HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2021, 7:56 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Berlin Voters Asked The City To Tackle Rising Rents. The Plan Is A Long Shot

Berlin Voters Asked The City To Tackle Rising Rents. The Plan Is A Long Shot, But The Message Is Powerful.


September 29, 2021

By Adam Taylor

Read More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...nt-referendum/

Quote:
.....

On Sunday, voters in the German capital backed a nonbinding referendum that called on the local government to buy hundreds of thousands of housing units from large property companies in the latest bid to control Berlin’s spiraling rent. An estimated 240,000 apartments, about 10 percent of the city’s housing stock, would end up in public hands if the radical proposal is carried out.

- The referendum has no legal power. Previous attempts to counter rising rent in Berlin have struggled, with a cap on housing prices overturned by Germany’s top court in April. And just how will expropriating hundreds of thousands of apartments work anyway? — Still, the message to authorities was powerful: It received more than 56 percent of the vote. On Monday, Berlin’s new mayor said she would “respect” the results of the referendum and go about drafting a new bill. Even if not, the referendum’s organizers have said they could bring together a new, binding referendum if the law is delayed. — If it works, this unorthodox approach to municipal housing could reverberate far outside the German capital. “It can be a catalyst for municipal housing movements across Europe,” Alexander Vasudevan, an associate professor in human geography at the University of Oxford, wrote for the Guardian this week.

- Rent in the German capital remains lower than in many other major world cities. Renting a two-bedroom apartment in Berlin cost less than a third of what a similar apartment in Hong Kong or San Francisco would cost, Deutsche Bank has estimated, and half of a similar apartment in Paris or London. — But the city’s rental market has been changing, and that has become a vexing issue for Berliners. The city, divided for 30 years during the Cold War, had once stood out as a place where the low cost of living could enable people to not worry so much about salaries. — But its ever-increasing appeal has pushed rents higher and higher, challenging that very feature. According to international property firm Knight Frank, between 2010 and 2018, the city’s population increased by about 360,000. During that same eight-year period, only 86,370 new homes were built.

- In a city where roughly 85 percent of residents rent rather than own, the rental market has been squeezed the hardest, with rents increasing by 42 percent over the past five years, the most of any German city, Berliner Zeitung reported this year. With housing supply so low, the issue isn’t just rental prices. Apartments are often snapped up within hours of being listed or even less. In November 2019, an apartment viewing in the popular neighborhood of Schöneberg drew headlines for attracting 1,800 potential renters. — Much of the anger has been directed at large property companies and international investment groups that have bought up rental units across Berlin, partly by buying apartments once owned by the city but sold off during a period of financial distress in the 2000s. The largest of these corporate landlords, Deutsche Wohnen SE, owns more than 113,000 apartments.

- The ambition of the Berlin referendum has led to hope overseas. For some, it has changed a conversation that has focused on relatively small reforms and older tactics, such as rent control. Writing for the Conversation before the referendum, the University of Cambridge’s Joanna Kusiak said that the “the move could provide a legal precedent for other cities to call for nationalization as a modern and legitimate solution to their housing crises” and perhaps even prompt changes in international law that could empower housing as a human right. As Vasudevan put it in the Guardian, the result shows that “What is needed are creative, large-scale solutions that tackle housing insecurity and empower residents to challenge their increasing marginalization and vulnerability.” Given rising home prices in much of the world, such solutions are needed a long way from the German capital, too.

.....


__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2021, 8:35 AM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
Does Germany have a similar concept of providing just compensation when private property is taking? If so, where will Berlin get the the billions of euros necessary to purchase these market rate apartments and operate them at below market rate.

I'm going to lowball here and say the average apartment in Berlin $300,000... That's 240,000 x $300,000 = $72 billion.

Or is this just a feel good symbolic effort to protest high housing costs and nothing will be done.

Who would have thought that keeping interest rates at 0% would have consequences.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2021, 12:19 PM
Yuri's Avatar
Yuri Yuri is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,478
I tend to believe this won't work. They don't have the money to do it, and even if they did, this money could be put in use in much more helpful projects, for instance, to build new houses.

The answer here, it's the same: build more. Period. Berlin went through a mini-population in the past ten years and as the article mentions, didn't build enough. Same story in London, San Francisco, Stockholm.
__________________
London - São Paulo - Rio de Janeiro - Londrina - Frankfurt
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2021, 7:37 PM
chicago river chicago river is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 11
Allowing one person to own another person's home is a terrible idea and has zero positive effects on society as a whole. Landlords are leeches. Even the godfather of capitalism, Adam Smith, agrees.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2021, 8:10 PM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by C. View Post
Does Germany have a similar concept of providing just compensation when private property is taking? If so, where will Berlin get the the billions of euros necessary to purchase these market rate apartments and operate them at below market rate.

I'm going to lowball here and say the average apartment in Berlin $300,000... That's 240,000 x $300,000 = $72 billion.

Or is this just a feel good symbolic effort to protest high housing costs and nothing will be done.

Who would have thought that keeping interest rates at 0% would have consequences.
The answers to all of your questions are here:

https://www.darumenteignen.de/en/
__________________
no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2021, 8:59 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicago river View Post
Allowing one person to own another person's home is a terrible idea and has zero positive effects on society as a whole. Landlords are leeches. Even the godfather of capitalism, Adam Smith, agrees.
Except that real estate is a valuable asset and landowners are probably the second oldest profession after prostitutes.

If you don’t have a concept of renting or otherwise paying to occupy a dwelling owned by another person, then what do people with no assets do? Build a lean-to?

The real problem is anything that keeps supply from matching demand. Otherwise buildings have a replacement cost, based on materials and labor, which should increase over time but in line with general inflation, rather than vastly outpacing it.

Some of these things are worthwhile, like historic preservation to retain cultural patrimony and aesthetics. But there’s a lot of stuff - ranging from regulations to graft - that impede supply. Think about those things.
__________________
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." - Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 2:01 AM
chicago river chicago river is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10023 View Post
Landowners are probably the second oldest profession after prostitutes.
We criminalize one group, why not the other?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 2:07 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicago river View Post
Allowing one person to own another person's home is a terrible idea and has zero positive effects on society as a whole. Landlords are leeches. Even the godfather of capitalism, Adam Smith, agrees.
Lots of people have become "leeches" by investing in a few rental units with the idea that the cash flow from the same will fund their retirement.

We have one or two such landlords among us. I have argued with them that I'd rather put the portion of my assets I want to have in real estate in professionally managed REITs just because I don't want to have to deal with this attitude along with the other unpleasant aspects of being a landlord. REIT managements have the money and connections to fight "city hall" when necessary where individuals don't, and if it comes to it, they are more likely to get fair compensation for property taken from them by government.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 2:49 AM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: At a computer, wasting my life on a skyscraper website
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicago river View Post
We criminalize one group, why not the other?
Because landlords are a specific example of a much broader problem in economics known as rent-seeking, where you have people getting something, rent, for doing nothing. This problem is not solved by doing away with landlords.. because taking the properties away from the landlords without compensation and giving them to some other group leads to, well, the same thing; people getting something for nothing.

The solution, in my view, is to enforce a maximum profit margin, something like 5%. If a landlord makes more than that, they have to either give it back directly or invest it in improving the living space for their tenant(s). The other option obviously would be to lower their rent so that profits stay at 5%.

This way, it still makes economic sense for property owners to provide living space for renters (because theyre still making a profit), but it ensures that most rent money goes to either improving the living space or back into the tenants' pockets.

This would also solve the problem of property owners sitting with vacant housing waiting for more profitable tenants.

To prevent such a system from deterring new development, you could make it so that the profit control doesnt kick in until a building is 20 years old.
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 3:54 AM
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Loma Linda, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,571
Yeah, housing for profit, like healthcare and other baseline things in our society for profit, is a shitty game to play for everyone involved.

I understand landlords need to pay their bills and make some living, but gradually increasing the rent for tenants who often have incomes that are continuing to be stretched thin just sounds awful.

And, no, telling the tenants ( if they are reliable and pay on time) that they just have to accept the rising rent or get the fuck out, is not the most realistic thing to do. Not every neighborhood is going to attract high paying individuals.


I like that profit cap idea. It may actually help foster a better relationship between tenants and landlords.
__________________
Working towards making American cities walkable again!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 4:44 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd3189 View Post
Yeah, housing for profit, like healthcare and other baseline things in our society for profit, is a shitty game to play for everyone involved.

I understand landlords need to pay their bills and make some living, but gradually increasing the rent for tenants who often have incomes that are continuing to be stretched thin just sounds awful.

And, no, telling the tenants ( if they are reliable and pay on time) that they just have to accept the rising rent or get the fuck out, is not the most realistic thing to do. Not every neighborhood is going to attract high paying individuals.


I like that profit cap idea. It may actually help foster a better relationship between tenants and landlords.
Landlords are leeches who exploit people's need for a basic necessity. Others have stated that "real estate" is an "asset" or "commodity". Starting from that point is already bad (I know you weren't one of those individuals) - housing is a basic necessity and vulgarizing it into the exploitative real estate market is extremely egregious.

There's a lot of assumptions that people make in a lot of these discussions, such as "well what about the need for assets?" or "but if we get rid of landlords then something equivalent will pop back up in its place" or whatever. None of these assumptions are challenged, and so most are forced with working within them. But, if you decide, say, assets are a complete fiction that don't need to exist and can actually be a dumb way of relating to things, then you can open up to greater possibilities.

With that in mind, no, landlords don't need to make income from their tenants. They could just get a real job like the rest of us instead of being parasites to society. They don't need to exist. Housing could be held in common (which, despite the Eurocentric lens this discussion has taken, has existed throughout history) or run by the state. Vienna is a great example of the latter in action.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 5:04 AM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 37,784
Landlords should absolutely be able to turn a profit...within reason of course...but they are the ones who purchase the property, pay any and all fees and maintenance, taxes, insurance and then incur any risks/ liabilities. This sense of entitlement escapes me and I rented for most of my adult life...often from shitty landlords or leasing companies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 5:39 AM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: At a computer, wasting my life on a skyscraper website
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by JManc View Post
Landlords should absolutely be able to turn a profit...within reason of course...but they are the ones who purchase the property, pay any and all fees and maintenance, taxes, insurance and then incur any risks/ liabilities. This sense of entitlement escapes me and I rented for most of my adult life...often from shitty landlords or leasing companies.
Exactly.

And the costs associated with being a landlord arent just financial either; it is extremely time consuming and tedious. This is why most properties are owned or managed by companies, rather than individuals. Idk if Ue has ever had to deal with a cable company like Comcast or AT&T, but being a landlord is like that, 24/7.

So for a landlord to profit, the opportunity cost needs to be included as well. Otherwise, why devote any time to your tenant's needs? When opportunity costs arent included in rent, thats when you end up with people living in squalid conditions. If you own a building and your cable/internet gets screwed up, why would you spend an hour on hold with Comcast, followed by a conversation with some dude in Bangladesh, followed by an entire day stuck waiting for the damn truck to show up, if you'd be better off just ignoring the problem and working somewhere for $15 an hour during all that time? The cable example is just to illustrate the point, but if you want to see how serious this problem is, just think about plumbing, or mold.
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 5:46 AM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbermingham123 View Post

The solution, in my view, is to enforce a maximum profit margin, something like 5%.

Please. Most landlords in the United States break even or lose money. The only ones who are wildly profitable are those who acquire their property for free or at an extreme bargain and who lobby for special property tax breaks.

A mere 12 years ago, tens of thousands of landlords lost their properties because there weren't enough tenants.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 5:46 AM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: At a computer, wasting my life on a skyscraper website
Posts: 742
To Ue's point, collective ownership is great, but only when it is organized organically and people are free to participate or choose not to. This is left-libertarianism, and it can work! Co-ops are becoming more common by the day, and I invite Ue to find one and join.

The problem is when people want to use the legal system to enforce this model on the whole of society, because there are plenty of situations for which the model is ill-suited. That is the authoritarian-left model. Funny enough, these days it is often those same authoritarian-left people who want to reduce the state's power to enforce laws
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 5:54 AM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: At a computer, wasting my life on a skyscraper website
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
Please. Most landlords in the United States break even or lose money. The only ones who are wildly profitable are those who acquire their property for free or at an extreme bargain and who lobby for special property tax breaks.

A mere 12 years ago, tens of thousands of landlords lost their properties because there weren't enough tenants.
Yeah, i dont dispute any of that... the real-estate market gets tighter and tighter every year, especially where i live in STL

My intention with that post was purely theoretical, as a speculative solution to the problem of rent-seeking in the abstract
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 5:58 AM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by ue View Post

With that in mind, no, landlords don't need to make income from their tenants. They could just get a real job like the rest of us instead of being parasites to society.
I am a landlord. I have worked 2+ jobs continuously since graduating from college in 2005. I still work two jobs despite owning two houses, land, and a six-digit retirement fund. It's 1:50am eastern, I just got off work after working 4pm-1:30am on Sunday night at the sports bar. I made $170 in tips (another thing the leftists want to make illegal). I walk home, see this anti-landlord nonsense being posted on this forum, and can't help but roll my eyes. I'm clocking in at 8:00am this morning at my day job. I'm also waiting on a rent check...we'll see if dude who has his place filled with hammocks and bean bag chairs manages to get off his lazy ass and write me a check by the 5th.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 6:15 AM
chicago river chicago river is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 11
Prove it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 6:16 AM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: At a computer, wasting my life on a skyscraper website
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by ue View Post
Landlords are leeches who exploit people's need for a basic necessity. They could just get a real job like the rest of us instead of being parasites to society. They don't need to exist.
From a philosophical standpoint, this is a textbook example of the deep ideological bond between –and shared foundation/common ancestry of– fascism and communism.

Just replace the above "landlords" with "Jews" and then switch back and forth.

200 million dead
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2021, 7:59 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd3189 View Post
Yeah, housing for profit, like healthcare and other baseline things in our society for profit, is a shitty game to play for everyone involved.

I understand landlords need to pay their bills and make some living, but gradually increasing the rent for tenants who often have incomes that are continuing to be stretched thin just sounds awful.

And, no, telling the tenants ( if they are reliable and pay on time) that they just have to accept the rising rent or get the fuck out, is not the most realistic thing to do. Not every neighborhood is going to attract high paying individuals.


I like that profit cap idea. It may actually help foster a better relationship between tenants and landlords.
I'll just address health care. I have worked 36 hours straight at times. I have watched people I came to actually love die because they had incurable diseases. More than a few times I actually cried when I got home. And almost every day I wondered if decisions I made or things I did were correct. Feelings of inadequacy go with the territory if you aren't an egotist.

Like most people, I'm no saint. Many people here think I'm a jerk I expect (and few make that clear almost daily). So I have to admit I wouldn't have done any of this and rather would have done something with regular hours and decisions about something like money rather than peoples' lives if it didn't pay well. If you think doing what people in health care do shouldn't involve profit (or relatively high pay), you are dreaming. Saints aside, nobody puts themselves through what doctors and nurses do for peanuts nor do they put the hours and sweat others put into late nights in a lab inventing new drugs or tabulating data for a research project (or the thesis it took to qualify them to do the work). Yeah, the work can certainly be fulfilling but not enough to have to worry about paying your own mortgage or putting your kids through college on top of everything else.

So I think your comment is just ignorant.

As for landlords, that's no fun either IMHO which is why I've chosen not to get involved in it. Who needs calls from bitchy tenants at all hours?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.