HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2008, 10:16 PM
Svenn's Avatar
Svenn Svenn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 362
yeah just wait...some other city will do it in a few years and everyone will think it's revolutionary.
__________________
But, you know how it is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2008, 11:17 PM
Hawker Hawker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Svenn View Post
yeah just wait...some other city will do it in a few years and everyone will think it's revolutionary.
Toronto actually did it a few years ago, and yes it was considered fairly revolutionary then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2008, 3:57 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,892
least they are looking at fesibility of it and not just putting it up for the sake of puting one up...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2009, 2:18 AM
Tess Tess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Good idea, not so good location

Wind turbines are amazing and its nice to have other environmental energy sources available, however (and you knew there would be one), they are responsible for bird and bat deaths. The number of deaths per annum per turbine is dependent upon its location. On bat migration routes or near roost caves, high bat deaths. On ridges, high bird deaths, particularly among predator species which is a problem because they have lower population numbers in comparison with say, songbirds or waterfowl so losses are significant for the population as a whole.

As for a turbine at the Forks, the test site was about 1km from a nesting endangered species and along a major flyway for songbirds, waterfowl, shorebirds and raptors. Don't think the Riverwalk hikers, tourists, museum visitors, shoppers or guests at the Inn at the Forks would like to be dodging bird bodies.

All in all, a great idea, but a lousy location ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2009, 2:29 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tess View Post
Wind turbines are amazing and its nice to have other environmental energy sources available, however (and you knew there would be one), they are responsible for bird and bat deaths. The number of deaths per annum per turbine is dependent upon its location. On bat migration routes or near roost caves, high bat deaths. On ridges, high bird deaths, particularly among predator species which is a problem because they have lower population numbers in comparison with say, songbirds or waterfowl so losses are significant for the population as a whole.

As for a turbine at the Forks, the test site was about 1km from a nesting endangered species and along a major flyway for songbirds, waterfowl, shorebirds and raptors. Don't think the Riverwalk hikers, tourists, museum visitors, shoppers or guests at the Inn at the Forks would like to be dodging bird bodies.

All in all, a great idea, but a lousy location ...
from my understanding theres another type of wind mill that genraly has a lower number of animal deaths.... but i could be rong
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2009, 4:09 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 8,773
This project, was announced late last year that they we not proceeding with it.

It is dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2009, 4:44 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,470
i heard that the wind velocities were not adequate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2009, 5:15 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
The New Republic
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Provinces of America
Posts: 10,818
When it says 'giant' windmill are they inferring that it will be giant for a wind turbine, or regular sized for a wind turbine, but large relative to everything else?

One that's normal size for a wind turbine wouldn't be much of a symbol for the city. If you want to make a statement, this thing needs to be 200-300 metres tall. The bigger the better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2009, 5:32 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,892
if the wind had been adiquit to build one it would of been rufly the height of the richardson building from what i understand
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:17 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.