Quote:
Originally Posted by iamfishhead
Yeah, if you look at crime statistics, SF is safer than many other cities then you might think, at least in terms of assault and other violent crimes.
|
It's true that there are cities with more violent crime than SF. But the majority of US cities do better than SF, not worse.
Of the 100 largest US cities in 2017, SF had a higher total violent crime rate than 60 of them. Ranked just below Miami (another famously safe city, right?), and was worse-off than the following, in descending order:
San Antonio
Corpus Christi
St Petersburg
Denver
Sacramento
Reno
Des Moines
Boston
Long Beach
Pittsburgh
St. Paul
Omaha
Louisville
Seattle
Jacksonville
Spokane
Las Vegas
Aurora
Fresno
Fort Worth
Norfolk
New York
Colorado Springs
Arlington
Portland
Columbus
Jersey City
Riverside
Santa Ana
Glendale
Bakersfield
Tampa
Savannah
Chesapeake
Mesa
Austin
San Jose
El Paso
Madison
San Diego
Fort Wayne
Anaheim
Laredo
Lexington
Garland
Chula Vista
Boise
Chandler
Honolulu
Irving
Hialeah
Henderson
Fremont
Santa Clarita
Scottsdale
Plano
Virginia Beach
Gilbert
Irvine
SF is great, but it's funny to see the alternate reality that some people inhabit, where it's actually a super safe city with low violent crime by US standards. You're thinking of Honolulu or Boise. Not SF lol
Not to mention that safety changes depending on the person. A young latino or black person in SF is going to be much more in danger of a random assault (or even murder) than a typical white person. Just like someone who zips through a sketchy area on their bike (or by car) is far less likely to have trouble than a person who goes through on foot, or who actually lives there.
SF does rank relatively well for assault, murder and rape, and ranks worse than 30-35% of the 100 largest cities.
Robbery however is also a violent crime, and one that affects upper class people to a larger degree than assaults and murders. In fact the robbery rate is the main reason SF's total violent crime rate is relatively high. Just by robbery rate, SF was worse than 80% of the 100 largest cities. That's number 20 on the list, right in between Newark, NJ, and Washington DC. Worse than New Orleans, Dallas, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Atlanta, Nashville, Toledo, Pittsburgh, NYC, Jersey City, etc, etc. Does SF really sound particularly safe here, by American standards?
And as for property crime, in 2017 SF was the 2nd worst in the entire nation, fueled mostly by car break ins and bike thefts, which spiked greatly in recent years. Though they dropped back down due to covid-19, while burglaries then spiked.
By the way, shooting victims in SF are up 181% so far this year compared to 2020.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian
The thing, though, that makes Market scarier than the Tenderloin is the 2 BART stations, especially Civic Center. Those are where the Oakland drug dealers come to the surface from their trip under the Bay. That's why the biggest heroin markets are near there (and the 2 BART stations in the Mission are active too).
|
ahh yes, lets imply that Oakland is to blame for the worst crime. As if the Tenderloin and Mission districts (and other parts of SF) don't have lots of drug dealers living in them. Or perhaps the implication is that Oakland drug dealers are some kind of extra scary and dangerous breed of drug dealer lol