HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2281  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 2:59 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
I suppose it might stop some people from moving to Florida.

Every time I hear my parents complain about the weather in Chicagoland and wish they were in the South, I wonder why Chicagoland is so bad for seniors. My grandparents always did okay without moving to Florida.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2282  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 4:28 AM
brian_b brian_b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Don't be ignorant.

It's time for the City of Chicago to get that casino. If it's going to cost $20 million a year to let seniors ride free, a city owned casino could plug that gap with revenue it takes in. And as you know from reading those articles, riding public transit would be free for seniors state wide. Blago is now thinking of future legislation to make public transit free for the disabled. Hell, if he's going this far, if we do get that casino, fares should be reduced to $1 for everyone else within 5 years of it opening.

Just my thoughts.
Meh. Casino revenues are dropping, even in Atlantic City and Las Vegas. I'm not against having one, but there is no reason to overpay for the license. The legislature is out of their mind with what they want for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2283  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 3:16 PM
Chicago3rd Chicago3rd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cranston, Rhode Island
Posts: 8,695
If you are furious about the transporation issue here in Illinois and other things check out this webpage.

http://impeachblago.com/index.html
__________________
All the photos "I" post are photos taken by me and can be found on my photo pages @ http://wilbsnodgrassiii.smugmug.com// UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED and CREDITED.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2284  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 3:32 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Every place (of any size) that free transit has been tried (remember Austin's grand experiment in the 80s?), the regular riders have begged to have fares reinstated, exactly because the buses became rolling homeless shelters and mental wards.
This is exactly right. Public transit should be affordable, not free.

Cities don't need free transit for seniors, or the disabled, and they certainly don't need free transit for everyone. They need quick, clean, efficient trains to bring people from outlying neighborhoods of the city to their downtown jobs, shopping and entertainment. Public transportation is necessary to continue the gentrification and revitalization of Chicago in particular. They should be using any excess revenue to improve the quality of service, rather than make the same bad service cheaper.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2285  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 3:34 PM
10023's Avatar
10023 10023 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 21,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by BorisMolotov View Post
The problems with this are, where do you draw the lines? And the rest of Illinois would shrivel up and die.
So?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2286  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 4:58 PM
Vertigo Vertigo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 220
One of the things that upsets me about this whole 'seniors ride free' sillyness is that in the end nothing is FREE. Someone always ends up paying for it. Politicians use these tactics though to show compassion and understanding towards people and unfortunately many people follow along. I've already heard several people say what a wonderful idea that this has been proposed.

I then respond 'Fine, do YOU want to pay more in taxes to subsidize this?'

This whole thing is especially ridiculous considering the amount of money that needs to be spent bringing the enitire system up to code so that seniors actually can use the service. Too many broken escalators, the entire Wabash leg of the loop needs to be rehabbed, dark dreary subway stations etc..

I'm not against the principle of seniors riding for free. I'm simply against this proposal at a time when so much more money is needed to modernize the current system.

Last edited by Vertigo; Jan 14, 2008 at 5:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2287  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 6:37 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,373
Quote:
Too many broken escalators,...
Too FEW escalators to begin with. When I was in Paris for the first time a few months ago, almost all of their elevated stations have escalators—nice ones too.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2288  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 6:49 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Too FEW escalators to begin with. When I was in Paris for the first time a few months ago, almost all of their elevated stations have escalators—nice ones too.
But do they have escalators like the one at North and Clybourn? I think not, that thing is fucking sweet, like 10 inches wide! Its skinny enough to force extremely overweight people to use the stairs!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2289  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 7:06 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,373
I encountered one that seemed to be about just under 2 feet wide. Thats true about North/Clybourn, fatties beware!
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2290  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2008, 11:03 PM
Chicago3rd Chicago3rd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Cranston, Rhode Island
Posts: 8,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
I encountered one that seemed to be about just under 2 feet wide. Thats true about North/Clybourn, fatties beware!
This fatty loves them because skinny asses cannot run past me on them.
(but I do stairs now so I don't get that joy any longer).
__________________
All the photos "I" post are photos taken by me and can be found on my photo pages @ http://wilbsnodgrassiii.smugmug.com// UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED and CREDITED.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2291  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2008, 2:06 AM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,617
Anyone happen to catch Chicago Tonight (well, tonight)? Dedicated the entire hour to the impending transit funding vote/crisis. Excellent piece. One of the points that stuck with me was how one of the guys talked about how London is pouring billions into expanding their transit, and how they view it as an investment. And yet we always look at it as a "subsidy".

I think this whole thing goes to show just how precarious Chicago's foothold is on the world stage. The last guy who they interviewed said it best: "Illinois without Chicago is Iowa."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2292  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2008, 2:14 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,373
The new thread under this one notes Vancouver transit getting a $14B dollar investment. How frightening in comparison.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2293  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2008, 2:32 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,480
Right. Here, transit gets a "bailout" while new roads and interchanges are economic investment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2294  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2008, 3:10 AM
jjk1103 jjk1103 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 878
..........I know the transit funding agreement is paramount, but.........I just have a couple of unrelated transit questions.......what's new with the Grand Ave (Red) station re-hab ? ........what's new with the Super-station ? ....how is the Brown Line progressing ? ....any news there? ...any word on any progress on the Circle Line ? or Red line extension ? ........these issues may have been discussed recently, but I'm too lazy to pour through all the "transit funding crap" to look for it ..........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2295  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2008, 7:34 PM
jephweiser's Avatar
jephweiser jephweiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjk1103 View Post
..........I know the transit funding agreement is paramount, but.........I just have a couple of unrelated transit questions.......what's new with the Grand Ave (Red) station re-hab ? ........what's new with the Super-station ? ....how is the Brown Line progressing ? ....any news there? ...any word on any progress on the Circle Line ? or Red line extension ? ........these issues may have been discussed recently, but I'm too lazy to pour through all the "transit funding crap" to look for it ..........
anyone?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2296  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2008, 8:12 PM
Taft Taft is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 638
Just when I think Blago can't be any dumber:

Blagojevich to skeptical seniors: 'Hold your nose and take a bus for free'

http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/...jevich-to.html

Taft
__________________
We are building a religion, we are making it bigger.
We are widening the corridor and adding more lanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2297  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2008, 11:03 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjk1103 View Post
..........I know the transit funding agreement is paramount, but.........I just have a couple of unrelated transit questions.......what's new with the Grand Ave (Red) station re-hab ? ........what's new with the Super-station ? ....how is the Brown Line progressing ? ....any news there? ...any word on any progress on the Circle Line ? or Red line extension ? ........these issues may have been discussed recently, but I'm too lazy to pour through all the "transit funding crap" to look for it ..........
Basic work for the Grand Avenue rehab has started. Go to CDOT's website to read more.

According to CTA's website, the Brown Line project is 65% done.

No word on Circle Line, Red Line extension, etc.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2298  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2008, 4:26 AM
jjk1103 jjk1103 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Basic work for the Grand Avenue rehab has started. Go to CDOT's website to read more.

According to CTA's website, the Brown Line project is 65% done.

No word on Circle Line, Red Line extension, etc.
........thank you !!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2299  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 8:39 PM
j korzeniowski's Avatar
j korzeniowski j korzeniowski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: logan square, chicago
Posts: 525
House passes mass-transit bill with free rides for seniors

Link, Chicago Tribune
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2300  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2008, 8:57 PM
pip's Avatar
pip pip is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,243
!!


About damn time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.