HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:01 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernie mac View Post
Your point is pointless since they make the VAST majority of the money.
No. My point is that they pay the majority of taxes and if they left(or even a small minority of them) NYC would be in a world of pain.

Your political point doesn't change that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:07 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
Businesses may move out of NYC, remote workers may move out of NYC.

A family making 400k MIGHT NOT think Florida is a cesspool of disgustingness like you imagine. Or Texas, some people like places like that, even wealthy people (shocker).
But there aren't a lot of jobs in Florida that command those salaries. For all this talk about Florida's low taxes, it's still a fairly poor state. Of the 10 largest states, Florida ranks second to last in per capita income. And of all states, it ranks #38.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:12 PM
bernie mac bernie mac is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
No. My point is that they pay the majority of taxes and if they left(or even a small minority of them) NYC would be in a world of pain.
No, they would simply be replaced.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:16 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
But there aren't a lot of jobs in Florida that command those salaries. For all this talk about Florida's low taxes, it's still a fairly poor state. Of the 10 largest states, Florida ranks second to last in per capita income. And of all states, it ranks #38.
I am talking about people doing remote work, moving to a second house to avoid NYC taxes(they can work from the phone), and companies and their employees moving.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:19 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernie mac View Post
No, they would simply be replaced.
That's the educated response I would expect from someone like you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:24 PM
bernie mac bernie mac is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
That's the educated response I would expect from someone like you.
I want to be smarter like you! How much boot do I have to lick before my IQ reaches your level?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:26 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
But there aren't a lot of jobs in Florida that command those salaries. For all this talk about Florida's low taxes, it's still a fairly poor state. Of the 10 largest states, Florida ranks second to last in per capita income. And of all states, it ranks #38.
As everyone says, it's rich with retirees and retirees don't generally have high incomes but they don't need them. Their homes are often paid for. They don't need business wardrobes or have the cost of commuting. A day on the community golf course or fishing off the pier or from a small boat isn't that expensive.

But Florida does have enclaves for the rich and not just Palm Beach:


https://www.google.com/search?rls=en...q-hvoR7usNxreM
Clubhouse of Sawgrass golf resort in Ponte Vedra near Jacksonville
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:38 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
I am talking about people doing remote work, moving to a second house to avoid NYC taxes(they can work from the phone), and companies and their employees moving.
Those people who can do that are gone anyway. Even if the tax rate were 0%, I don't really get why someone would work a 100% remote role in NYC with no other obligations that keeps them here. It's expensive, the weather is kind of terrible, and the living spaces are small. New York will never compete with Florida on weather or cost of living.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:47 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernie mac View Post
I want to be smarter like you! How much boot do I have to lick before my IQ reaches your level?
Can we somehow ban people under a certain posting level from posting in general discussions? lol


What does liking or hating police have to do with the fact that the NYC rich fund most of the cities budget?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:50 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Those people who can do that are gone anyway. Even if the tax rate were 0%, I don't really get why someone would work a 100% remote role in NYC with no other obligations that keeps them here. It's expensive, the weather is kind of terrible, and the living spaces are small. New York will never compete with Florida on weather or cost of living.


We have forumers on here that are convinced WFH will actually grow central cities as people have more options to live the lifestyle they want. I tend to disagree, but there will always be a subset of people, including the rich, who stay in cities because of things they like that are unique to that location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:52 PM
TexasPlaya's Avatar
TexasPlaya TexasPlaya is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ATX-HTOWN
Posts: 18,367
I think it's pretty reasonable to see NYC having another cycle where it stagnates or even steps back due to a combination of an aging population, technology, and taxes (which also relates to demographics).

Hopefully we won't won't be making a new Escape From New York movie.
__________________
"A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in."

"Such then is the human condition , that to wish greatness for one's country is to wish harm to one's neighbor" Voltaire
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 9:57 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
We have forums on here that are convinced WFH will actually grow central cities as people have more options to live the lifestyle they want. I tend to disagree, but there will always be a subset of people, including the rich, who stay in cities because of things they like that are unique to that location.
I disagree with them too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 10:12 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasPlaya View Post
I think it's pretty reasonable to see NYC having another cycle where it stagnates or even steps back due to a combination of an aging population, technology, and taxes (which also relates to demographics).

Hopefully we won't won't be making a new Escape From New York movie.
Does it need Rudi redux?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 10:12 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
I disagree with them too.
The problem for NYC (and SF and Boston) is that they're super expensive, so if you just want to live in ANY city, they wouldn't be the top choice.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 10:34 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post
The problem for NYC (and SF and Boston) is that they're super expensive, so if you just want to live in ANY city, they wouldn't be the top choice.
Yeah, that may have a limited benefit to a lower cost city. If I were remote and just wanted to be in a walkable city, I'd probably choose Philadelphia or Chicago, assuming I was still receiving a NYC or Bay Area salary.

But, I think the number of workers that will be permanently untethered from their desks in SF or NYC is being vastly overestimated. And even if they all were, it wouldn't really make a difference to any single city if those workers fanned out across the country indiscriminately. If every single high-income person drained out of NYC and spread out evenly to the other top 10 metros, it would barely register in those other metros.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 10:49 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Yeah, that may have a limited benefit to a lower cost city. If I were remote and just wanted to be in a walkable city, I'd probably choose Philadelphia or Chicago, assuming I was still receiving a NYC or Bay Area salary.

But, I think the number of workers that will be permanently untethered from their desks in SF or NYC is being vastly overestimated. And even if they all were, it wouldn't really make a difference to any single city if those workers fanned out across the country indiscriminately. If every single high-income person drained out of NYC and spread out evenly to the other top 10 metros, it would barely register in those other metros.
I agree it's being overestimated, especially for NYC. SF and Seattle are likely the biggest losers since software development is much more amenable to remote-only than a lot of other jobs.
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 10:50 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 38,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasPlaya View Post
I think it's pretty reasonable to see NYC having another cycle where it stagnates or even steps back due to a combination of an aging population, technology, and taxes (which also relates to demographics).

Hopefully we won't won't be making a new Escape From New York movie.
Speak for yourself. Snake Plissken needs to make an appearance at the M&M store.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 10:59 PM
edale edale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,237
I have no idea if this stat has already been shared here, but I just saw this excerpt from a Bloomberg article called "What Happens When the 1% Go Remote":

"A whopping 80% of NYC's income tax revenue comes from the 17% of its residents who earn $100,000+ per year. If just 5% of those folks decided to move away, it would cost the city almost one billion ($933 million) in lost tax revenue."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 11:01 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by edale View Post
I have no idea if this stat has already been shared here, but I just saw this excerpt from a Bloomberg article called "What Happens When the 1% Go Remote":

"A whopping 80% of NYC's income tax revenue comes from the 17% of its residents who earn $100,000+ per year. If just 5% of those folks decided to move away, it would cost the city almost one billion ($933 million) in lost tax revenue."
if they still work "in" NYC, even remotely, won't they still pay NYC tax?
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2021, 11:14 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post
I agree it's being overestimated, especially for NYC. SF and Seattle are likely the biggest losers since software development is much more amenable to remote-only than a lot of other jobs.
You can engineer software remotely but I question whether you can plan and design it remotely to the extent that is a creative and collaborative process which a lot of it is.

I am trying to visualize plotting a new game or business app via Zoom. I wonder if that can really work.

It's like trying to write a collaborative novel or play via Zoom. Seems cumbersome to say the least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:32 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.