HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9781  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2020, 3:38 AM
ciweiss ciweiss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 270
A great updated video tour of Tempe. For those out of town it highlights some of Tempes recent developments. From Sept 2020

https://youtu.be/1UQjlkEeffY
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9782  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2020, 7:21 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,398
Not sure if anyone has read this yet. Tempe axed the Urban Core Master Plan.

Quote:
Tempe scraps plan that would have guided downtown development
Paulina Pineda - Arizona Republic

A three-pronged plan that would have guided development in Tempe’s downtown core over the next 20 years was scrapped Thursday, after nearly three years of work.

The Urban Core Master Plan, as it was called, would have provided building and design guidelines for development across approximately 6 square miles bounded by Loop 202 in the north, Union Pacific Railroad tracks in the south, Hardy Drive in the west and Loop 101 in the east.

Two related items, the Urban Code District, which would have updated land-use regulations and building design standards along public transit routes, and the Development Bonus Program, an initiative that would have allowed developers to build taller buildings in exchange for the creation of affordable housing or preservation of historic properties, also were tabled.

The move comes a year after the plan was first brought to the City Council. City staff had asked for more time after the October 2019 meeting to continue gathering community feedback, and then the new coronavirus pandemic struck.

The Urban Core Master Plan was a hard sell from the beginning.

Residents and historic preservationists feared urbanization would creep into the surrounding neighborhood, damage the area’s character and threaten historic buildings. Some developers thought the plan created too many hoops.

Even Mayor Corey Woods said during a candidate forum in February, before being elected, that he wanted to start over after hearing the community's concerns.

Without consensus around the plan — and as priorities shift to the health crisis and other issues — city staffers asked to withdraw the Urban Core Master Plan from Thursday’s City Council meeting agenda, said Kris Baxter-Ging, a city spokesperson.

“It was important for us to have our community vision be well accepted by the majority of people in the community and there really truly wasn’t a consensus in either direction,” Baxter-Ging said.

Proposed projects will continue moving through the development process as they currently do but this could mean the city will have less say on where and how growth occurs.

Staff plans to work on a leaner version of the Urban Core Master Plan that will be presented to residents and the council at a later time. There is no timeline for when that will be completed.

What would the plan have done?

High-rise developments have been a growing trend in Tempe, but the Urban Core Master Plan would have made it the norm — and put rules around it.

Until 2007, the grain elevator and silos of the Hayden Flour Mill stood as the city's tallest buildings.

Today, the West Sixth apartment towers downtown hold that record soaring 22 and 30 stories high.

About a dozen buildings in north Tempe are taller than 15 stories, and more are under construction.

Landlocked Tempe has become increasingly urban as it approaches build-out. The population in the city center is expected to double to 90,000 people by 2040 as the city attracts high-wage jobs and the student population at Arizona State University grows.

But that development burst has left city planners grappling with how to grow responsibly.

They say the city can’t prevent growth so it must plan for it.

The plan would've provided guidelines for how tall and dense developers could build and where that type of construction would be most appropriate in north Tempe.

It called for stricter design guidelines and sought to promote sustainable developments, use of multi-modal transportation, walking and more street-level commercial space.

Plan was a hard sell

City staff held more than 30 public meetings and dozens of focus groups with neighborhood leaders, businesses and property owners. They sent more than 213,000 postcards and 30,000 emails.

Still, the community couldn’t come together around the project after about two years of trying.

Some residents felt detached from the planning process, thought the plan was too cumbersome and not easily digestible.

Others thought the plan would allow new development to encroach on established neighborhoods and they pushed for growth to be spread to underdeveloped parts of the city, such as north of Loop 202. They feared larger projects would exacerbate Tempe’s affordable housing crisis that has been partially spurred by the disappearance of garden-style apartments in favor of luxury condos and high rises.

The plan would have required a major general plan amendment because it proposed new densities and land uses, which the council would have had to approve, but some residents thought such large-scale changes should have gone to voters as part of the next general plan. The general plan, which voters last approved in 2014, is a long-range blueprint for how the city wants to grow over the next 30 years and is ratified by voters every 10 years.

Developers also had concerns.

Some weren’t happy with the stricter design guidelines they would have to follow to build bigger projects. Others felt the plan added red tape and could make it harder to get projects approved.

The mayor said it can be challenging to get support for a proposal of this magnitude. People may favor some parts but could be hesitant to support the plan as a whole if they’re uneasy about any portion of it, he said.

That’s what happened with the Urban Core Master Plan, he said.

He told The Arizona Republic on Thursday that he thought it was the right move to “pump the brakes” on the plan.

“When you’re talking about planning for the future of development of the downtown area for the next 15 to 20 years, I think you need to have people come together around the idea,” he said.

What this means for development

Tabling the plan likely won’t hinder development in north Tempe, Baxter-Ging said.

Projects will move through the development process as they do now and continue to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Developers will be able to achieve the same heights and densities proposed under the plan by seeking variances or submitting a planned area development, or PAD, which must be approved by council, like they do now.

However, this could make it more difficult for the city to predict where and how growth will happen, Chad Weaver, Tempe’s Community Development Director, previously told The Republic. Some of the design improvements the plan called for won’t be implemented and the city will have fewer tools available to encourage affordable housing and historic preservation, he said.

Woods said the city will continue to promote affordable housing, multi-modal transportation and sustainability even without some of those tools because they are priorities for the city.

Baxter-Ging said the planning effort wasn't fruitless as staffers will use some of the collected data and feedback they got for future plans.

The Affordable Housing Strategy, which was approved last summer and creates incentives for developers to provide affordable housing and sets up a mechanism to analyze the impact of new projects on the city’s housing inventory, grew out of the Urban Core Master Plan.

Parts of the plan where there was consensus can be brought forward as separate measures, too, she said.

One example is the Smith Industrial Innovation Hub near the Loop 101 and 202 interchange on Tempe’s east side. The council on Thursday voted on a general plan amendment that would allow more density and a broader mix of development in the 302-acre employment corridor as well as development guidelines, which were taken from the Urban Core Master Plan.

Reach reporter Paulina Pineda at paulina.pineda@azcentral.com or 480-389-9637. Follow her on Twitter: @paulinapineda22.
Source: https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...us/3643298001/
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9783  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2020, 4:28 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,234
They are clearing the lot slated for the 'Vib' hotel this morning (5th St. just west of the railroad tracks). Between that and it being in review for a building permit per the Tempe Development Map, this one should start soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9784  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2020, 9:09 PM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,297
Isn't the Beam suppose to be starting soon too across the street? The lot has been closed for a while.

Also I noticed just west on 5th there is a lot that is being developed. Not sure if its apartments or townhouses? Last time I was by there they were pouring slabs?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9785  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2020, 9:03 AM
Obadno Obadno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by skiesthelimit View Post
*WARNING PICTURE HEAVY*

Before I begin with today's update, enjoy these pics from the top of Watermark's parking garage I took last week (not sure if I was actually supposed to be up there lol) and one of the street car stations on Mill:



Here's a couple updates around the Novus/Apache area from earlier this morning (10/13/20):

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9786  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2020, 2:39 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,234
Here is the full DRC packet for the Tempe Depot development that is going before the commission tonight:

https://www.tempe.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=85989

A few notes:
  • Hotel would be a flagship Hilton
  • Train station would be retail/restaurant/bar, but Tempe planners did request some design changes to make the station better suited for future commuter rail if it ever materializes
  • Finishes would be mostly glass/metal/concrete/masonry, but looks like some EIFS on the hotel
  • Still a little galling that they have ~50% more parking than the zoning requires, especially as they make a big deal about this being perhaps the most public-transit-accessible development in the Valley. But it looks like they already actually eliminated some parking at the request of the planners, and between the weird site, and coordinating the many government entities for approvals (Valley Metro, FTA, Bureau of Reclamation), I'm sure it's a monumentally hard project to make work. So overall I hope it gets built.

Last edited by muertecaza; Oct 27, 2020 at 4:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9787  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2020, 9:22 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
Here is the full DRC packet for the Tempe Depot development that is going before the commission tonight:

https://www.tempe.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=85989

A few notes:
  • Hotel would be a flagship Hilton
  • Train station would be retail/restaurant/bar, but Tempe planners did request some design changes to make the station better suited for future commuter rail if it ever materializes
  • Finishes would be mostly glass/metal/concrete/masonry, but looks like some EIFS on the hotel
  • Still a little galling that they have ~50% more parking than the zoning requires, especially as they make a big deal about this being perhaps the most public-transit-accessible development in the Valley. But it looks like they already actually eliminated some parking at the request of the planners, and between the weird site, and coordinating the many government entities for approvals (Valley Metro, FTA, Bureau of Reclamation), I'm sure it's a monumentally hard project to make work. So overall I hope it gets built.
Nice to get a flagship Hilton. We need one in downtown Phoenix. That hotel tower is still absolutely hideous though. Looks like something from the 90s. The ugly brick color ughhh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9788  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 3:43 PM
Mr.RE Mr.RE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 751
Both Tempe Depot and Banyan North Tempe were recommended Approval to City council. Next up is the 3-story Uhaul facility north of Watermark. I'm happy that is getting redeveloped.

EDIT: Tempe market station apartments (dirt lot across tempe marketplace) is going for approval at City council tonight. I hope to see that get going soon. That lot is an eyesore!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9789  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 3:50 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.RE View Post
Both Tempe Depot and Banyan North Tempe were recommended Approval to City council. Next up is the 3-story Uhaul facility north of Watermark. I'm happy that is getting redeveloped.

EDIT: Tempe market station apartments (dirt lot across tempe marketplace) is going for approval at City council tonight. I hope to see that get going soon. That lot is an eyesore!
Thanks for the updates!

What's the plan for the UHaul Facility?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9790  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 4:05 PM
Mr.RE Mr.RE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU Diablo View Post
Thanks for the updates!

What's the plan for the UHaul Facility?
Demo existing site, build a roughly 100k SF conditioned 3 story facility up to 38 ft in height . Definitely will be an upgrade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9791  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 8:01 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.RE View Post
Demo existing site, build a roughly 100k SF conditioned 3 story facility up to 38 ft in height . Definitely will be an upgrade.
Gross. Would've been smart to sell the land and buy land somwhere cheaper for this garbage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9792  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 8:17 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHXFlyer11 View Post
Gross. Would've been smart to sell the land and buy land somwhere cheaper for this garbage.
LOL yep
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9793  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 8:40 PM
Mr.RE Mr.RE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHXFlyer11 View Post
Gross. Would've been smart to sell the land and buy land somwhere cheaper for this garbage.
As someone who has developed class A storage facilities in my day, I can say this will be a better type of "Garbage" than the current single story, drive ups with ugly orange roll up doors. Improvement in my book.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9794  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 9:51 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.RE View Post
As someone who has developed class A storage facilities in my day, I can say this will be a better type of "Garbage" than the current single story, drive ups with ugly orange roll up doors. Improvement in my book.
I think what's being implied here is that a mixed-use project with height and retail/multi-family would've been better here than a self-service storage project, no matter how fancy or good looking the climate-controlled U-Haul building is lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9795  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 10:43 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU Diablo View Post
I think what's being implied here is that a mixed-use project with height and retail/multi-family would've been better here than a self-service storage project, no matter how fancy or good looking the climate-controlled U-Haul building is lol
Exactly. There is only so much space along the lake. Sadly the city settled for some lesser height projects back 10 years ago, the Uhaul and Best Western would've been prime for redevelopment and adding some height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9796  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2020, 4:18 AM
CBar CBar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 45
https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/...empe-site.html

"The developer behind Block 23 and CityScape in downtown Phoenix is planning the redevelopment of the Macayo’s Depot Cantina in Tempe, to include two towers and what may be the first Valley building to act as a bridge over light rail tracks.

Phoenix-based Red Development is planning to build a 17-story office tower totaling 319,000 square feet on the northern portion of the 2.5-acre site near Third Street and Ash Avenue, which is bisected by the light rail tracks, according to plans submitted to the city of Tempe. Plans call for constructing the two towers around and over the light rail tracks, creating a space where the train will travel through the buildings. ..."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9797  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2020, 6:17 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,234
Looks like the owner of the First Congregational Church in DT Tempe (https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4237...7i13312!8i6656) is starting the process of redevelopment by requesting a demo permit:

https://www.tempe.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=86241

The current iteration of the church was built in the 1940s/50s, although there have been buildings from the same congregation at that site back to the 1890s. The church is on Tempe's historic register, but not the national register.

https://www.tempe.gov/Home/Component...780?selcat=335

I personally would be ok losing the church, I do not view it as irreplaceably historically meaningful. But I will be interested to see what the proposal is, and how much opposition there is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9798  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2020, 6:37 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,234
Big update to the Joint Review Committee on Novus, with a bunch of nice looking construction updates, individual renderings, and projected buildout renderings.

https://www.tempe.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=86231

Going to post them all behind spoiler tags, as there are a lot:

Construction Updates

ISTB 7:


Athletics Village:


Becton Dickinson/IDEA:


Hyatt House:


Parking Garage:


Aspen House:


Individual Renderings

Low-rise Office:


Micro Units by Hyatt House:


Multi-Use Arena:


Rural/University Office:



Full Build Out Projected Renderings





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9799  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2020, 11:03 PM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
Holy sh*t that looks incredible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9800  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2020, 2:08 AM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASUSunDevil View Post
Holy sh*t that looks incredible.
I concur!
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.