Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023
With the right job, yes. They’re not buying townhouses of course, but nowhere in Chicago is really that expensive.
|
particulalry when you factor in roommates.
after like a 10 second zillow search, i found a 3 bed/2bath 1,450 SF apartment in Lincoln Park currently for rent for $2,100/month (right near Jonquil Park and like 2 blocks from diversey brown line, so car-free would be totally doable)
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2...67934053_zpid/
split between 3 people that's only $700/month per man. i would think that most 20-something college grads in 2022 can swing that (especially without a car). you wouldn't even necessarily need a rockstar job.
Quote:
Originally Posted by liat91
Philly is a bit to far, distinct and large enough to be a secondary city in a CSA. Heck, I know quite a few people around Baltimore who would attest there should be no merging with DC.
|
yep.
the problem is that too many people equate the CSA definition with some kind of "city without municipal borders" measure, like a metro area or something, when that's not what the CSA really does. it measures economically intertwined "regions", not individual "cities".
DC and Baltimore will never be the same "city". yeah, they're very close to each other, and fairly economically intertwined these days, but there's too much history and critical mass gravity in each of them to ever be one single place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by liat91
Fort Worth, St. Paul, Tacoma, Fort Lauderdale, San Jose feel more linked in that respect.
|
st. paul, on the other hand, is fully merged with minneapolis, such that more than any other major twin city pair in the nation, they really do exist and function as one single "city" that happens to be divided into two separate municipalities, each with their own downtown. neither one stands wholly on its own, nor are either of them a suburb for the other one. in a de facto sense, it is a single city of 742K people spread across 106 sq. miles.
for starters, they
directly abut each other, sharing a 6 mile long municipal border.
their populations and sizes are pretty close; minneapolis: 430K on 54 sq. miles vs. st. paul: 312K on 52 sq. miles.
they were both incorporated very close in time. minneapolis 1867 vs. st. paul 1854.
the two downtowns are only
8.5 miles apart, connected by an intra-city light rail line, not commuter rail or amtrak.
they split major league sports. MLB, NFL, & NBA are in minneapolis. NHL & MLS are in st. paul. (notice how all the major sports teams are named "minnesota", never one city over the other).
the main art museums and convention center are in minneapolis, the main science and history museums are in st. paul.
minneapolis has the flagship university of minnesota, whereas st. paul is the state capital.
and on and on.
they really do function more like one single city with two major downtown nodes than any other large US city pair that i can think of.