Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller
Interesting.
The old agreement with Four Seasons is described as a "lease" in news reports, so I guess that the new operator would likely be contracted under an operator or management contract rather than a lease... unless "treated like a retailer" means CF wanted a more traditional lease rather than a variable fee based on operating profits (or losses) under an operator or management contract?
https://www.timescolonist.com/busine...ispute-4661734
|
There was some talk before their last renewal that they would walk away because it was one of the few properties that they had "ownership" with the leasehold since they prefer to just be a hotel operator.
From their 1998 Annual Report
Quote:
The Corporation has been in discussions with the landlords of the Four Seasons Hotel Vancouver and The Pierre in New York since last 1994 to revise their respective lease structures to allocate major capital expenditures requirements, and in the case of Vancouver, property taxes, more equitably between the parties. To preserve its economic interest in the Vancouver leasehold, the Corporation gave notice to the landlord that it intends to renew the lease for the Four Seasons Hotel for a further 20-year period beginning in 2020. Discussions with the landlord relating to the realty taxes are continuing. The extended lease terms are generally consistent with the existing lease, which provides for a maximum lease payment of approprimately $2.2 million annually.
|
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/re...ls-and-resorts
I wonder what Holt, Microsoft or Apple paying annually to CF.. And some reports mention the property was losing a few million a year at certain points, not sure if that was just a one off...