HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 7:26 PM
moorhosj1 moorhosj1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Someone remind me please, why is the plan to build a new Near South Side high school "controversial?"
Some don't think it is needed and want the money invested in the existing schools in the area. Some don't like the previously proposed location, which included a CHA land swap.

CPS is committed to building it and The 78 has been a preferred location for those in Chinatown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 8:03 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,894
The more I read into this, the more I like the plan here. This has huge potential to really extend South to Chinatown and McCormick. I've been to McCormick for a conference and Chinatown once each. I like McCormick and Chinatown, but they feel a bit disconnected to the South Loop, even though it's not that far up. And if the Fire can take over Guaranteed Rate, all the better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 8:21 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorhosj1 View Post
Some don't think it is needed and want the money invested in the existing schools in the area. Some don't like the previously proposed location, which included a CHA land swap.
Plus the school was going to cost over $100 million, I don't understand how CPS came up with that figure. Someone could build two or three highrises with that kind of money
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 8:25 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,361
I like the idea of a downtown(sh) ballpark, but I hope they revisit the plans and locate it near the north side of the 78 off Roosevelt. It just seems to make more sense logistically, given that from the corner of Roosevelt/Clark, it is .20 miles to the Roosevelt L station.

There is a slew of off-site parking near Roosevelt/Canal, only .30 miles across the current viaduct. It is only a 1.15-mile walk from the Daley Center compared to a 1.50-mile walk if located near Clark/15th. Plus, I don't think the future 5k residents would love having the glare of the stadium lights shining in their windows nor much of the foot traffic wandering through the neighborhood on their way back north towards Roosevelt (which will serve as the main thoroughfare for the stadium regardless of where it is located at the 78). Having the stadium above grade on the north end would also make it easier to put below-grade parking and operations under a stadium plaza near the outfield gates connecting off of Roosevelt.

Also, I think the visibility of it being off Roosevelt is better from a promotional point of view than being tucked away in the southern section of the 78. A plaza off of Roosevelt wrapping around the ballpark would also provide a much more seamless graded transition to Wells Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 8:30 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 775
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
I like the idea of a downtown(sh) ballpark, but I hope they revisit the plans and locate it near the north side of the 78 off Roosevelt. It just seems to make more sense logistically, given that from the corner of Roosevelt/Clark, it is .20 miles to the Roosevelt L station.

There is a slew of off-site parking near Roosevelt/Canal, only .30 miles across the current viaduct. It is only a 1.15-mile walk from the Daley Center compared to a 1.50-mile walk if located near Clark/15th. Plus, I don't think the future 5k residents would love having the glare of the stadium lights shining in their windows nor much of the foot traffic wandering through the neighborhood on their way back north towards Roosevelt (which will serve as the main thoroughfare for the stadium regardless of where it is located at the 78). Having the stadium above grade on the north end would also make it easier to put below-grade parking and operations under a stadium plaza near the outfield gates connecting off of Roosevelt.

Also, I think the visibility of it being off Roosevelt is better from a promotional point of view than being tucked away in the southern section of the 78. A plaza off of Roosevelt wrapping around the ballpark would also provide a much more seamless graded transition to Wells Street.
The biggest problem with that idea is the rock island metra line would be going right under it making everything more complicated including utilizing below grade spaces.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 9:22 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klippenstein View Post
The biggest problem with that idea is the rock island metra line would be going right under it making everything more complicated including utilizing below grade spaces.
I thought about that. You may be right. I was unsure where exactly the RI tracks should start their descent according to the current plans. I figure that wherever you put the ballpark, the RI line grade separation will have to be part of the project and run under the ballpark, given that I don't think the ballpark will be able to be built except over the RI line.

I figure why not start the below-grade rail separation a bit further north than planned (perhaps even starting at the Roosevelt Collection) so it can clear under the ballpark if it was situated on the north end.

Last edited by nomarandlee; Jan 23, 2024 at 11:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 10:04 PM
moorhosj1 moorhosj1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Plus the school was going to cost over $100 million, I don't understand how CPS came up with that figure. Someone could build two or three highrises with that kind of money
High rises are a lot different than schools. The new Englewood STEM school cost $85 million in 2019. A Walter Payton annex building for 400 students cost $20 million in 2016.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 11:51 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,375
edit
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2024, 11:52 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Someone remind me please, why is the plan to build a new Near South Side high school "controversial?"
This I believe.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2024, 8:51 AM
BruceP BruceP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 60
Personally, I don't care what they do as long as they honor all their financial obligations to the state for their current playlot and don't get a dime in government monies for a new one. Let these billionaire club owners pay for their for-profit toys out of their own pockets.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2024, 11:25 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorhosj1 View Post
High rises are a lot different than schools. The new Englewood STEM school cost $85 million in 2019. A Walter Payton annex building for 400 students cost $20 million in 2016.
Jones is probably the best comparison here as an urban vertical high school. And that cost $113M way back in 2015. I'd say if they can build Near South for only $100M a decade later, that is a bargain!
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2024, 12:10 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Plus the school was going to cost over $100 million, I don't understand how CPS came up with that figure. Someone could build two or three highrises with that kind of money

2 or 3 highrises? In 2024? Made out of what??
I would expect a new school to cost at least around that much.
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 4:31 AM
MorganChi's Avatar
MorganChi MorganChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 177
Dave kapland who covers all of Chicago sports and who has a morning show on ESPN 1000 says he has a close source that works in white Sox organization. The source tells him the stadium is pretty much a done deal. As a bulls and bears fan I can tell you Dave Kaplan’s sources are always on the mark.


https://youtu.be/9Mi5IbBymDA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 4:52 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,825
This all seems to be happening so fast.

But hey, I'm 100% in support of the sox staying in Chicago instead of going to fucking Nashville or sunbelt wherever.

There's only one city in the world that has both an old school national League team and an old school American league team still playing in their original city.

Let's pray to Pizza God that it stays that way.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Jan 27, 2024 at 5:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 5:30 AM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorganChi View Post
Dave kapland who covers all of Chicago sports and who has a morning show on ESPN 1000 says he has a close source that works in white Sox organization. The source tells him the stadium is pretty much a done deal. As a bulls and bears fan I can tell you Dave Kaplan’s sources are always on the mark.


https://youtu.be/9Mi5IbBymDA
Oh boy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 7:27 AM
BrickellBased BrickellBased is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 189
Something rather amusing about how the adjacent NIMBYs were complaining about the casino pitch may now be getting a MLB stadium instead.

I assume they'd redo the dank Roosevelt Red Line there as well and there'd be a considerable facelift to the surrounding area.

Also if they break ground for sure I could see this resulting in a development boom in the South Loop area - maybe even giving hope to a NEMA II.

In the interest of all skyscraper nerds, I say build it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 3:46 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,237
If the city/state is going to spend the money to keep a team this is immeasurably better than an NFL stadium. Hopefully this forecloses the possibility helping the Bears out in any real way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 4:45 PM
DalronJ's Avatar
DalronJ DalronJ is offline
Dalron J
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 13
This would probably become my favorite project ever if this can be done right. I'm going to keep dreaming for

- Riverline & Southbank to fully complete
- A Bears Stadium/Dome on the level of SOFI built on/near the Soldier Field Site
- One Central
- Some type of train transit to connect all of these together, maybe even with the convention center also. (A Loop in the south loop)
- Also wouldn't mind a soccer venue somewhere in the downtown vicinity.
__________________
“Buildings are deeply emotive structures which form our psyche. People think they're just things they maneuver through, but the makeup of a person is influenced by the nature of spaces.” - David Adjaye
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 4:45 PM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Curious if the sox do move what the plan would be with the current field they play at. Tear it down? Repurpose? The sox had problems filling that stadium unlike Wriggley. Since there are so many less sox fans than cubs fans they are going to need a winning team to fill it.


https://www.chicagomag.com/city-life...d-school-park/

The White Sox Need a New, Old-School Park
Guaranteed Rate Field was built right before the retro ballpark movement, and it lacks the cozy atmosphere that could make it a destination.


BY EDWARD ROBERT MCCLELLAND
JANUARY 25, 2024, 1:15 PM

Last edited by bnk; Jan 27, 2024 at 5:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2024, 5:09 PM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
Curious if the sox do move what the plan would be with the current field they play at. Tear it down? Repurpose? The sox had problems filling that stadium unlike Wriggley. Since there are so many less sox fans than cubs fans they are going to need a winning team to fill it.


https://www.chicagomag.com/city-life...d-school-park/

The White Sox Need a New, Old-School Park
Guaranteed Rate Field was built right before the retro ballpark movement, and it lacks the cozy atmosphere that could make it a destination.


BY EDWARD ROBERT MCCLELLAND
JANUARY 25, 2024, 1:15 PM
Would Chicago Fire be interested? Could the park be retrofitted into a soccer stadium?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.