HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


    Old Post Office Redevelopment Tower [1] in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #301  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2014, 9:21 PM
S.D.city's Avatar
S.D.city S.D.city is offline
Legos,Buildings,Drawing
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego Linda Vista
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
you don't have to "hope" for anything.

for like the 1,000th time now, this isn't a serious proposal.

all of the images displayed in this thread are visionary/placeholder/design exercise kinda stuff.
Sorry did read through the whole thread, I feel dumb
__________________
Drawing,Legos,Buildings a perfect world
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #302  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 2:47 AM
guesswho guesswho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 215
Has anyone been in the area around the Post Office recently? If yes, is there any sign of life at all in the building, or it is completely vacant? Something like 2.4MM sq feet right?

I just ask because the project showed up again in Crain's "construction bid" area this week (along with 1 S. Halsted for the umpteenth time with no dirt moved yet)......and was curious if there were any "official" looking people touring/measuring/doing anything that would signify that Davies was moving forward with rehabbing the building (I agree that the other towers including the 2,000 footer are a vision only).

It just kills me to drive into the city via 290 and see this hulking 1900's building completely devoid of any life in the second largest business district in the country.

I know Ikea chose this as one of two options in 2000 for a city store (250k sq feet I think, crazy to think that Ikea would only fill ~10% of the building). But that was, what, two recessions ago? A lot has changed since then (i.e. new Bolingbrook IKEA opening, St. Louis IKEA future opening, and Schaumburg IKEA expanding).

Is it better to wait around for a mixed use project to follow through, than a low density project like a mega-data center (just throwing that out there, I have no idea the cost to refit a 1900's building into a 2010's data center), but the City has seem intent on growing data centers lately.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #303  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 2:58 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,419
^No word
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #304  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 3:00 AM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,372
In the General Developments thread, Skyguy mentioned this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
I noticed last night that a barge-crane is in place between Congress and Harrison, on the Post Office [west] side of the river. Does anyone have any idea as to why?
I've been wanting to head over to the site to see what, if any activity is going on but I've been busy recently and it's a bit out of the way from where Payton is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #305  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 4:10 AM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
^^^ Yeah that's an interesting coincidence. Wonder if Davies isn't going to surprise us in some manner. It could also just be work the city is forcing them to do to stay in code compliance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #306  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 12:52 PM
guesswho guesswho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
^^^ Yeah that's an interesting coincidence. Wonder if Davies isn't going to surprise us in some manner. It could also just be work the city is forcing them to do to stay in code compliance.
That's what I was thinking. I can't imagine the cost to keep the place up....millions per year? Why would he buy something like this just to let it sit fallow for years and years, while he tags up multi-million dollar bills (assuming he is paying them actually)......makes little sense....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #307  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 1:08 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
zI know this isn't a legit proposal but this doesn't look that bad
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #308  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 1:28 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657


Phase 1 actually looked to be much more realized, as far as renderings go. Remember talk about it starting in September 2013? Man if the Spire goes, this is next on my wish list. Rehab of an Art-Deco gem, 900' mixed-use plus a Casino. If I were da Mayor, I'd throw in 100% worth of TIF.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #309  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 2:53 PM
rgolch's Avatar
rgolch rgolch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 887
Well, at least one thing that mock up shows is that its a pretty good location for a significant office tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #310  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 3:16 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,780
I imagine any project on this site is going to take quite a bit more time to design and implement than most. There are a ton of complicated design problems with this site. It's next to the river, over the metra lines, over the blue line, 290 runs through the center, and it would include modifications to a historic building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #311  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 4:02 PM
wierdaaron's Avatar
wierdaaron wierdaaron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,011
I can see the top of a barge crane from my apartment, but it doesn't appear to have moved an inch all week. Staging, maybe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #312  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 4:12 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
^ I thought perhaps it was staging for the Riverwalk project, but why would they erect it there? If it were on it's way to the riverwalk, I'd assume they'd just leave it laying flat. Harry please help.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #313  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 4:16 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,286
Any bridges scheduled to be overhauled in the area?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #314  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 4:16 PM
UPChicago's Avatar
UPChicago UPChicago is offline
Vote for me for Mayor!
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 800
Honestly I think the site would be more attractive with the demolition of the old post office.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #315  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 4:43 PM
BB 1871 BB 1871 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
^ I thought perhaps it was staging for the Riverwalk project, but why would they erect it there? If it were on it's way to the riverwalk, I'd assume they'd just leave it laying flat. Harry please help.
Could it be waiting to move to Wolf Point or would Hines float the barge crane at River Point across the confluence now that they're moving onto the tower portion of that project?

Wherever it's going, maybe they're waiting for St. Patty's to be over so they're not further clogging up the main branch/confluence for all the tour boats
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #316  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 5:43 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is online now
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506


Looks rather like the base of Trump along the river walk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #317  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 9:02 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by BB 1871 View Post
Could it be waiting to move to Wolf Point or would Hines float the barge crane at River Point across the confluence now that they're moving onto the tower portion of that project?

Wherever it's going, maybe they're waiting for St. Patty's to be over so they're not further clogging up the main branch/confluence for all the tour boats
Maybe, but that doesn't explain the timing of the recent work bids showing up. I'll be curious to see what the barge starts doing if anything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #318  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 9:21 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by UPChicago View Post
Honestly I think the site would be more attractive with the demolition of the old post office.
Ya the old post office is kinf of a buzz kill, with all the other modern buildings in the project
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #319  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 9:31 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,571
^ We got plenty of empty lots for modern buildings to go on. We only have one massive art-deco behemoth spanning over a major gateway into downtown. Demolishing it just to make the site easier to work with is just being lazy. A good architect knows how to use an irregular lot to his advantage, and integrate the old with the new in a way that brings out the best of both designs.

I would like to see the Old Post Office saved, considering its of major historical importance (reflected with its designation on the National Register of Historic Places). Now, whether that means remodeling it as it is, partially demolishing it as part of a larger plan, or integrating it into a larger redevelopment plan is entirely up to the developer and the economics of such a plan.

Remember, once its gone, its gone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #320  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2014, 9:34 PM
intrepidDesign's Avatar
intrepidDesign intrepidDesign is offline
Windy City Dan
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 494
^ 1000 times yes. Demolishing the Post Office is NOT an option.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.