Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6
If I were a Manitoba taxpayer I'd want to know a lot more about what's going on here and specifically what short or long-term commitments and price guarantees have been made with respect to wind power, which is generally very expensive, at a time of falling energy prices. I'd also like to know why Hydro is going after wind power when it already produces large amounts of hydro power that is relatively clean as well -- would building these huge turbine fields from scratch actually be less environmentally harmful than some sort of incremental increase in hydro production up north? Why are they pursuing additional capacity at all? Maybe there are excellent and satisfactory answers to these questions -- I have no idea, but I doubt that they'll even be asked by Manitoba's dimwit media, other than the Black Rod of course.
|
You mean Manitoba Hydro ratepayers? I don't think any taxpayer money ever has gone into these projects. Taxpayers don't subsidize ratepayers - its the other way around.
If you think northern hydro projects are 'relatively clean' then you haven't talked to the people they've affected or seen the landscape permanently altered firsthand. I'm no engineer but I've never heard of any 'incremental increase' being possible. Why are we pursuing additional capacity? I guess to make more money. Or should we just be satisfied with the status quo? Even if overall demand was flat, wouldn't we still want to produce more green energy if it means less carbon-generated electricity?
Regarding dead bats:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRqu4WiLQfk
Bats seem to die without impact, while birds die due to impact with turbine blades. Can't find the CBC clip but it was on the news about two months back.