HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2019, 8:39 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ I take your point. But what's in it for them by spending money to carve up the mall and re-open the streets? Frankly I think that would be great for downtown, but I just wonder what would motivate them to do that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2019, 8:41 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 7,985
They won't be streets again, but from the outside it will resemble three distinct buildings.

Again, educated guess. Who knows how it will end up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2019, 10:06 PM
robertocarlos robertocarlos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 820
They could rebuild it like the RBC Convention Centre and have the streets run through the building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2019, 10:21 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 5,468
It will probably resemble more of a couple pedestrian arcades connecting the south end of the property to the north.
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - March 2024

Winnipeg | A Picture Thread - Updated October 2023

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 12:23 AM
Bdog's Avatar
Bdog Bdog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by wardlow View Post
It's so frustrating that there doesn't seem to be any room in the greater public dialogue for this kind of nuanced, reasonable perspective on downtown safety. It's almost always a binary choice between 'Downtown is a dangerous cesspoool and its a wonder we're not all murdered' and 'Downtown safety issues are just, like, your perception, man'.
Definitely. On this forum anyway, people seem to use one extreme or the other to make their argument. It reminds me of last fall, during the Open P&M debate.

Urbanist in March of last year: "I've never had a single issue downtown. I work downtown and walk around in the evening. None of my friends or I have ever felt unsafe. Only suburban folk perceive downtown as unsafe, due to classism."

Same Urbanist in September last year: "The Portage and Main underground is SO dangerous. I know 4 people who were yelled at and assaulted down there in the last month alone. It's only a matter of time before someone faces serious violence in that scary concourse!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 3:37 AM
davequanbury davequanbury is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 181
Sure, it would be optimal if Starlite improved the mal, built the towers, opened the stores to the sidewalk, but what if they just grab the profits from the parking and let the property coast/decay further?

Parking is going to remain a commodity downtown (as are sketchy-looking people, panhandlers, suburbanites, urbanites, lefties and conservatives).

If the profit comes from the parking portion of the property without capital investment, there’s a solid chance they don’t do anything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 3:52 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 5,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by davequanbury View Post
Sure, it would be optimal if Starlite improved the mal, built the towers, opened the stores to the sidewalk, but what if they just grab the profits from the parking and let the property coast/decay further?

Parking is going to remain a commodity downtown (as are sketchy-looking people, panhandlers, suburbanites, urbanites, lefties and conservatives).

If the profit comes from the parking portion of the property without capital investment, there’s a solid chance they don’t do anything.
That seems unlikely as their business model has been to purchase under performing properties and reinvest in them. But anything is possible only time will tell.
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - March 2024

Winnipeg | A Picture Thread - Updated October 2023

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 4:28 AM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is online now
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdog View Post
Definitely. On this forum anyway, people seem to use one extreme or the other to make their argument. It reminds me of last fall, during the Open P&M debate.

Urbanist in March of last year: "I've never had a single issue downtown. I work downtown and walk around in the evening. None of my friends or I have ever felt unsafe. Only suburban folk perceive downtown as unsafe, due to classism."

Same Urbanist in September last year: "The Portage and Main underground is SO dangerous. I know 4 people who were yelled at and assaulted down there in the last month alone. It's only a matter of time before someone faces serious violence in that scary concourse!"
Ok but just because a very small portion of downtown is unsafe (the concourse) does not mean the downtown as a whole is unsafe.

Your two premises here don't necessarily have to be mutually exclusive.
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 1:14 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy View Post
It will probably resemble more of a couple pedestrian arcades connecting the south end of the property to the north.
That would be a pretty good move IMO. Maintain at least some public space even if they move in the direction of sealing off most of the complex. That would probably effectively 'right size' the mall as the handful of thriving businesses could cluster around those arcade areas with the rest of the space turned into something else.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davequanbury View Post
Sure, it would be optimal if Starlite improved the mal, built the towers, opened the stores to the sidewalk, but what if they just grab the profits from the parking and let the property coast/decay further?

Parking is going to remain a commodity downtown (as are sketchy-looking people, panhandlers, suburbanites, urbanites, lefties and conservatives).

If the profit comes from the parking portion of the property without capital investment, there’s a solid chance they don’t do anything.
Sounds like a possibility. And that isn't to say that Starlight isn't entering into this with the best of intentions. It's just that if the ambitious redevelopment plans don't add up, well, you can still keep raking it in from the parkade until a real redevelopment play materializes, while effectively doing nothing with the above-ground part of the place. Basically a repeat of the Winnipeg Square scenario.

That would be dreadful if it happened, though... I hope FNP and the levels of government have done their homework to prevent that type of scenario from playing out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 2:21 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post

I hope FNP and the levels of government have done their homework to prevent that type of scenario from playing out.
While some of the potential negative outcomes discussed here are possible, I believe the stakeholders involved here have a great deal more information about the buyers and their plans than many, if not all, of us do (with the exception of Biff, who seems to know everything!). It's difficult to predict success or failure of the project from the sidelines.

With that in mind, I think the development agencies involved have learned a great deal about what works and what doesn't since PP was first built. Having such a huge interest in seeing the Portage Place "misjudgement" corrected, I doubt they would settle for vague promises from any potential developer of PP. My (uneducated) guess is that the stakeholders have seen a pretty sting commitment from the developers in what they, at least minimally, plan to do, and that it's an improvement over the status quo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 2:28 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by pspeid View Post
While some of the potential negative outcomes discussed here are possible, I believe the stakeholders involved here have a great deal more information about the buyers and their plans than many, if not all, of us do (with the exception of Biff, who seems to know everything!). It's difficult to predict success or failure of the project from the sidelines.

With that in mind, I think the development agencies involved have learned a great deal about what works and what doesn't since PP was first built. Having such a huge interest in seeing the Portage Place "misjudgement" corrected, I doubt they would settle for vague promises from any potential developer of PP. My (uneducated) guess is that the stakeholders have seen a pretty sting commitment from the developers in what they, at least minimally, plan to do, and that it's an improvement over the status quo.
In all fairness, is it possible to do anything that isn't an improvement over the status quo? That mall hasn't been updated since it was opened 30 years ago. They replace floor tiles with mismatched ones. They run the escalators backwards to every other place on the continent. I get that it was a failure of a mall from day one, but I honestly think poor management has brought it down to the level it is today. Even ten or 15 years ago it was a better mall and I'd say downtown was less vibrant then.
__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 2:49 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
In all fairness, is it possible to do anything that isn't an improvement over the status quo? That mall hasn't been updated since it was opened 30 years ago. They replace floor tiles with mismatched ones. They run the escalators backwards to every other place on the continent. I get that it was a failure of a mall from day one, but I honestly think poor management has brought it down to the level it is today. Even ten or 15 years ago it was a better mall and I'd say downtown was less vibrant then.
I have been going to Portage Place pretty regularly since it opened in 1987. Admittedly I was pretty young for the first few years so I don't remember many details from the first few years, but it seems to break down into three phases.

1987-1998 - PP as normal regional mall with The Bay and Eaton's as de facto anchors

(Eaton's closes)

1999-2009 - PP as neighbourhood shopping centre with The Bay as de facto anchor

(Several major stores close including Holt Renfrew, McNally Robinson, Club Monaco, Marks & Spencer, Sports Experts, the cinemas close)

2010 - present - PP as distressed asset where you go to buy cheap cell phone cases and deep discount clothing in the few remaining stores that haven't become office space


Bottom line, it feels like the landlord pretty well gave up on the place about 10 years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 3:49 PM
GarryEllice's Avatar
GarryEllice GarryEllice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
They run the escalators backwards to every other place on the continent.
Oh gee, better tear the place down then!
(Seriously though, I don't see how this is an issue at all. Presumably they have some motivation for running them in that way.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 4:02 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,704
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I have been going to Portage Place pretty regularly since it opened in 1987. Admittedly I was pretty young for the first few years so I don't remember many details from the first few years, but it seems to break down into three phases.

1987-1998 - PP as normal regional mall with The Bay and Eaton's as de facto anchors

(Eaton's closes)

1999-2009 - PP as neighbourhood shopping centre with The Bay as de facto anchor

(Several major stores close including Holt Renfrew, McNally Robinson, Club Monaco, Marks & Spencer, Sports Experts, the cinemas close)

2010 - present - PP as distressed asset where you go to buy cheap cell phone cases and deep discount clothing in the few remaining stores that haven't become office space


Bottom line, it feels like the landlord pretty well gave up on the place about 10 years ago.
Yes, it's basically a mall with no anchor stores to speak of (the mostly-empty Bay store can't, IMO, be considered much of an "anchor" any more). Without the through-traffic of Eaton's and The Bay, I don't think any revitalization of PP strictly as a "mall" will be much of a success. Like most folks, I expect to see some retail preserved (Staples, Shoppers) some services (restaurants, dental offices, etc.) then a mix of office and residential.

Now for the conjecture! I could see the Edmonton Kennedy courts demolished at ground level, with ground-level pedestrian access and sight-lines to The Promenade and sky-walks on the second level. Portage Ave access to remaining ground-level retail, with individual stores facades. office/residential towers on the pads at either end. Oh, and a bookstore....please!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 4:51 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,708
Crikey, that was interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 5:10 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryEllice View Post
Oh gee, better tear the place down then!
(Seriously though, I don't see how this is an issue at all. Presumably they have some motivation for running them in that way.)
Someone once posted on here that the owners were into Feng Shui. I don't know how many countless times I've seen people about to go down the escalators towards Staples and enter on the right side and are greeted by an up escalator. Same thing with the ones going from the main floor to the second floor to the rhird floor. You go up to get to the second floor. Then instead of the escalator that's right there taking you up further, you have to walk across the floor to get to the other one. It's nonsensical.

It's not a big deal, but it's weird.
__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 6:15 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is online now
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,843
There's an article about the sale being officially approved on CBC https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...sold-1.5265514 but it doesn't really give any specifics. Aren't we still waiting for Feds' approval?
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 6:20 PM
GarryEllice's Avatar
GarryEllice GarryEllice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
There's an article about the sale being officially approved on CBC https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...sold-1.5265514 but it doesn't really give any specifics. Aren't we still waiting for Feds' approval?
No, the feds have approved it now.
https://winnipegsun.com/news/news-ne...al-of-approval
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 6:25 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is online now
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarryEllice View Post
Thanks for confirming. Maybe I missed it because I'm just not keeping on top of things as well as I ought to.
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 6:25 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 5,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
There's an article about the sale being officially approved on CBC https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...sold-1.5265514 but it doesn't really give any specifics. Aren't we still waiting for Feds' approval?
It says right in the CBC article you posted “All three levels of government have signed off on the sale to Toronto-based Starlight Investments“.

starlight is now in a 60 day due diligence phase, we’ll hear more after that. The only reason this sale has gone public was due to the public assets involved. Normally a sale and development of this magnitude would not be publicly released until’s virtually shovel ready. Plans are still being developed behind the scenes, these things take time to materialize.
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - March 2024

Winnipeg | A Picture Thread - Updated October 2023

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.