Interesting point, Hecate, and I think it's a good one. I couldn't come up with any numbers, but what you're proposing looks more like how they do policing in Europe. There's an abundance of young police on any scene--they're where they need to be, there's enough of them to control anything, and they keep each other accountable. And they aren't pseudo 1% types like you see lording it around Winnipeg
Common sense post, drew. If social media is any indication, the police are all using mini tanks to bash doors down in the North End. The WPS pretty obviously needs a big culture shakeup where they go back to doing the actual police work you mentioned, instead of playing with whatever big-ticket toys their runaway budget affords them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisito
No I don't drugs. Sorry to disappoint you. Personal attacks, what a good argument.
|
So what is your excuse?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisito
So these services still exist?
|
If someone steals the rims from your car, your car still exists, but you can't very well drive it, can you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisito
Your profound ignorance and arrogance is why criminals feel justified in doing what they do. More and more excuses.
|
Amazing that you think I'm empowering criminals through something I'm not doing. I, for one, would never be so arrogant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisito
LOL If you think security on transit is a good idea, you're contradicting youself when you say more police presence wont solve anything, Yes increased Police presence(security) helps.
|
Maybe if I repeat my point enough times you'll actually read it.
Winnipeg already has an over-funded police force. Spending more on police won't solve anything.
You can make arguments about police presence all you want; I haven't once used the word "presence". I have talked about police funding. WPS and Winnipeg Transit are two different organizations with different budgets. Funding Winnipeg Transit to hire security--and security is not the same as police--is not the same as giving WPS more money with carte blanche to spend it on tanks or whatever bullshit they think they need.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luisito
You do. You just did several times.
|
It's pretty fantastic that you don't see a difference between causes and excuses. Fantastic in the sense that I can't believe what I'm reading. Your posts are like Smeagol goatse.
So, someone drinks while pregnant, hits their FAS kid growing up, keeps a revolving cast of shitheads coming around who abuse the kid, the kid has no impulse control so starts smoking meth, stealing, and assaulting people. There's a clear chain of causation there, and intervening as early as possible can interrupt it. We could fund, say, a women's shelter, which could take in that pregnant mother before she drinks her fetus stupid.
How in the fuck do you think that's making excuses? We intervene, there's nothing to excuse--there's no crime and no criminal. Instead we get a healthy member of society, who contributes and doesn't commit crimes.
We don't intervene, we get a bunch of badly broken people who do crime, we hold them responsible--as we should. We remove them from society for a while, eventually we let back in, they do more crime, we remove them from society for a while... Whatever they're doing they aren't healthy, productive members of society. It doesn't matter if we blame them for it, or get the police to fuck them up more.