Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rd&Brown
The middle class black population of Philadelphia is plummeting. They're moving to Atlanta (and the south in general), Delaware, and the suburbs.
|
This why, even though I’ve been reading this forum for nearly two decades, I comment rarely. And TempleGuy1000, I think your right that 3rd&Brown and I probably overlap in our views a lot more than is apparent (again, probably due to my not saying much here).
1. Can we please not lump all Black people together. The people I’m talking about are not the ones moving to Atlanta.
2. I intentionally didn’t use the words “Black” or “gentrification” because I didn’t want to distract from my main point: you can improve a neighborhood by addressing the problems of the people who live in the neighborhood or by filling the neighborhood with people who don’t have those problems. The latter can (but don’t necessarily always) push out that first group. I was commending the effort to try the former strategy.
The people being targeted by this plan aren’t the ones with the ability’s to just pick up and move to greener pastures in Atlanta or anywhere else. That’s why the investment is needed.
3. I’m not anti new people moving into a struggling neighborhood. I’m not anti development. I’m definitely not a NIMBY. But on this forum I sometimes get the “rearranging the furniture” vibe - making a neighborhood better by changing
who lives in it. Sometimes among people like “us” who are drawn to a space like this, there’s a temptation to think “we need this optimally located neighborhood to be better and for the greater good, the people who live her now can find another suitable place to live, and everyone willing benefit.” Which brings me to…
4. If we move people around but don’t invest in addressing core issues, we’ll continue to be plagued with problems like violence, poverty, struggling schools, etc. - the things we keep identifying as hindering our city’s growth. There’s definitely room for all of us, but all of us being together necessitates investment in all of us, especially those who have been historically marginalized and divested from.
All I did was applaud someone of taking the “invest in the people” approach. But it got spun into an “exhaustive narrative” about “gentrification.” I love this forum but sometimes there’s this kind of undercurrent that’s really off-putting to “normal(?)” people who would otherwise be in favor of the general direction of conversation here.
The attitude that gets projected feeds directly into the mindset that makes Darrell Clarke’s ridiculous Girard Avenue overlay possible. Y’all are right 90% of the time, and I’ve learned a ton here. But if you want to see change, development-oriented people gotta stop recklessly taking in ways that alienate large chunks of the city (i.e. voters) and start talking in ways that help people see their place on our vision of a better city.