HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


    One Oak in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • San Francisco Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
San Francisco Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2021, 6:44 PM
tall/awkward tall/awkward is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 175
Ha! I just saw the original proposal next to the title of this thread. Great reminder of how downhill these things can go.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2021, 8:17 PM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 706
Quote:
Originally Posted by hruski View Post
Off-topic, but does anyone else find socketsite's editorial style aggravating? Each sentence begins with about 3 prepositional phrases, and the lede of each post tends to be buried about 3/4 of the way in.
The bad statistical analyses and belligerence are what put me off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2021, 8:47 PM
homebucket homebucket is offline
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,790
It got uglier but at least the number of units went up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted May 26, 2022, 3:31 PM
homebucket homebucket is offline
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,790
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted May 26, 2022, 3:36 PM
unpermitted_variance unpermitted_variance is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Oakland
Posts: 114
A little bit less ugly than the last set of renderings. Overall I think I can live with this design, I'd just be happy to see something tall get built there at this point.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted May 26, 2022, 3:38 PM
homebucket homebucket is offline
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by unpermitted_variance View Post
A little bit less ugly than the last set of renderings. Overall I think I can live with this design, I'd just be happy to see something tall get built there at this point.
Agreed. I like that they brought back the taper at the top, which it seems was removed from the most recent renderings prior to this. I like that they added the outdoor terraces on the "back" side facing the 13th floor amenity deck/podium to help break up the massing, but would've liked them to retain the outdoor terrace on the Market and Van Ness side as well, just for more visual interest. But at this point, let's just get it done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted May 26, 2022, 6:20 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
I am not excited with this latest version. The original concept was much more dynamic. BUT, I am glad to see this important site still in play.
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2022, 4:50 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
San Francisco Planning Dept. NOTICE for hearing on June 16, 2022
I had not realized that my camera cut off part of the notice until I got home, but there is enough information. I will go back to get a full photo of the notice later. Good to see movement on this project!

ONE OAK STREET - San Francisco Planning Department NOTICE
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2022, 4:59 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
This information from the San Francisco Planning Department web site:

Notice is hereby given to the general public that applications involving the properties and/or issues described below have been filed with the Planning Department for review as set forth in the City Planning Code. The Planning Commission intends to hold a PUBLIC HEARING on these items and on other matters on Thursday, June 16, 2022, beginning at 1:00 p.m. or later. Please be advised that due to the COVID-19 emergency, the Planning Commission may conduct this hearing remotely using videoconferencing technology or in-person at City Hall. Additional information may be found on the Department’s website.

2021-007611DNXSHDVAR, 2009.0159E: 1500-1540 MARKET STREET (AKA “ONE OAK”) – located on the north side of Market Street, bounded by Oak Street to the north and Van Ness Avenue to the east; Lots 001, 002, 003, 004 and 005 in Assessor’s Block 0836 (District 5) – 1) Request for Downtown Project Authorization pursuant to Planning Code Sections 210.2 and 309 to allow a project greater than 50,000 square feet of floor area within the C-3 Zoning District with exceptions for useable open space (Section 135); permitted obstructions (decorative architectural features) over sidewalks (Section 136); exposure (Section 140); reduction of ground-level wind currents (Section 148); lot coverage (Section 249.33); volumetric limitations for roof enclosures and screens (Section 260); and bulk (Section 270); 2) Request for Variance pursuant to Section 305 to permit relief from the strict requirements of the Planning Code related to above-grade parking setback requirements (Section 145.1(c)(1)); and 3) Request for Height Exemption pursuant to Section 305 to permit relief from the strict limits of the Planning Code for the height of the elevator penthouse to accommodate the elevator overrun (Section 260(b)(1)(B)); 4) Adoption of Shadow Findings pursuant to Section 295 that net new shadows attributable to the Project would not adversely affect the use of either Patricia's Green, or Page & Laguna Mini-Park, two properties under the jurisdiction of the Recreation and Park Commission (Section 295); and 5) Adoption of Findings and Adoption of Statement of Overriding Considerations under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project (“Project”) includes demolition of two, existing buildings containing non-residential uses plus a surface parking lot and construction of a new 40-story building reaching a roof height up to 400 feet tall (approximately 416 feet tall inclusive of mechanical equipment, or 437 feet tall inclusive of elevator overrun and rooftop screening). The Project includes a Gross Floor Area of approximately 455,000 gross square feet of residential uses, and approximately 2,500 gross square feet of ground floor retail use, with a total of 460 dwelling units comprised of 100 studio units, 159 one-bedroom units, and 201 two-bedroom units. The Project includes 112 off-street accessory parking spaces and 3 car share spaces contained within a parking stacker, 1 off-street freight loading space and 2 off-street service loading vehicle spaces, and 190 Class 1 and 25 Class 2 bicycle parking spaces. To further activate the ground floor experience, the Project includes construction of a public plaza and shared public way within a portion of the Oak Street right-of-way (Oak Plaza). At a later date, the Project Sponsor will seek approval of an In-Kind Fee Waiver Agreement pursuant to Planning Code, to provide certain additional public realm improvements within Oak Plaza. These additional public realm improvements are subject to the Planning Commission’s separate and future approval of the Project Sponsor’s In-Kind Fee Waiver Agreement. The subject property is located within the C-3-G (Downtown General) Zoning District, 120/400-R-2 and 120-R-2 Height and Bulk Districts, and Van Ness & Market Downtown Residential Special Use District. A Planning Commission approval at the public hearing would constitute the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Section 31.04(h). For further information, call Nicholas Foster at (628) 652-7330 or email at nicholas.foster@sfgov.org and ask about Case Nos. 2021-007611DNXSHDVAR, 2009.0159E.
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2022, 4:36 AM
theskysthelimit theskysthelimit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 42
Looks like it passed the planning department. I only give it a 25% chance of getting built.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/articl...t-17306254.php
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2022, 1:54 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by theskysthelimit View Post
Looks like it passed the planning department. I only give it a 25% chance of getting built.

http://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/articl...t-17306254.php
What makes you say that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2022, 3:31 AM
theskysthelimit theskysthelimit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
What makes you say that?
Well reading the article, the developer said that it is unlikely to get funded. This project has been going on for quite sometime and if they could not get funding during the good times with almost free Money, interest rates, it does not look promising during these times.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2023, 11:11 PM
unpermitted_variance unpermitted_variance is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Oakland
Posts: 114
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2023, 12:24 AM
homebucket homebucket is offline
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,790
Not surprising but disappointing nonetheless.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2023, 1:24 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
I was hopeful. At my age I doubt that I will ever see this spot developed. Maybe a much smaller building will happen. I am so happy with 30 Van Ness across the street is in construction!
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2023, 2:49 AM
theskysthelimit theskysthelimit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 42
Just a thought. Maybe the developer who wants to build a skyscraper in the Sunset (which will never be approved) would take over this spot?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2023, 6:13 AM
Charmy2 Charmy2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by unpermitted_variance View Post
thats sad, i really liked this project. that corner is so ugly...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2023, 3:31 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
SFist says that: "SF Business Times reports that the long-proposed One Oak apartment tower has surrendered the site to its banking lender, amidst a reported $44 million in outstanding debt." More sad news. There were some beautiful proposals for the site.
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2023, 3:29 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,165
Ugh... still waiting for the next SF high rise to break ground
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2023, 6:02 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillynova View Post
Ugh... still waiting for the next SF high rise to break ground
I guess the best bet is to have the 500 footer on Van Ness continue or maybe the new 70+ story tower in Rincon Hill break ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.