Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM
What I meant by that, is that whoever manages the site should come up with strict criteria for what needs to be built (other than functional docks say) and then allow private companies to build the buildings and take on the operation of the buildings (whatever those buildings turn into). Was there ever a RFP?
|
I self censored my previous comments again! Lol
My position is this is really green space / public realm and does not need much more than dock and landscaping. There is lots of other land in the area to build architecture.
The idea a building would go up on front of RNDSQR and block the view after their investment does not sit well me either.
What you are proposing is a CV approach and unfortunately it has its limitations.
St Regis site going on 10 years, Market Lands and Market Lands 2 going on seven years, Duncan / Galt / Waterfront going on four years. Tens of Millions have been spent on acquisition, studies, consultants and consultation. None of them are fully funded yet, have building permits or have broken ground. (Although I wish they all were).
My point being it’s been going on for years and this approach would / could drag on for another 5.
There must be political will from the mayor’s office, the councillor and maybe provincial interest as well.
I’m saying for very little let’s drop in some new piling and landscape the area until it’s figured out.
If the land was under The Forks mandate I truly believe a successful solution would be arrived at vs the alternative.
I’m just so tired of the current situation with no movement or solution. 4 or 5 development sites are on hold until a solution is found.