HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 3:52 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegoatman View Post
... it's replacing some nondescript brick building with an exclusive hotel, lots of retail adding to Michigan ave, and apartments.
CitizenM is exclusive, really? I thought it was a bargain eurotrash chain.


New York Times
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 4:20 PM
rivernorthlurker rivernorthlurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
CitizenM is exclusive, really? I thought it was a bargain eurotrash chain.


New York Times
I was in the CitizenM in NYC in Bowery, both the lobby and sky lounge. Honestly it was super nice and I had friends staying there that loved it. Yeah I wouldn't characterize it as 'exclusive' for sure, ie it's not the Langham but it's definitely a great addition to Chicago's hotel lineup IMO. I like that Chicago is getting some Euro flair even if it is botique. Makes for good Instagramming.

From https://www.citizenm.com/hotels/unit...k-bowery-hotel



Saw article that said 280 rooms which is a pretty good size (probably because rooms are tiny). Honestly I think it will reflect well on the city and make Michigan Ave a little more modern/hip.
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 4:26 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by rivernorthlurker View Post
I was in the CitizenM in NYC in Bowery, both the lobby and sky lounge. Honestly it was super nice and I had friends staying there that loved it. Yeah I wouldn't characterize it as 'exclusive' for sure, ie it's not the Langham but it's definitely a great addition to Chicago's hotel lineup IMO. I like that Chicago is getting some Euro flair even if it is botique. Makes for good Instagramming.
Well that's a relief.
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2022, 4:58 AM
kolchak's Avatar
kolchak kolchak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Are glass boxes supposed to be anything but flat and boring?
Yes agree. The problems with this building imho ARE the V columns and off base. A well executed glass box with the curtain wall extending straight down flush to the sidewalk might have been pulled off here - but this is a hopelessly compromized design. I thought it had a chance but it just looks like another pedistal on a podium.
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2022, 7:10 PM
SpireGuy's Avatar
SpireGuy SpireGuy is offline
Making Chicago Memorable.
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 161
This building is terrible. I wish it had not been built.
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2022, 7:33 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by rivernorthlurker View Post
It has some horizontal white lines on 3 sides at least .
Only on the lower hotel levels. It's like they gave up on the upper portion and asked the accountants to design it.
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2022, 8:03 PM
Toasty Joe Toasty Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago, IL
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolarWind View Post
November 22, 2021

Not to mention the one embellishment they chose to include doesn't even line up with the edge of the building (or the other set?). Design obviously wasn't a priority for the developers, and it shows.
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2022, 8:03 PM
rivernorthlurker rivernorthlurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Only on the lower hotel levels. It's like they gave up on the upper portion and asked the accountants to design it.
Ha, yeah. I think on the east side you are right. On the other 3 sides though I believe they go all the way up.
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2022, 8:22 PM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,798
I'm not a fan of the final design either, but it could have been worse.

     
     
  #370  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2022, 10:01 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,014
Maybe my opinion will improve slightly when the skip comes down and the vertical "slice" near the northeast corner materializes. I doubt it though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty Joe View Post
They definitely could've repurposed the original building (or at least a facadectomy) and build a tall, modern hotel above. Maybe in a bronze finish akin to 9 Dekalb to complement the C&C building next door.
Even if they didn't save the old commercial building, a facade similar to 9 Dekalb would have been incredible at this site. 9 Dekalb is my favorite UC building in the world.

I wish SHoP's designers would come to Chicago and save us from ourselves.
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 1:54 AM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,046
What do they do with those old water towers on top of buildings after their dismantled? Wish we had a museum of Chicago ones.
     
     
  #372  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 4:37 AM
pip's Avatar
pip pip is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,038
Lol this is going to be a CitizenM. I went to Boston late November and booked there for a week and a half and paid from here in Chicago thinking I would work from a desk in the hotel room. The room was tiny tiny and the desk was 1.5 feet in width and 1 foot in depth. I checked out the next morning. But alas this was all my fault for not looking into the hotel. The hotel gears towards a demographic I wasn't looking for. But I must say the customer service was excellent. The customer service was polite and attentive and fast. They refunded my money even though I booked and paid through a third party app. Everything was really clean and was geared for something I wasn't looking for. But if I was looking for what the hotel offers this would have been excellent. I think having CitizenM in Chicago will be a good thing. To bad about the old brick building going away though.
     
     
  #373  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 7:22 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty Joe View Post
this is the worst kind of filler... it takes away from the built environment with its blasé curtain wall, mediocre height, and thoughtless positioning (blocking a historic view of the C&C building)
Spot on, the tower itself is fine, but for that sight there should have been better consideration with it's surroundings. Even just a modest setback or two could have done wonders with the design of this building, plus that could have been a trade off to give it more height while also protecting the view of the C&C building.
     
     
  #374  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 8:02 AM
rivernorthlurker rivernorthlurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip View Post
Lol this is going to be a CitizenM. I went to Boston late November and booked there for a week and a half and paid from here in Chicago thinking I would work from a desk in the hotel room. The room was tiny tiny and the desk was 1.5 feet in width and 1 foot in depth. I checked out the next morning. But alas this was all my fault for not looking into the hotel. The hotel gears towards a demographic I wasn't looking for. But I must say the customer service was excellent. The customer service was polite and attentive and fast. They refunded my money even though I booked and paid through a third party app. Everything was really clean and was geared for something I wasn't looking for. But if I was looking for what the hotel offers this would have been excellent. I think having CitizenM in Chicago will be a good thing. To bad about the old brick building going away though.
Yeah as mentioned above I visited some friends staying in one in New York. It's basically ultra small rooms at affordable price but with very nice finishes/customer service/amenities that a more expensive hotel would have. If you're not aware of this when booking I'm sure it would be a bit of a shock. But for locals this should be a nice place to enjoy the bar/patio/roof or whatever they have.

Agreed it's a win to have this option and adds tot the diversity of hotel options available in the city. Kind of like the relatively new Moxy in River North which a lot of people seem to love staying in.
     
     
  #375  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2022, 10:19 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty Joe View Post
Not to mention the one embellishment they chose to include doesn't even line up with the edge of the building (or the other set?). Design obviously wasn't a priority for the developers, and it shows.
embarrassing. my 80 year old back porch has a tighter tolerance than that
     
     
  #376  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2022, 10:51 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,989
Jan 7





__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
     
     
  #377  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2022, 11:29 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,415
Well, its a 500 footer. Add it to the big board, and lets move on.

Great shots as always, Harry!
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
     
     
  #378  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 12:44 AM
Drcastro Drcastro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: SW Mpls
Posts: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by kolchak View Post
Yes agree. The problems with this building imho ARE the V columns and off base. A well executed glass box with the curtain wall extending straight down flush to the sidewalk might have been pulled off here - but this is a hopelessly compromized design. I thought it had a chance but it just looks like another pedistal on a podium.
A pedestal and a podium are basically the same thing.
     
     
  #379  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 1:14 AM
thegoatman thegoatman is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryc View Post
Jan 7





Good infill. Don't understand the hate. Nice blend of classical and new architecture, and it looks good from the brown line flyover and coming north up michigan ave. Not everything needs to be a supertall, now the salesforce tower should've been that.
     
     
  #380  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2022, 5:06 AM
gandalf612 gandalf612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Edgewater, Chicago
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by thegoatman View Post
Good infill. Don't understand the hate. Nice blend of classical and new architecture, and it looks good from the brown line flyover and coming north up michigan ave. Not everything needs to be a supertall, now the salesforce tower should've been that.
There is absolutely no way this is visible from the flyover
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.