HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted May 22, 2021, 11:37 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
View from the Fox Plaza of 941 Mission Street. The portable red crane immediately attracted my attention this morning. Thanks guys for the photos which told me why it was there.

My view will now have the least number of cranes in the my view in a quite a number years!

941 Mission Street, San Franciscco
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted May 25, 2021, 2:12 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,166
5M

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2021, 10:58 PM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2021, 1:00 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
looked like initial work has started on the central open space



they also appeared to be working on the little space behind the Chronicle annex. I forget right now if this is to remain open or will be swallowed by the residential building later. a new sidewalk has been constructed on that side of Mary Alley past this area



looking back the other way, toward the senior housing



from the SW corner



at the Dempster building and senior housing



new sidewalk has also gone in on the north side of Natoma, and the asphalt parking lot there has been cleared. looking west from near Fifth St



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2021, 8:30 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbad View Post
looked like initial work has started on the central open space
indeed:



looking west:



various other shots:



from Howard

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2021, 2:01 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
from Mission Bay

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2021, 4:38 AM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,166
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2021, 8:26 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150




there was some demolition happening across Howard from 5M. would be nice if this means that plot will get filled in soon, in combo with 5M will make a big difference to the northern portion of Fifth

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2021, 4:42 AM
1977's Avatar
1977 1977 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 996
Great update as usual, timbad.

Quote:
there was some demolition happening across Howard from 5M.
If I am not mistaken, that looks like 921 Howard:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2021, 6:08 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1977 View Post
... that looks like 921 Howard:
nice, thanks. I had hoped that would take care of the entire surface parking lot there, but from this site and this one, it looks like that project does not stretch all the way to Fifth, with the rest of the current lot belonging to future 206 Fifth St, an even taller tower (but assuming further off in time)

Last edited by timbad; Jun 29, 2021 at 6:37 AM. Reason: changed wording
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2021, 5:44 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
07/13/2021 - view from my window (telephoto lens). Would it have cost $1 more for the architect to have added a little interest to the west & north walls? Move along folks. There is nothing to see here.

5M San Francisco 007/13/2021
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2021, 10:58 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry of San Fran View Post
07/13/2021 - view from my window (telephoto lens). Would it have cost $1 more for the architect to have added a little interest to the west & north walls? Move along folks. There is nothing to see here.
I was thinking the other day it looks very 1960s to me. Seems like there are other towers in SF from that era that look very similar.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2021, 7:32 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
7/24/2021 - Crane being dismantled today.

5M Highrise
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2021, 9:31 PM
whitty whitty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 61
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted Jul 26, 2021, 6:22 PM
OneRinconHill OneRinconHill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 164
Gotta say, having seen this in person yesterday, I am not a fan. It's mass is huge and boring and it takes up a ton of the southern skyline view (covers the Marriott entirely, but that might be a good thing to some).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2021, 1:47 AM
iamfishhead iamfishhead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
I was thinking the other day it looks very 1960s to me. Seems like there are other towers in SF from that era that look very similar.
Yeah, it has a very 44 Montgomery look.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2021, 6:50 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneRinconHill View Post
Gotta say, having seen this in person yesterday, I am not a fan. It's mass is huge and boring and it takes up a ton of the southern skyline view (covers the Marriott entirely, but that might be a good thing to some).
Do you mean the Intercontinental across Fifth Street?

The white striped portion actually looks interesting when viewed from 101 coming north into downtown because the stripes look wavy on the south side.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2021, 3:20 PM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 706
definitely turned out bland; compare to the images in post #1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2021, 3:01 AM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,805
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2021, 5:42 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
at the senior housing on Mission, they were re-doing the sidewalk. also, the non-color-graded portion of the facade did finally get its (black) panels



from the back



Fifth St sidewalk view. I'm afraid those sea-green striped panels that look like they are surplus from the 555 Fulton project are what we are going to get at ground-floor level. doesn't seem to match the rest of the color scheme at all, and not in a good way



along the edge of the Chronicle Annex, some shaped forms are going in that could be for planters or seating. assume this is temporary until the other building goes in?



the forms in the center open space itself are interesting, but up close look cheap, like plastic, to me. they do match the color scheme of the main building, and not in a good way





I actually sort of like the industrial feeling at ground level along Howard St and Mary Alley, but I imagine that is temporary until ruined by the sea-green striping





I wonder if it is fair to say this project got its aesthetics litigated out of it
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:25 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.