HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


    Old Post Office Redevelopment Tower [1] in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 2:16 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbana View Post
Can this be moved to proposal finally? It was outlandish in the beginning, but at this point seems very real.
I just moved it back to the active side of the development news forum.
__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 3:21 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbana View Post
Can this be moved to proposal finally? It was outlandish in the beginning, but at this point seems very real.

Not at all. Doesn't look any more real from the first proposal a couple years ago. This would have gargantuan odds against it even if it were proposed by a developer that actually had a half-decent or better track record with major real estate developments (in the hundreds of millions or higher), which Bill Davies, absolutely, positively does not, as you will read about in the linked to article below (this is an easily falsifiable statement, so anybody who disagrees with it should be able to readily provide contrary evidence, of which there is none!)

http://arcchicago.blogspot.com/2013/...-old-post.html

All this is is a land/development rights play. It's blatantly obvious, and nobody should allow their brain to be eaten by goofy boisterous boosterish salesmen trying to convince them otherwise....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 3:52 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 41,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_am_hydrogen View Post
Phase One:





I don't know what the odds are, but its phased over a number of years. So if something comes out of it, its a good thing.
__________________
NEW YORK. World's capital.

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 4:00 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
N, N-Dimethyltryptamine
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: New Jersey - Somerset County
Posts: 29,051
This would be really nice. Lets hope it happens. That area is somewhat empty this would definitely help bring balance to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 5:29 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,597
Phases One (center), Two (right), and Three (left):
__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 8:47 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Not at all. Doesn't look any more real from the first proposal a couple years ago. This would have gargantuan odds against it even if it were proposed by a developer that actually had a half-decent or better track record with major real estate developments (in the hundreds of millions or higher), which Bill Davies, absolutely, positively does not, as you will read about in the linked to article below (this is an easily falsifiable statement, so anybody who disagrees with it should be able to readily provide contrary evidence, of which there is none!)

http://arcchicago.blogspot.com/2013/...-old-post.html

All this is is a land/development rights play. It's blatantly obvious, and nobody should allow their brain to be eaten by goofy boisterous boosterish salesmen trying to convince them otherwise....
All you are doing is citing from an opinionated source. We will see if anything happens in two months as most newspapers suggest. Until then there is enough newspaper articles to prove that this project is real..........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2013, 9:49 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
N, N-Dimethyltryptamine
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: New Jersey - Somerset County
Posts: 29,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_am_hydrogen View Post
Phases One (center), Two (right), and Three (left):
Love those huge twin antennas. So Chi Town Right there. Intimidating they are.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2013, 1:26 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,060
Why is it that whenever there's a proposal of exceptional height, all the most sophisticated analytical thinkers surface?
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2013, 6:49 PM
HomrQT's Avatar
HomrQT HomrQT is offline
All-American City Boy
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Forest Park / Uptown, Chicago
Posts: 1,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Why is it that whenever there's a proposal of exceptional height, all the most sophisticated analytical thinkers surface?
You banging your head against the wall saying it's not real is just as absurd as people saying it will happen. No one knows, let's just sit back and watch. If they are putting out renderings, we'll post them and see if it ever comes to fruition. If the project never happens and a bunch of skyscraper lovers had their hopes up, then.... so what?
__________________
1. 111 W 57 - Manhattan, New York - SHoP Architects - Photo
2. 9 Dekalb Ave - Brooklyn, New York - SHoP Architects - Photo
3. One Chicago Square - Chicago - HPA and Goettsch Partners - Photo
4. Chicago Board of Trade - Chicago - Holabird & Root - Photo
5. Cathedral of Learning - Pittsburgh - Charles Klauder - Photo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 1:23 AM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Why is it that whenever there's a proposal of exceptional height, all the most sophisticated analytical thinkers surface?
Many people in the United States have been let down before by nice skyscraper proposals that failed. I can name several. The Chicago Spire, the Chicago World Trade Center, the NYSE Tower, the Signature Tower, the Miglin Beitler Skyneedle, 7 South Dearborn, and etc. Meanwhile China and Dubai build 2,000+ footers like nothing. This is why so many Americans have lost hope. You can't blame them..........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 2:03 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
N, N-Dimethyltryptamine
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: New Jersey - Somerset County
Posts: 29,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
Many people in the United States have been let down before by nice skyscraper proposals that failed. I can name several. The Chicago Spire, the Chicago World Trade Center, the NYSE Tower, the Signature Tower, the Miglin Beitler Skyneedle, 7 South Dearborn, and etc. Meanwhile China and Dubai build 2,000+ footers like nothing. This is why so many Americans have lost hope. You can't blame them..........
Especially considering Chi town invented the skyscraper. But there's optimism. We will catch no worries.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 3:32 AM
NYC GUY's Avatar
NYC GUY NYC GUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 575
Once I read World's tallest I think my heart jumped a bit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 3:48 AM
texcolo's Avatar
texcolo texcolo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Truth or Consequences, NM
Posts: 4,262
Is that Roosevelt Avenue that goes under the post office?

I like the idea of the development, and wouldn't be surprised if A tower gets built, but have a hard time seeing the entire plan get built out.

Also: It sure would be nice if they'd spend the money on getting Caletrava's Chicago Spire built instead.
__________________
"I am literally grasping at straws." - Bob Belcher
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 4:04 AM
Yackemflaber69's Avatar
Yackemflaber69 Yackemflaber69 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 584
why not both?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 4:29 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
N, N-Dimethyltryptamine
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: New Jersey - Somerset County
Posts: 29,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by texcolo View Post

Also: It sure would be nice if they'd spend the money on getting Caletrava's Chicago Spire built instead.
The market would probably support Calatrava's. Just look at NYC luxury market for ultra expensive units. I'm sure they would sell units. Problem is the financing but I'm sure the original developers of this will want to eventually make it happen. A lot of pre 2008 developments are coming back online all over the nation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 8:36 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by texcolo View Post
Is that Roosevelt Avenue that goes under the post office?
Congress Parkway

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 10:12 PM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,518
They look a lot like Sears...boring...build the spire.
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2013, 10:38 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
N, N-Dimethyltryptamine
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: New Jersey - Somerset County
Posts: 29,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
They look a lot like Sears...boring...build the spire.
Build both . The sears look is what makes it look good. Its a taller looking Sears Tower and those thri antennas/spires are awesome
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2013, 8:59 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
Life enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Barcelona, NYC, California
Posts: 4,015
something tells me that a 2000 footer isn't likely but even any supertall or highrise coming out of this project is good.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2013, 2:17 AM
GeorgiaBoy24's Avatar
GeorgiaBoy24 GeorgiaBoy24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Murica
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
Build both . The sears look is what makes it look good. Its a taller looking Sears Tower and those thri antennas/spires are awesome
No offense but does Chicago need more antennas? Aren't Sears and Hancock enough? And also I would prefer a more unique design rather than just copying Sears.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:23 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.