HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Central Park Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #921  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2013, 8:03 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,903
Let's hope the deal gets done, and then I'll celebrate. We'll be celebrating a lot it seems. All of our focus on skyscrapers has led up to this.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #922  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2013, 6:28 PM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748






     
     
  #923  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2013, 10:48 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,903
This sleeping giant is ready to awaken.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #924  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 12:16 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
This sleeping giant is ready to awaken.
Funny thing is most won't even realize this is so massive and tall until its actually up. Exception of those who keep track with real estate and developments.Same thing with 432 park. Peoples heads will turn when they see all these super tall's rising.
     
     
  #925  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 12:31 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
Peoples heads will turn when they see all these super tall's rising.
I still expect most of the buzz about this building to center around the store opening. People love to shop, they won't care as much about the tower above because there won't be a deck up there, and so many towers are going up in a city that already has so many. Hopefully it will be a distinctive design that will help define the skyline, something people will know when they see it - be that on a t-shirt, post card, wherever.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #926  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 2:05 PM
Submariner's Avatar
Submariner Submariner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,341
Roughly, what are the dimensions of the site?
     
     
  #927  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 2:58 PM
tjp tjp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 429
I'm so interested to hear how to financing request from China turns out, given the craziness in their financial markets lately.

And ooh, question: is the design for this tower still in progress, or has it just not been released yet? It's hard to imagine they're asking a bank for $1bn without a few renderings..

Last edited by tjp; Jul 9, 2013 at 3:41 PM.
     
     
  #928  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 3:34 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,840
I'd be nice if this would turn out to resemble art-deco. A instant landmark in that location similar to GE Center.
     
     
  #929  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 5:03 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
I'd be nice if this would turn out to resemble art-deco. A instant landmark in that location similar to GE Center.
I certainly hope not. Most modern takes on Art Deco look poor simply because no one can afford the sort of detailing that made those older towers shine.

I'm hoping for something modern and sweeping like we are getting at Hudson Yards or Verre.
     
     
  #930  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 5:44 PM
JayPro JayPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,047
If it's gonna match 432P for sheer height and dominance of the north Midtown skyline, I'd like to see something..well..come to think of it..
Something that gives the illusion of slenderness given the large footprint it seems to have right now. Maybe a like two or three slender tubes connected at differing heights by short skywalks?
     
     
  #931  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2013, 9:46 PM
McSky's Avatar
McSky McSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
Roughly, what are the dimensions of the site?
The filing with the DOB said that the "lot area" was 90,915 sq feet, and that the "lot width" was 400 feet. The filing specified 1.2 million sq ft of "zoning area".
     
     
  #932  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2013, 1:00 AM
gttx's Avatar
gttx gttx is offline
Urban Explorer
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 2,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE View Post
I certainly hope not. Most modern takes on Art Deco look poor simply because no one can afford the sort of detailing that made those older towers shine.

I'm hoping for something modern and sweeping like we are getting at Hudson Yards or Verre.
Knowing the firm that is working on this project, I can say that we will be getting something like the latter...and certainly not art deco.
     
     
  #933  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2013, 1:07 AM
gttx's Avatar
gttx gttx is offline
Urban Explorer
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 2,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by JACKinBeantown View Post
The Fed offers loans to banks at ridiculously low rates so that they can then offer loans to people/corporations who need them. That's the problem with it. The banks can afford to finance a project like this... they just choose not to. Apparently that's not the way to make the most money even when given loans at rates much lower than average people or students can get. (and yes, this is on subject.)
A billion dollar spec super high-end residential building is a huge risk in any market. Even with cheap money, most banks wouldn't touch this for that reason alone. Just because banks can get easy cash doesn't mean they have the appetite for an expensive and risky project....and I highly doubt the intention of the Fed is to pump more money into speculative real estate.

As an aside, who cares that money is coming from China (if it actually happens, which I'd guess is unlikely given the recent banking news there)? American money helped build Chinese cities...why can't Chinese money build ours?
     
     
  #934  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2013, 1:33 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,903


This isn't about American money vs. Chinese money. Let's keep talking about the building please. You can continue your debate amongst yourselves (PM).

Another look at the building footprint...


__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #935  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2013, 3:08 AM
JayPro JayPro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Huntington, Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,047
Ooh...wouldn't it be neat to see a design element occupy that part of the footprint that sticks out by the tunnel?
I'm thinking along the lines of the William Donald Schaefer Building in Baltimore, but with more body on the slender extension and obviously taller.
     
     
  #936  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2013, 3:46 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
^That part of the footprint is a landmarked building, so it's going to be preserved. 1780 Broadway is part of the site to give extra air rights to the project and to give frontage on Broadway, but the actual tower won't be on that particular parcel.
     
     
  #937  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2013, 4:18 AM
Submariner's Avatar
Submariner Submariner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSky View Post
The filing with the DOB said that the "lot area" was 90,915 sq feet, and that the "lot width" was 400 feet. The filing specified 1.2 million sq ft of "zoning area".
Really? It looks a lot smaller than that...
     
     
  #938  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2013, 1:01 PM
McSky's Avatar
McSky McSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 156
It's possible that the 400-foot width figure refers to the widest distance between two points on the site, indicated by the blue arrow below. If the blue line is 400 feet long, the red line on the right side of the diagram would be 270 feet long.




Here is the filing. I put a red "X" at the bottom next to the indicated height of the building.

     
     
  #939  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2013, 6:25 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSky View Post
It's possible that the 400-foot width figure refers to the widest distance between two points on the site, indicated by the blue arrow below. If the blue line is 400 feet long, the red line on the right side of the diagram would be 270 feet long.
Manhattan blocks are only 200 ft wide.

The only way I can find a 400ft width is if I start at the corner of Broadway and 58th, and go all the way to the building east of the site. Perhaps this represents the extent of the zoning lot, as opposed to the actual construction site. We do know after all, that Extel purchased airrights from neighboring properties.

     
     
  #940  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2013, 2:10 AM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 8,847
Is anything actually happening on the site? The bricks seem to have been there a really long time.

By the way, Lee's Art Supply is a great store and you can probably get a good view into the lot from the upper floors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILNY View Post

__________________
Hi.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:54 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.