HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 6:06 AM
i_am_kyry i_am_kyry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Buena Park, Chicago, USA
Posts: 17
The Washington Park site is far superior to the Jackson Park site, IMO. Jackson has far less 'passive' park space and the immediate surroundings don't offer the adjacent vacant land to build the auxiliary amenities to the library, plus the Green stopping pretty much on site. Such as, the library itself, will be on the actual park space, and the rest will fill that land west of MLK. Plus, I dig that the library will pair nicely with the DuSable across the park to make a foundational African American History Campus. A nice first gesture by the foundation would be the build a new Dyatt HS a few blocks west on 51st and return the current land back to original park space.

But, ya know, wishful thinking...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 7:11 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
It's not about whether the library is good or bad.

The ends don't always justify the means, and this library has had some pretty messed-up means thus far.

Will you be so supportive if Obama decides to hire RAMSA to design his library? (They already did the Bush one, after all.) That's the problem - by sacrificing the civic debate over the location on public parkland, we're signalling to the Obama Foundation that they have carte blanche and they don't need to listen to the public. They don't need to pay attention to decent urban planning principles, because they're more important than the park's thousands of daily users. They don't need to pay attention to architectural critics, because they're more important than Olmsted or the city's architectural legacy.

Will you be so supportive if the library is built in Jackson Park, but the requirement to supply replacement parkland is ignored and forgotten? That stuff happens all the time.
It hasn't gotten that far yet. Let's have the official announcement before we get onto design. I think you know by know where my standards are when it comes to design and seeing as this time it's actually my neighborhood, I'll have no problem being more vocal than usual. There was no debate over the parkland. It was either going there or Chicago wasn't going to get the chance to land the project. Case closed... I was quite vocal on that issue at both public meetings, but I'd rather have the library than not. I understand your passion as it's my passion too, but as I said, I'd rather have this than not.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 12:55 PM
Justin_Chicago Justin_Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 377
I hope people do not expect much. I am thinking 100-200 support staff jobs. The library should attract a good amount of visitors annually, which means a few independent businesses (lunch spots, cafes, etc.) can open within close proximity. Then maybe people will consider moving to the neighborhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 1:51 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,635
* off topic posts deleted *

i just want to drop a note to remind everyone that this thread is about the presidential library itself. everyone in the entire universe is aware of the fact that president obama is a very polarizing figure. this isn't the thread to get into his politics and presidency and legacy and all of that because we all know that will go nowhere fast.

if you love obama, that's super.

if you hate obama, that's just dandy too.

but now that chicago has been chosen as the host city, we will keep discussion in this thread focused on the library itself and issues surrounding its location, siting, design, construction, community impact, etc.

if you want to discuss obama as president, there are roughly 10 billion other websites on the internet that will be more than happy to indulge your political rantings and ravings.

carry on.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; May 1, 2015 at 2:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 1:55 PM
vandelay vandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 871
I hope that the Obama library committee picks a neo-Gothic design to befit the connection to UChicago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 2:03 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 971
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Chicago gets the Obama Presidential Library. Will the area it gets put in see any economic benefits after awhile?
UChicago's already had some activity in the neighborhood – the Arts Incubator & the Currency Exchange Cafe, both of which are being overseen by Theaster Gates in some way (he has a leadership role with the university for their UChicago Arts initiative).

I'll be interested to see if the university does anything with the Schulze Baking Company building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 2:06 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_am_kyry View Post
The Washington Park site is far superior to the Jackson Park site, IMO. Jackson has far less 'passive' park space and the immediate surroundings don't offer the adjacent vacant land to build the auxiliary amenities to the library, plus the Green stopping pretty much on site. Such as, the library itself, will be on the actual park space, and the rest will fill that land west of MLK. Plus, I dig that the library will pair nicely with the DuSable across the park to make a foundational African American History Campus. A nice first gesture by the foundation would be the build a new Dyatt HS a few blocks west on 51st and return the current land back to original park space.

But, ya know, wishful thinking...
I hope it ends up in Washington Park too. Ultimately, I think the fact that the Green AND Red lines go to or near there will play a major role in this. These things are a lot easier for tourists to figure out than the Metra and Bus, but even besides that - it runs more frequent (and later) than Metra/Bus. Also more pick up points than the Metra for sure.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 2:37 PM
UPChicago's Avatar
UPChicago UPChicago is offline
Vote for me for Mayor!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 797
I think if U of C has anything to do with it the design will be modern. Hopefully they don't enlist Jeanne Gang, maybe we will get something like HOK's proposal!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 2:59 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 971
Anyone have thoughts on this?

http://www.fitzgeraldassociates.net/...ngton-park.htm

Speculative?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 3:10 PM
UPChicago's Avatar
UPChicago UPChicago is offline
Vote for me for Mayor!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 797
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithakas View Post
Anyone have thoughts on this?

http://www.fitzgeraldassociates.net/...ngton-park.htm

Speculative?
Not speculative this was a project that was planned before Obama was president, it was cancelled.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 3:31 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Yeah really. I don't see the "slippery slope" people keep whining about. It's not as if Presidents and billionaires propose massive museums on Chicago parkland more than once in a century.
What makes you think it'll stop with billionaires building libraries. Des Plaines just voted to hand park land over to a Mariano's for a driveway and parking lot. Precedent has been set, if parkland can be used for economic development it will be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 3:41 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,635
Quote:
Sun-Times exclusive: Gov. Rauner to sign Obama Library, Lucas Museum bill
Posted: 05/01/2015, 09:57am | Lynn Sweet


WASHINGTON — Gov. Bruce Rauner on Friday afternoon will sign the bill making it harder to legally challenge the construction of the Obama presidential library complex and the Lucas Museum.

“I am very excited about it. I look forward to signing it,” Rauner told the Sun-Times.

“I plan to sign it this afternoon as soon as I get back to Springfield,” he added. “The bill obviously makes it easier to get the Obama Library in Chicago. And I think the president’s library will be a very benefit to the state of Illinois and to the city of Chicago and I am very supportive of that.”

Likewise, he said, “I also think the Lucas museum will be a big benefit to the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago and I am supportive of that.”
source: http://chicago.suntimes.com/lynn-swe...imes-exclusive
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 3:45 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithakas View Post
I'll be interested to see if the university does anything with the Schulze Baking Company building.
Looks like it will become a data center.
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150...as-data-center
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 3:47 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Yeah really. I don't see the "slippery slope" people keep whining about. It's not as if Presidents and billionaires propose massive museums on Chicago parkland more than once in a century.
Exactly, oh no! Now every billionaire and president will want to dump hundreds of millions of dollars into Chicago!

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
What makes you think it'll stop with billionaires building libraries. Des Plaines just voted to hand park land over to a Mariano's for a driveway and parking lot. Precedent has been set, if parkland can be used for economic development it will be.
See, that's the problem with slippery slope arguments, they are invalid. Chicago is not Des Plaines, Chicago is not giving parkland to Marianos. Chicago has not given park land to anyone except non profit foundations supporting the legacy of two of the most influential people of the past 40 years. There is no precedent being set here for commercial interests to take park land nor will there be unless we start giving parkland to commercial interests which has. not. happened.

The only precedent being set here is that Chicago will, as it always has, bend over backwards to get things done when it just makes sense. Both of these projects are no-brainer wins for the city. So the only message we are sending is that if you are rich, powerful, and influential and want to give Chicago a big fucking gift, then we'll take it. I don't exactly see a problem with sending that message.

The precedent of giving parkland to museums was already set over the past 100+ years by AIC, Field Museum, Shedd, Adler, Mexican Museum of Fine Art, etc, etc, etc. My question to everyone complaining about "precedent" is: How is this anything new? We've literally been doing it since our earliest days as a city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 3:48 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Quote:
“I also think the Lucas museum will be a big benefit to the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago and I am supportive of that.”
This Rauner quote says it all: I am in support of getting huge handouts from anyone who is rich and influential and wants to improve Chicago and Illinois. Anyone who is against that is
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 4:06 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,543
^ You don't see the slipperiness though in this at all? Really??

Some billionaires may end up having a funny view of what constitutes improvement of Chicago and Illinois.......and if the mayor and/or governor, etc, share in that view of improvement, we could be setting the stage here for real problems down the road........Also, what about just a hundred millionaire.....or few dozen millionaire? That's still pretty wealthy, why can't they have a crack at some of this park action? They've got ideas for improvin' this town as well, you know.

And, you always trust that Chicago/Illinois' leadership will be so wise and all-knowing as to not give parkland to Mariano's (or substitute whatever MORE prestigious, upscale, all-powerful private interest)? That's some real faith, man.

And, did you just call George Lucas one of the most influential people over the last 40 years?? I mean, I liked the original trilogy as much as the next guy, and appreciate the advances in the art and entertainment/media form therein, but that's just silly, all things considered.......
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.

Last edited by SamInTheLoop; May 1, 2015 at 6:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 5:09 PM
ChickeNES's Avatar
ChickeNES ChickeNES is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Looks like it will become a data center.
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150...as-data-center
Ugh, what a waste. That corner needs people there, not a datacenter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 6:22 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChickeNES View Post
Ugh, what a waste. That corner needs people there, not a datacenter.
It says from the article that the developer realized this problem and "He said he’s reached out to the University of Chicago and other possible commercial tenants that could keep the building full of employees, who could walk for lunch to the new Currency Exchange Café or visit the Washington Park Arts Incubator after work." They should have little trouble finding tenants if the library ends up in Washington Park.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 7:06 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
^ You don't see the slipperiness though in this at all? Really??

Some billionaires may end up having a funny view of what constitutes improvement of Chicago and Illinois.......and if the mayor and/or governor, etc, share in that view of improvement, we could be setting the stage here for real problems down the road........Also, what about just a hundred millionaire.....or few dozen millionaire? That's still pretty wealthy, why can't they have a crack at some of this park action? They've got ideas for improvin' this town as well, you know.

And, you always trust that Chicago/Illinois' leadership will be so wise and all-knowing as to not give parkland to Mariano's (or substitute whatever MORE prestigious, upscale, all-powerful private interest)? That's some real faith, man.

And, did you just call George Lucas one of the most influential people over the last 40 years?? I mean, I liked the original trilogy as much as the next guy, and appreciate the advances in the art and entertainment/media form therein, but that's just silly, all things considered.......
No I don't see it because there is no slipperiness, it's a logical fallacy. Until the time at which someone tries to build ANYTHING ELSE in a park beyond a museum, there is not slippery slope. We are not talking about a law that gives elected leaders carte blanche to do whatever they want with our parks outside of proper legal processes. We are talking about a bill that eliminates legal loopholes that FotP was using to try to logjam the process. The only thing this bill does is say that parks do not count as "navigable waters" which is a mind numbingly stupid (from a practical, not legal persepctive) argument to begin with.

Let me repeat myself again so this sinks in. The only thing that has been proposed here is not for profit museums. How is this anything new? Please, tell me how this sets a precedent that hasn't already been set half a dozen times? Please tell me how Marshall Field is allowed to build a museum in the park and George Lucas is not? Please tell me how the Shedd, MSI, AIC, Adler, and Mexican art museums are different than LMNA and Obama Library in even the most immaterial way. A slippery slope argument is nonsense to begin with, but we aren't even talking about a new slope here much less a slippery one. We've been standing on this hillside for 100+ years and haven't slid an inch, how does LMNA or Obama Library change that?


Oh and I stand by my statement about Lucas being one of the most influential people of the past few decades. He singlehandedly changed American culture more than just about any other individual since 1980. Pop culture changes the way we think as a society far more than anything else except maybe technology. Lucas completely changed how we tell stories and basically created the modern field of special effects. The original Star Wars is not just another cult fad, it's had a profound impact on almost everything in Pop Culture that came after it. I know it's popular to belittle pop art as something less than art, but I'm not sure that someone who completely changed the way an entire industry and art communicates can be trashed as some fad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted May 1, 2015, 7:24 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 939
A teeny, tiny, quibble LVDR - I don't think Lucas "single handedly changed American culture..." I think he and Steven Spielberg, separately and together, radically influenced American culture, and changed it in ways big and small.

Lucas is absolutely one of the most influential figures in the past 4+ decades.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:35 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.