HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #281  
Old Posted May 6, 2022, 12:40 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
Been a while since a Jersey City update.

Latest list as per SSP member "C". SSP thread links imbedded.

= = = = =


Under Construction
Journal Squared Tower III | residential | 61 floors | under construction
30 Park Lane North | residential | 33 floors | under construction
Provost Square III | mixed-use | 33 floors | under construction
26-28 Van Reipen Avenue | residential | 27 floors | under construction
33-35 Van Reipen Avenue | residential | 27 floors | under construction
415-435 Summit Avenue (425 Summit) | mixed-use | 27 floors | under construction
571-577 Pavonia Ave (Journal Square Urby) | residential | 25 floors | excavation
262 Johnson Avenue | mixed-use | 25 floors | under construction
407-413 Summit Ave | residential | 19 floors | under construction
711 Montgomery St | residential | 16 floors | excavation
32 Oakland | residential | 14 floors | under construction
161 Van Wagenen Ave | residential | 13 floors | under construction
345 Baldwin | residential | 13 floors | under construction
358 Martin Luther King Drive (Jersey City Public Safety Building) | government | 12 floors | under construction
144 First St | residential | 12 floors | under construction
One Grove | residential | 12 floors | under construction


Approved
444 Washington Boulevard | residential | 70 floors | approved
560 Marin Blvd | residential | 59 floors | approved
580 Marin Blvd | residential | 57 floors | approved
808 Pavonia I | residential | 57 floors | approved
499-501 Summit Avenue | residential | 53 floors | approved
808 Pavonia II | residential | 51 floors | approved
150 River Drive Tower A | residential | 48 floors | approved
500 Summit Ave | mixed use | 42 floors | approved
Pier Six IV | residential | 39 floors | approved
150 River Drive Tower B | residential | 38 floors | approved
Pier Six I | residential | 33 floors | approved
Pier Six II | residential | 33 floors | approved
Pier Six III | residential | 33 floors | approved
32-38 Cottage St. | residential | 32 floors | approved
2958 Kennedy Blvd | residential | 31 floors | approved
414 Hoboken Avenue (Bergen Arch Plaza I) | residential | 28 floors | approved
414 Hoboken Avenue (Bergen Arch Plaza II) | residential | 28 floors | approved
11-29 Cottage Street | residential | 28 floors | approved
21-29 Van Reipen Avenue | residential | 27 floors | approved
618 Pavonia | residential | 27 floors | approved
622 Summit | residential | 27 floors | approved
630-632 Newark Ave | mixed use | 27 floors | approved
262 Johnson | residential | 24 floors | approved
619 Marin Blvd | residential | 24 floors | approved
St Lucy's Redevelopment | residential | 23 floors | approved
286 Coles St | residential | 21 floors | approved
2973 JFK Blvd | residential | 20 floors | approved | article
417 Communipaw Avenue | residential | 20 floors | approved
165-173 Academy St | mixed | 19 floors | approved
198 Academy | residential | 18 floors | approved
682 Route 440 aka 11 Bennett St | residential | 15 floors | approved | article
150 River Drive Tower C | residential | 14 floors | approved
232-238 Sip Ave | mixed | 14 floors | approved
1075 West Side Ave I | residential | 13 floors | approved
1075 West Side Ave II | residential | 13 floors | approved
44-48 Newkirk Ave | residential | 12 floors | approved
96-110 Tonnele Ave | residential |12 floors | approved
2 Hoboken Ave | residential | 13 floors | approved
305 Coles St I | residential | 12 floors | approved
305 Coles St II | residential | 12 floors | approved
100 Colden Street | residential | 12 floors | approved
20 Carbon Place I | residential | 12 floors | approved
20 Carbon Place II | residential | 12 floors | approved
3085 JFK Blvd I | residential | 12 floors | approved
3085 JFK Blvd II | residential | 12 floors | approved
Bayfront Development | mixed-use | multiple | approved


Proposed
242 Hudson Street (Harbourside XIII) | residential | 68 floors | proposed
107 Morgan | residential | 60+ floors | proposed
Water/Culver Parcel I | residential | 55 floors | proposed
Water/Culver Parcel II | mixed-use | 55 floors | proposed
Water/Culver Parcel III | mixed-use | 38 floors | proposed
Harborside Plaza IV | office | 38 floors | proposed
Water/Culver Parcel IV | mixed-use | 30 floors | proposed
35-43 Cottage | residential | 27 floors | proposed
Holland Park I | residential | 18 floors | proposed
Holland Park II | residential | 18 floors | proposed
597 Marin Boulevard aka 166 14th Street | residential | 14 floors | proposed
44-48 Newkirk St | residential | 13 floors | proposed
The Cove | sciences, residential mixed-use | ?? floors | proposed

Stalled/Stale
30 Journal Square Plaza | residential | 72 floors | stalled
Urban Ready Living II | residential | 69 floors | stalled
Urban Ready Living III | residential | 65 floors | stalled
One Journal Square I | residential | 56 floors | stalled
One Journal Square II | residential | 56 floors | stalled
101 Newkirk St. | residential | 50 floors | stalled
180 Baldwin Ave | mixed-use | 25 floors | stalled
177 Grand Street I | residential | 22 floors | stalled
177 Grand Street II | residential | 16 floors | stalled
448-466 Grand St | residential | 13 floors | stalled
15 Nardone Place I | residential | 13 floors | stalled
15 Nardone Place II | residential | 11 floors | stalled
Journal Square PATH Station Redevelopment | mixed-use | ?? floors | stalled

What's New
262 Johnson | residential | 24 floors | approved
597 Marin Boulevard aka 166 14th Street | residential | 14 floors | proposed
44-48 Newkirk St | residential | 13 floors | proposed
Lots of upgrades from proposed to approved
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #282  
Old Posted May 30, 2022, 1:09 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
So some good news this last quarter (one) for NYC. Highest volume of new filings since 2014.

= = = = = = =




Q1 2022 New Building Construction Pipeline Report (NYC):


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #283  
Old Posted May 31, 2022, 3:44 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is online now
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
So some good news this last quarter (one) for NYC. Highest volume of new filings since 2014.

= = = = = = =




Q1 2022 New Building Construction Pipeline Report (NYC):



yep, new Q1 units are basically double last year -- so back to normal around here -- sorta --

https://newyorkyimby.com/2022/05/yim...york-city.html

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #284  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2022, 12:55 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
Just some Data: 6/25/2022

121,893 proposed units for NYC as of June 25th 2022.
180.2 million square feet in total.




Distribution of Pipeline Units:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #285  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2022, 1:09 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
^^^^^

Just a follow up. Borough specific versus city wide in the post above.

Manhattan: 35,220 units.



Brooklyn: 37,777 units.



Queens: 28,688 units



Bronx: 18,483 units



Staten Island: 1,725 units

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #286  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2022, 9:05 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
Official Renderings are out for a new American icon: 270 Park!
It’s very NYC… very boxy. I get that this is a prime location in Manhattan and that you need to maximize the amount of floor space, but this is bulky and not at all elegant. This will only be worthy of “icon status” by virtue of height and prominence, not because of design. IMO.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #287  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2022, 9:12 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
It’s very NYC… very boxy. I get that this is a prime location in Manhattan and that you need to maximize the amount of floor space, but this is bulky and not at all elegant. This will only be worthy of “icon status” by virtue of height and prominence, not because of design. IMO.
Nonsense. This building is amazing. The material choice, the lighting, the landscaping, the overall design it's all great.

The reason it might not be an icon (it probably will, you can never predict these things) is that just a few years after completing it will be overshadowed by 175 Park, another amazing design.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #288  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2022, 9:18 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC123 View Post
Nonsense. This building is amazing. The material choice, the lighting, the landscaping, the overall design it's all great.

The reason it might not be an icon (it probably will, you can never predict these things) is that just a few years after completing it will be overshadowed by 175 Park, another amazing design.
That’s right, you never know.

175 Park is what I would call an elegant design. The amount of supertalls being constructed in east Midtown means that all these buildings will be competing for attention. Then again, the Chrysler won’t be any less of an icon even though it’s already dwarfed by One Vanderbilt.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #289  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2022, 9:23 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanderer34 View Post
LA is just a different city through and through and no matter how many skyscrapers LA builds, it's a car centric city through and through and with spread out CBDs such as Culver City, Hollywood, Universal City, and Beverly Hils as well as DT LA, it will always be difficult to have a contiguous skyline the way NYC, Chicago, and Miami has. Plus SF has just about the same number of skyscrapers as LA so as far as a corporate capital, LA will always play second fiddle to SF in the number of corporations it has.
Eh. Companies can always move to new spaces and office buildings converted to housing.

There also isn’t a strict correlation between corporate prowess and skyline size. The Bay Area’s biggest corporate players are based in sprawling office parks in Silicon Valley, while Miami’s skyline is largely residential.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #290  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2022, 10:57 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
It’s very NYC… very boxy. I get that this is a prime location in Manhattan and that you need to maximize the amount of floor space, but this is bulky and not at all elegant. This will only be worthy of “icon status” by virtue of height and prominence, not because of design. IMO.
I suppose its a matter of taste but I think many feel the design is excellent. It's a very environmentally efficient design as well (zero emissions is the goal) along with everything your modern tenants want. In this case, HQ for JP Morgan but has the features that if not this tower, another tower if they weren't building it for themselves but seeking a lease.

I guess we will wait and see. Many have said the same thing about One Vanderbilt and once it was up and running, had a change of heart. I even recall others saying the same thing about 432 Park and than grew fond of it.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #291  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2022, 2:17 AM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
them bones
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara adjacent
Posts: 7,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by hughfb3 View Post
Both Los Angeles and San Francisco practice skyline sculpting where in Los Angeles, our planning commission shapes the skyline to mimic the San Gabriel Mountains, the Hollywood Hills, and other natural formations that are viewed from specific vantage points.
I’ve heard you say this before…source?
__________________
Even if you are 1 in a million, there are still 8,000 people just like you...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #292  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2022, 3:25 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,009
After what happened with Tribune East in Chicago I really hope 175 Park goes through... such a gem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #293  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2022, 3:53 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by plinko View Post
I’ve heard you say this before…source?
I agree. I've never seen such things in planning documents, approvals, council meetings, etc
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #294  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2022, 4:07 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
After what happened with Tribune East in Chicago I really hope 175 Park goes through... such a gem.
175 will be fine. It's in a much better position than Tribune East was.
It's not the second phase, or side project of anything. It's the main deal.
It's already approved.
As One Vanderbilt has shown, being on top of (or nearby to) good transit matters, a lot. And 175 Park is on that same high quality transit.

And a variety of other reasons.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #295  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2022, 9:46 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
I suppose its a matter of taste but I think many feel the design is excellent. It's a very environmentally efficient design as well (zero emissions is the goal) along with everything your modern tenants want. In this case, HQ for JP Morgan but has the features that if not this tower, another tower if they weren't building it for themselves but seeking a lease.
Is it a nice design? Of course. Will it be prominent/change the skyline? Yes. Do I think it's elegant? Not really. I find it typical of what you would expect of an American city, especially New York — big, bold, boxy. That this will be JPMC's headquarters is fitting. "Bigger is better."

I'm waiting for something like 20 Fenchurch.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #296  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2022, 8:22 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,605
now that the CTBUH has listed both 99 red river in austin and 262 5th in NYC as officially under construction, i've updated the 800 footer chart below, along with all of the data back in the 1st post of this thread.

including the two new ones, there are now 92 800+ footers completed or U/C in the US. we're quickly closing in on 100!


__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #297  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2022, 8:39 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,524
^ Cool
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #298  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2022, 10:14 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
That's a great list Steely.

Miami is going to jump up in that rankings soon and in a big way.

Baccarat Residences is slated for the Fall u/c and has two out of three components at 897 + 848 ft. All rising at the same time. Okan Tower is starting up soon at 902 ft with equipment present and crane up. Waldorf is starting up soon (super tall). 1420 S Miami Avenue has one component at 940 ft. Construction permit pending. 888 Brickell Avenue has a very strong chance of rising, at 1,049 ft. Likewise with the Hyatt Regency redevelopment, one portion being a super tall. To lazy to dig up the others.

Point is, Miami the way things are going will be a solid #3. Will happen soon in terms of 800 ft+.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #299  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2022, 2:41 AM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,062
I don't completely trust CTBUH numbere (their supertall numbers for NYC are wrong, it's not 15 it's 19) but the numbers are good enough.

Yeah Miami is about to blow up. Surpassing Philly I think? Idk.

NYC is about to go even crazier over the next couple of years. Penn Station area, HY towers phase 1 are basically finished next is HY phase 2. PABT redevelopment. Midtown East continues to grow. Etc etc.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #300  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2022, 3:15 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,605
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC123 View Post
I don't completely trust CTBUH numbere (their supertall numbers for NYC are wrong, it's not 15 it's 19) but the numbers are good enough.
If you know of any US 800+ footers not accounted for in the chart I made, please let me know.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.