Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBruin
Speaking of which, why did SF get hit so hard by covid?
It's jobs weren't more movable to remote positions than those in other metros, were they?
|
Well, Manhattan was 'hit' harder than SF was as far as jobs if that's what youre talking about.
Change in Number of Jobs, Mar 2020-March 2021
-11.4% Orange, FL
-12.1% Clark, NV
-12.2% Atlantic, NJ
-12.6% San Francisco, CA
-13.4% Honolulu, HI
-14.7% Orleans, LA
-14.7% New York, NY
Notice these^ places all have lots of food server or hospitality jobs? That's the commonality. Manhattan and SF are eating out meccas, that's where job losses were concentrated in those 2 imo, at least this data suggests that.
Ironically, at the same time, Manhattan and SF retained their positions as the 1st and 2nd highest earning counties in the country, at least as far as average weekly pay.
Average Weekly Pay by County, $2,000+(Mar 2020-March 2021 change)
$3,967 New York, NY(+21.0%)
$3,721 San Francisco, CA(+33.9%)
$3,585 San Mateo, CA(+22.1%)
$3,505 Santa Clara, CA(+20.7%)
$2,545 Suffolk, MA(+8.6%)
$2,220 Fairfield, CT(+8.2%)
$2,165 Washington, DC(+8.6%)
$2,152 King, WA(+11.2%)
$2,128 Morris, NJ(+1.5%)
$2,107 Middlesex, MA(+9.3%)
$2,077 Arlington, VA(+3.0%)
So as far as jobs and pay, SF and Manhattan fared pretty much the same.
We also know that as I write this, NYC and SF lead the nation in the increase in people looking to rent there, so when you say how did SF get hit so hard, I am hard pressed to really find a way in which that actually happened?
Especially given SFs low covid death and infection rate relative to most of the country(thank God)
But i digress. Thank you for asking, this prompted me to seek to justify youre statement, and sadly I was not.