HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1221  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2024, 2:12 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 574
from yesterday:

South Loop would get more than a new White Sox stadium — think residences, a hotel, restaurants and more

https://chicago.suntimes.com/white-s...ar-development
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1222  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2024, 2:56 PM
Ahoi's Avatar
Ahoi Ahoi is offline
Mulan M.
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 240
After the casino project was canceled here, a stadium is now being proposed. I think that a stadium is more likely to be built here than a casino.

My suggestion would be different with lots of public open spaces, parks, a complete riverside promenade and a few small fountains. In the center, a small European-style building with a park (interrupted by the street) down to the river. In the background are a few skyscrapers in the historic still that would be over 700 feet tall.

And this would be the small building that could also function as a tourist attraction, the old Xie Qiqu and this is the original floor plan.





__________________
Xiyang Lou (Versailles of the east)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1223  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2024, 6:17 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
Ald. Dowell has given her blessing for the plan. The question now is, how will this be financed? The 78 already secured $700 million in TIF so I doubt the city will want to give them additional money, and Pritzker doesn't seem keen on having the state fund the stadium.

South Loop alderman throws support behind new White Sox stadium after developer meeting
https://www.chicagotribune.com/polit...qpm-story.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1224  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2024, 6:40 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 977
It would be nice if the LaSalle Street Metra station could open an entrance off Polk Street – it would be just a couple blocks away from the stadium.

I also think Financial Place or LaSalle between Polk and Harrison could make for interesting pedestrian-only streets. Financial Pl. is mostly a long surface parking lot that could be turned into a cool commercial development to serve the thousands of fans six months a year who might be waiting for a Metra back out of the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1225  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2024, 6:52 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
Looks like stadiums are as-of-right in the PD, so they won't need City Council's approval for another zoning change:
Quote:
There’s another perk to building a stadium at The 78: the Planned Development, a zoning package that guides the scope of development within the area, was approved by the City Council in 2019 for Related Midwest and already allows a stadium by right. So if the Sox were to make the move from their current home at Guaranteed Rate Field, the team would not need to clear those zoning hurdles.
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/poli...e-neighborhood
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1226  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2024, 3:49 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,442
Wow. Are the Dearborn Park neighbors melting down yet? I assume they've started some petitions, FB groups, etc?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1227  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2024, 11:05 PM
ducttape ducttape is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 3
skyline stadium



View from inside stadium?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1228  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 1:02 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Looks like stadiums are as-of-right in the PD, so they won't need City Council's approval for another zoning change:

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/poli...e-neighborhood
That's insane. This is why you hire a good zoning lawyer, folks...


Quote:
Originally Posted by ithakas View Post
It would be nice if the LaSalle Street Metra station could open an entrance off Polk Street – it would be just a couple blocks away from the stadium.

I also think Financial Place or LaSalle between Polk and Harrison could make for interesting pedestrian-only streets. Financial Pl. is mostly a long surface parking lot that could be turned into a cool commercial development to serve the thousands of fans six months a year who might be waiting for a Metra back out of the city.
They should just open a new Metra stop at 15th right next to the stadium. As I mentioned upthread, this is probably a better use of money than a Red Line stop if The 78 is gonna be a stadium village instead of an office district. It looks like the 5000 new apartments will be pushed north where they will have an easy walk to the Roosevelt stop, and a lot of baseball fans will come in from the burbs. New subway station: $500M at least, new Metra stop: $30M.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1229  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 7:06 AM
Bonsai Tree's Avatar
Bonsai Tree Bonsai Tree is offline
Small but Mighty
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 343
Why not have both? Lasalle St currently only serves the RI Line- which has a pretty big Southside catchment area, but it's not the only line that Sox fans will come in on.

Also- look at the rendering again. The current plan seems to have the stadium in the middle of the site. Not sure where you got the idea that the residential will be pushed to the north either-seems to me like it's evenly spread out N/S from the rendering. Also a stop at 15th street would be considerably closer than Roosevelt for fans at the stadium, people working at the new DPI and the residential / office towers around it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1230  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 1:53 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai Tree View Post
Why not have both? Lasalle St currently only serves the RI Line- which has a pretty big Southside catchment area, but it's not the only line that Sox fans will come in on.
I think the reason was pretty clear, money. Personally, I think whether or not a CTA stop is built, they should consider including a stop for the ME trains since the ultimate plan is to use the St Charles Airline bridge to connect McCormick and Union Station.

If you were to do that, you’d have a huge catchment area from the suburbs and the city. It would increase capacity a lot. Though they would probably need to reconfigure the tracks so the ME connector is elevated, which could raise the price significantly.

In all honestly, they have the opportunity to do all three here, which is a unique opportunity. They wouldn’t be fudging it like One Central. Plus it would really give a boost to this development that is much realistic currently than any plan One Central comes up with and in the long run once the 78 is built out and thriving it makes One Central more likely to be built IMO.

So if they’re going to go all out, they need to at least explore the idea of incorporating a ME station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1231  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2024, 9:31 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonsai Tree View Post
Why not have both? Lasalle St currently only serves the RI Line- which has a pretty big Southside catchment area, but it's not the only line that Sox fans will come in on.

Also- look at the rendering again. The current plan seems to have the stadium in the middle of the site. Not sure where you got the idea that the residential will be pushed to the north either-seems to me like it's evenly spread out N/S from the rendering. Also a stop at 15th street would be considerably closer than Roosevelt for fans at the stadium, people working at the new DPI and the residential / office towers around it
By the time the stadium opens, the SouthWest Service will be re-routed to LaSalle in addition to the Rock Island (work is ongoing at 75th St to build the new connection). So that's two train lines, serving a big piece of the south side and south burbs.

The problem with the Red Line is that Sox fans can already use it at 35th, but they mostly don't. Realistically, the Red Line serves mostly South Side neighborhoods where people don't have disposable income to go to baseball games. That won't change when the Red Line is extended to 130th, either.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1232  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2024, 9:51 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
Those red line trains are packed after games. Well, if the Sox are doing well that is. It is all relative.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1233  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2024, 10:03 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by ducttape View Post


View from inside stadium?
Dear God, Allah, Buddha, the ghost of Studs Terkel, let this be built.
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1234  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 9:29 PM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 395
If the Sox Stadium will be built in the 78, maybe we can get that observation tower revised and built! lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1235  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2024, 10:33 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
MLB’s Commissioner Rob Manfred was interview by Crain's and said the new stadium will not be finaced by new taxes. This matches with what sources told Crain's a few days, where the Sox will instead ask an extension of their existing bonds from ISFA to cover the costs of the new stadium.
Quote:
The head of Major League Baseball says he’s all in for a White Sox proposal to build a new stadium on The 78 property on the southwest edge of the Loop — and he believes it can be financed with “no new taxes.
....
Manfred said he’s not familiar with all the details of the proposed new facility, such as what sort of architectural era it might evoke, but said Reinsdorf has assured him it would require “no new taxes.”
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/spor...te-sox-stadium

Quote:
Sources familiar with what the team is planning, but who say they are not free to speak about the deal, have told Crain’s that the White Sox are likely to ask state legislators to empower the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority to either extend or issue new bonds backed by the existing 2% hotel occupancy tax currently used to satisfy the bonds issued to pay for Guaranteed Rate Field.

While that would not raise a new tax, because the hotel occupancy tax is already in place, state legislators may still turn up their noses at extending or issuing new bonds, or providing any public dollars to help build a stadium for a team whose value is measured in billions.
https://www.chicagobusiness.com/poli...ed-sox-stadium
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1236  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2024, 11:06 PM
BearTackle BearTackle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
Those red line trains are packed after games. Well, if the Sox are doing well that is. It is all relative.
What I like is that the new stadium is close to all the trains in the Loop, so I will just be taking the Brown Line there, which will ease the packed Red Line trains.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1237  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2024, 5:28 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is online now
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,361
Gotta love the marketing PR by MLB and the White Sox.

"No new taxes!! We are so magnanimous we will just ask to continue a tax that shouldn't have even been implemented in the first place!...."

I hope that city and state will renegotiate better terms this time around. Very generally, I don't think that public funding has been as lucrative for most stadium deals in the last decade as it was. JR needs to put more skin in the game. Or else he can take the team to Charlotte or Portland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1238  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2024, 11:02 PM
jpIllInoIs's Avatar
jpIllInoIs jpIllInoIs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
Gotta love the marketing PR by MLB and the White Sox.

"No new taxes!! We are so magnanimous we will just ask to continue a tax that shouldn't have even been implemented in the first place!...."

I hope that city and state will renegotiate better terms this time around. Very generally, I don't think that public funding has been as lucrative for most stadium deals in the last decade as it was. JR needs to put more skin in the game. Or else he can take the team to Charlotte or Portland.
Yep No New Taxes is not the same as No New Bonds, financed by the tax payers. Look for McPier Authority to weigh in soon.

\ EDIT No new taxes...for Reinsdorf. Look for the land and property abatements beaucoup wazoo!



But I like the project anyway.. I hope to see dimensional renderings of a stadium built for an urban space that has picular angles and sightlines only available to this locale.
Also talk about the missing link for entertainment , cultural institutions. Walking dist to McMck, wintrust, MotorRow, Chinatown and South Loop!!!

Last edited by jpIllInoIs; Jan 30, 2024 at 11:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1239  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2024, 2:06 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 969
Do they not want to own the new stadium like the Ricketts own Wrigley?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1240  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2024, 4:53 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is online now
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by west-town-brad View Post
Do they not want to own the new stadium like the Ricketts own Wrigley?
I think JR feels that he can get more public financing if the city/state technically own the stadium. The amount the Sox paid annually on the lease the last 30 years has been a pittance as far as I understand it. Even just the land acquisition would probably cost more than the cumulative lease at the 78 if the current lease terms are anything to go by.

JR gets to up the value of the club with a new park he gets to be a tenant at with the city/state paying all the upfront expenses, taxes, and park upgrades down the road. He gets to invest earnings in more tangible growth assets instead of maintaining a single-use facility. He will likely try to rob the city/state again on any parking and concession proceeds as well.

Last edited by nomarandlee; Jan 31, 2024 at 6:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:39 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.