no indoor plumbing which were fire/disease hazards. This spurred public panic about low-quality housing, so minimum standards were set. But this also meant for the first time there was a minimum cost for housing which was too high for "the market" to provide for, which necessitated the beginnings of public housing.

Over time, the standards for "safe" construction have risen, meaning the costs of the cheapest possible units has also risen. Of course, other aspects, such zoning requirements and rising pay for construction workers also played a role. It used to be be legal, for example, to buy a "kit" house and put it together over a period of many years, but permitting requirements made this almost impossible unless you hired a team of professional builders.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 12:44 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 6,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
And, again, I'm still not understanding why the article is grouping SROs with SFHs that lack indoor plumbing. They're totally different typologies.
I think you're hung up on the housing types. Forest through the trees.

The article is talking about the *plumbing poor*. Those 60 or so residents on one floor aren't living in one household sharing one bathroom, they're basically a bunch of individual households with no individual bathrooms, having to share one common bathroom on a floor of a building. I don't know about you, but I don't consider that immediate access to bathrooms. Can you imagine having to get ready for work, or just taking a dump, under those conditions?

Plumbing poor.
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 1:23 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
I read an article a few years back which went into the tensions between "housing standards" and "housing affordability." Essentially prior to the New Deal there was never an issue with affordable housing, because there were no real building codes, meaning you could build shanties with no indoor plumbing which were fire/disease hazards. This spurred public panic about low-quality housing, so minimum standards were set. But this also meant for the first time there was a minimum cost for housing which was too high for "the market" to provide for, which necessitated the beginnings of public housing.

Over time, the standards for "safe" construction have risen, meaning the costs of the cheapest possible units has also risen. Of course, other aspects, such zoning requirements and rising pay for construction workers also played a role. It used to be be legal, for example, to buy a "kit" house and put it together over a period of many years, but permitting requirements made this almost impossible unless you hired a team of professional builders.

Yeah, no kidding. About 20 years ago I read a late-1800s description of the people who lined the riverbanks of America's inland cities in homemade rafts. Hundreds (or perhaps thousands) of people built their own floating house boats out of scrap wood, tied them up to trees, and that's where they lived.

I heard a guy on the radio describe how he was housing 8 or 10 Mexican workers in the basement of his rental. He said they all paid on time every month because they knew they had a good setup compared to what else is out there for illegal migrant workers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 2:02 PM
montréaliste montréaliste is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chambly, Quebec
Posts: 2,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by sopas ej View Post
I think you're hung up on the housing types. Forest through the trees.

The article is talking about the *plumbing poor*. Those 60 or so residents on one floor aren't living in one household sharing one bathroom, they're basically a bunch of individual households with no individual bathrooms, having to share one common bathroom on a floor of a building. I don't know about you, but I don't consider that immediate access to bathrooms. Can you imagine having to get ready for work, or just taking a dump, under those conditions?

Plumbing poor.

Just. That. Not lol. lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 2:41 PM
eschaton eschaton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
I heard a guy on the radio describe how he was housing 8 or 10 Mexican workers in the basement of his rental. He said they all paid on time every month because they knew they had a good setup compared to what else is out there for illegal migrant workers.
A former coworker of mine used to work in legal aid in South Florida. He got a call from a migrant farmworker who said he was kicked out of his trailer for being Mexican. He ultimately confronted the owner - and was surprised to see the owner was Mexican as well. The owner explained that yes, he kicked the guy out because he was Mexican - because he couldn't rent out the trailer space to any more than three Mexicans, while he could fit ten Guatemalans in there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 2:53 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
A former coworker of mine used to work in legal aid in South Florida. He got a call from a migrant farmworker who said he was kicked out of his trailer for being Mexican. He ultimately confronted the owner - and was surprised to see the owner was Mexican as well. The owner explained that yes, he kicked the guy out because he was Mexican - because he couldn't rent out the trailer space to any more than three Mexicans, while he could fit ten Guatemalans in there.
Yeah, Guatemalans are really small.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2021, 3:07 PM
eschaton eschaton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 5,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post
Yeah, Guatemalans are really small.
I'm guessing part of it too is the Guatemalans were okay with "hot bunking" while the Mexicans all wanted their own beds, even if not their own bedrooms.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.