HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 1:45 AM
Tornado Tornado is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by myBrain View Post
If this + 98 RR get built I think we jump up to being one of the most distinct, futuristic skylines in the United States. I can't think of another city in the US whose skyline would be as characterized by this many 21st century towers.

Both this and 98 RR will have that floating top segment effect too.
I don't know of anywhere else in the United States where this level of high-rise construction is going on...maybe Seattle?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 1:49 AM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,364
New York, obviously. Miami to some extent.
__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 2:12 AM
davidberko davidberko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echostatic View Post
New York, obviously. Miami to some extent.
Chicago too. They're always building tall there. Home of the skyscraper after all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 4:53 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,735
Now just picture the 1,022 footer right behind and you have a trio of monsters. One things for sure, our tallest won't look out of place on the skyline. Just need a couple of 900 footers to really have that height variation.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 5:01 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,042
Just because we are on a new page in this thread...


__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 5:20 AM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
Just need a couple of 900 footers to really have that height variation.
I think you'll get that height variation with the 400' "plateau" buildings, coupled with the 500/600-footers, plus a few 700-footers, and then a sprinkle of 800'ers. It would be cool to have a 900-footer or two...but, not necessary to create a steady variation between heights.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 5:22 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,042
I like how we are developing a skyline with several peaks - like Chicago IMO.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 6:54 AM
Maximusx1's Avatar
Maximusx1 Maximusx1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 257
Incredibly exciting and love seeing something go from almost dead to 800+ feet.

But holy hell, Rainey is going to be a construction nightmare for years.

River Street Residences
84 East
90 Rainey
Travis I
Travis II
98 Red River Supertall
99 Red River WeWork
MACC Update
Blue Line Train Station/Bridge
Cut and Cap I-35 at the River

Bring it on baby
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 12:22 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echostatic View Post
Oh, a rooftop restaurant would be incredible.
I suspect the rooftop restaurant will be on the garage roof (outside the hotel) and not on the condo roof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 2:05 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
I have to say, the two towers are a pretty strange pair. #1 and #2 don't really mesh at all in terms of style -- even thought they seemingly share the same parking podium. Not trying to look a gift horse in the mouth, but I'm v. curious to understand how tower #2 came to be, and what M2 has to do with the original developer. Also how they get built -- at the same time or in phases? More details please.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 11:25 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,595
Celebrated Architects Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Headed for the Rainey District

https://austin.towers.net/another-to...ady-bird-lake/

A 64-story mixed-use tower project designed by world-famous architecture firm Skidmore, Owings & Merrill will bring condos, apartments, and a 250-room hotel to the shores of Lady Bird Lake by the end of 2025, according
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 11:50 PM
oberthewhat oberthewhat is offline
lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 95
why the heck does this look so similar to the waller creek tower? they seem to have the same design minus the angle?
__________________
Obbshnopper

The future will be here, tomorrow
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2021, 11:58 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
I suspect the rooftop restaurant will be on the garage roof (outside the hotel) and not on the condo roof.
Same Architect, same developer as a similar project in Nashville. It will be rooftop (800'+ in the air).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2021, 5:46 PM
H2O H2O is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,597
That's nuts! Basically the same project / program on a larger site, and therefor shorter. Even the press releases are nearly identical except for the location and statistics. It makes me wonder if the person writing / editing both of them simultaneously didn't mess up the numbers somewhere in the copy / paste process. I didn't see any reference to the restaurant being on the top roof on either project, but I will take your word for it. It would be cool!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2021, 10:12 PM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 360, St. Edwards
Posts: 12,377
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.sta...amp/4261370001

Quote:
M2 is targeting an April 2022 groundbreaking for the project, and said a name for the tower will be announced in the coming weeks. The project's anticipated opening date is the third quarter of 2025.
__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2021, 10:17 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,042
From the Statesman's article...

__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2021, 8:27 AM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,094
I like the 802’ feet height but I don’t like the design for this thing. It’s too simplistic but they did mention that more details and updates are sure to come. So here’s to hoping they keep the height and change the design a bit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2021, 2:11 PM
lonewolf lonewolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 546
i don't have an opinion yet since it looks like there are miles to go before we see something close to a final draft
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2021, 3:06 PM
Geckos_Rule's Avatar
Geckos_Rule Geckos_Rule is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Austin
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by N90 View Post
I like the 802’ feet height but I don’t like the design for this thing. It’s too simplistic but they did mention that more details and updates are sure to come. So here’s to hoping they keep the height and change the design a bit.
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill are the architects behind the Willis (Sears) Tower, and the John Hancock Building in Chicago, so hopefully we see a bit of that here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2021, 3:28 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonewolf View Post
i don't have an opinion yet since it looks like there are miles to go before we see something close to a final draft
I have started to think the same thing. Not financed yet, and -- while I'm sure pretty much anything that resembles this will find a loan eventually -- I'm not convinced this is the final product. Maybe I'm just hesitant, not knowing how the two developers are going to work on the same lot. Dunno. This feels not all the way cooked yet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:38 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.