HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 8:56 PM
Yuri's Avatar
Yuri Yuri is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,448
YouTube is watching us. Just posted:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AwKv3_WwD4o

“Why Los Angeles replaced its world-class transit with freeways”. Very well produced video.
__________________
London - São Paulo - Rio de Janeiro - Londrina - Frankfurt
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 9:01 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
Cars, suburbia, Freeways are NOT GOING AWAY they will never go away and they should not.

You need to learn to live with them in balance with your other urban goals.
I didn't say anything about suburbia.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Exactly. Every urban freeway in America should be ripped out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 9:37 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,472
We almost had our city torn apart by freeways in the 1960s:



I suppose the "downtown loop" would have been created by I-35 on the east, the Riverside/First Street expwy on the south, Mopac on the west and the "Crosstown" expwy to the north (roughly 15th street).

Most of today's expressways border the whole of the urban core, with the exception of I-35 which runs right beside downtown and through the east side which many would consider part of the urban core. Hopefully dreams and visions to bury I-35 through downtown eventually materialize.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 9:52 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is offline
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 37,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
I didn't say anything about suburbia.
But urban doesn't exist in a void, the hordes from suburbia
still have to get into the urban bits for work. If the 'burbs lack adequate transit options (most do), urban freeways are still vital even in city centers. Only hope is for most companies to go remote and de-emphasize the need for commuting infrastructure; freeways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 9:58 PM
RCDC's Avatar
RCDC RCDC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: DC, an eruptive vent of wealth
Posts: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
Cars, suburbia, Freeways are NOT GOING AWAY they will never go away and they should not.

You need to learn to live with them in balance with your other urban goals.
Urban areas subsidize sprawl. Suburbia is essentially welfare dependent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 10:23 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCDC View Post
Urban areas subsidize sprawl. Suburbia is essentially welfare dependent.
Yeah yeah, okay okay, Doesnt matter its not going away .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 10:27 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is offline
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 37,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCDC View Post
Urban areas subsidize sprawl. Suburbia is essentially welfare dependent.
Suburban areas also largely supply the workforce in most urban areas so it's not as simplistic as one subsidizes the other. Also, many suburbanites don't use mass transit they ultimately pay for either but again, not that black and white.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 12:13 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Plane trees are really the best urban trees if you can make them work. Big leaves provide lots of shade and dappled sunlight, the white mottled bark is beautiful. They tend to grow straight and at a consistent rate, and the roots don't mess up the pavements. They've been a staple of European landscape design for basically centuries.

The regular varieties of plane tree don't really work in Chicago unfortunately, the hard frosts can damage the bark and they don't like clay soils but there are some new varieties out there that are supposed to be better.

It's weird, for Northern California I always think of eucalyptus and not plane trees. I know Californians hate eucalyptus, but they're really quite beautiful and distinctive in the urban landscape.
San Francisco doesn't really need or want shade (call it "dappled sunlight" if you prefer). It's cold and windy and often foggy all summer. Today the high was 60 degrees and it's May. People crave the sun. That's why many public parks have few or no trees. But, again, the plane trees planted along major streets just don't thrive. That's obvious. What's not obvious is why the city still thinks they are suitable.

Californians hate eucalyptus because they drop gummy substances on the cars parked under them and because they are an invasive foreign species. So it's partly practical and partly obsessive environmentalism. But the problem is that coastal California has no suitable native species. The truly native trees tend to be stunted, gnarly species that look cool as isolated specimens but not lining streets.
__________________
Rusiya delenda est
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 12:35 AM
jboy560's Avatar
jboy560 jboy560 is offline
Cap ou pas cap?
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago, baby!
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven View Post
We almost had our city torn apart by freeways in the 1960s:



I suppose the "downtown loop" would have been created by I-35 on the east, the Riverside/First Street expwy on the south, Mopac on the west and the "Crosstown" expwy to the north (roughly 15th street).

Most of today's expressways border the whole of the urban core, with the exception of I-35 which runs right beside downtown and through the east side which many would consider part of the urban core. Hopefully dreams and visions to bury I-35 through downtown eventually materialize.
What city is this you’re referring to?
__________________
myspace.com/jboy560
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 1:16 AM
craigs's Avatar
craigs craigs is offline
Birds Aren't Real!
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,597
As Wikipedia notes, the Santa Monica Freeway (the 10 between downtown and the Pacific) is one of the busiest freeways in the world. It is the only east-west freeway serving the millions of people who live between downtown and Santa Monica, including the entire Westside, more than half of South Los Angeles, and numerous adjoining cities. Los Angeles would cease to function if the 10 were summarily ripped out and replaced with just another east-west boulevard like Wilshire, Santa Monica, Olympic, Pico, Venice, etc.

The regional public transit agency has invested and continues to invest significantly in alternatives to driving generally, and on the Westside specifically. A light rail line from downtown to Santa Monica opened in 2012, spurring construction of thousands of new homes and offices. And Metro is currently extending a heavy rail subway line that currently runs from downtown to Koreatown westward through Beverly Hills, Century City, and Westwood into Brentwood. There are many other regional bus and rail projects planned or under construction that are due to open before 2028, and one of those is a light rail line, south of the 10, that is set to open this year. This is all necessary and good--there is no doubt that we need more and better public transit.

However, freeway removal only makes sense on lightly-used, redundant routes--and the Santa Monica Freeway is neither. Arguing for its removal in a metropolitan area with over six million cars in the year 2022 is either willful ignorance or just tilting at windmills.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 4:07 AM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
them bones
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara adjacent
Posts: 7,387
It is curious to think which freeways in LA could be removed with seemingly a positive net impact. Top of mind would be the 90 (Marina del Rey) and maybe the 2 (Glendale Freeway). I'm not a huge fan of the 105 either, but since they built the Green Line as part of it...
__________________
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 8,000 people just like you...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 4:52 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
He/his/him. >~<, QED!
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 5,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by jboy560 View Post
What city is this you’re referring to?
That's Austin
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 1:55 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigs View Post
As Wikipedia notes, the Santa Monica Freeway (the 10 between downtown and the Pacific) is one of the busiest freeways in the world. It is the only east-west freeway serving the millions of people who live between downtown and Santa Monica, including the entire Westside, more than half of South Los Angeles, and numerous adjoining cities. Los Angeles would cease to function if the 10 were summarily ripped out and replaced with just another east-west boulevard like Wilshire, Santa Monica, Olympic, Pico, Venice, etc.

The regional public transit agency has invested and continues to invest significantly in alternatives to driving generally, and on the Westside specifically. A light rail line from downtown to Santa Monica opened in 2012, spurring construction of thousands of new homes and offices. And Metro is currently extending a heavy rail subway line that currently runs from downtown to Koreatown westward through Beverly Hills, Century City, and Westwood into Brentwood. There are many other regional bus and rail projects planned or under construction that are due to open before 2028, and one of those is a light rail line, south of the 10, that is set to open this year. This is all necessary and good--there is no doubt that we need more and better public transit.

However, freeway removal only makes sense on lightly-used, redundant routes--and the Santa Monica Freeway is neither. Arguing for its removal in a metropolitan area with over six million cars in the year 2022 is either willful ignorance or just tilting at windmills.
What do you think would happen if it suddenly disappeared?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 2:02 PM
badrunner badrunner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 2,696
Most people in the world will never experience the luxury of complete door-to-door personal mobility in comfort and safety. Unimpeded freedom of movement is one of the fundamental freedoms that Americans get to enjoy that we take for granted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 2:27 PM
Yuri's Avatar
Yuri Yuri is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,448
Quote:
Originally Posted by plinko View Post
It is curious to think which freeways in LA could be removed with seemingly a positive net impact. Top of mind would be the 90 (Marina del Rey) and maybe the 2 (Glendale Freeway). I'm not a huge fan of the 105 either, but since they built the Green Line as part of it...
That's a good question. Because I opened this thread to instigate discussion about possible removals, but people are fiercely opposing to remove any single inch of their freeways.

So it would be nice if SSPers could say which section of freeways they'd like to see removed. Or if they like all their freeways and would like to see more additions.
__________________
London - São Paulo - Rio de Janeiro - Londrina - Frankfurt
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 2:46 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,639
Imagine Toronto without the 401.

Torstar

The 401 is not only the primary commuting highway, it is the primary East-West throughway connecting half of Canada's population and more than half of its economy. the portion through Toronto has regularly been ranked as the world's busiest freeway in terms of traffic volume.

The entire city would have developed in a completely different fashion. It would be very interesting to contemplate a huge streetcar suburb Greater Toronto Area (pop 7+ million)

it never looks like this (evacation due to gas leak, 2008):
__________________
"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."-President Lyndon B. Johnson Donald Trump is a poor man's idea of a rich man, a weak man's idea of a strong man, and a stupid man's idea of a smart man. Am I an Asseau?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 2:51 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,742
Was the 401 inside Toronto when the freeway was built?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 2:56 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Was the 401 inside Toronto when the freeway was built?
It was North of the developed section of the city. But it was in the agglomeration formerly known as Metro Toronto (which contained six separate boroughs, much like how New York city has Brooklyn, Manhattan, etc., except that these boroughs had more independence and separate mayors).


wikipedia

Quote:
Within years after opening (1956), the four-lane Toronto Bypass was congested, prompting the Department of Highways to widen this section to 12 lanes beginning in 1963.

Upon its opening, the bypass was described by one reporter as "a motorist's dream" providing "some of the most soothing scenery in the Metropolitan area". The reporter continued, with regard to the eastern section through Scarborough, that it "winds smoothly through pastures across streams and rivers, and beside green thickets. It seems a long way from the big city."By 1959 however, the bypass was a lineup of cars, as 85,000 drivers crowded the roadway, designed to handle a maximum of 48,000 vehicles, on a daily basis. Motorists found the new road to be a convenient way of travelling across Toronto; this convenience helped influence the suburban shift in the city and continues to be a driving force of urban sprawl today.
wikipedia
__________________
"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."-President Lyndon B. Johnson Donald Trump is a poor man's idea of a rich man, a weak man's idea of a strong man, and a stupid man's idea of a smart man. Am I an Asseau?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 2:59 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
It was North of the developed section of the city. But it was in the agglomeration formerly known as Metro Toronto (which contained six separate boroughs, much like how New York city has Brooklyn, Manhattan, etc.).

Right... It was built through farmland. It's not really an "urban freeway".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 3:08 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,639
I suppose not.
__________________
"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."-President Lyndon B. Johnson Donald Trump is a poor man's idea of a rich man, a weak man's idea of a strong man, and a stupid man's idea of a smart man. Am I an Asseau?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.