Quote:
Originally Posted by TempleGuy1000
This is a pretty big misunderstanding of who runs the state legislator and who gets 'favorable' treatment. Rural county politicians rule Pennsylvania. PA is a state governed by landmass and not people. Hence why the GOP has held the majority in Harrisburg for a generation even though the Democrats have far more registered voters. SEPA is the democrat stronghold of the state, and democrats pass essentially nothing in Harrisburg:

|
I totally get the bullshit political situation in PA. I am certainly not on the rural Republican politicians' side. I fully agree, but bringing this up is kind of a non-sequitur.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempleGuy1000
And to be clear, this conversation started with you stating:
|
I'd argue that it started with you echoing the notion:
"Well SE PA subsidizes the rest of the state..."
You really think that you're
subsidizing me in Pittsburgh or other cities/counties that produce sizable GDPs? County operating budgets with state and federal funding components aren't the end all and be all of the economy, or something. And those state and federal allocations aren't even the largest pieces of the funding pie for most rural counties anyway (though they are in Chester County...). The fact is, that we all "subsidize" each other in one form or another within the state.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempleGuy1000
To act like Philadelphia (and it's suburbs that only exist because of the city) are a 'drag' on the state is absurd and untrue.
|
I never claimed that they were a drag on the rest of the state. I said that Philadelphia (with its orders of magnitude greater size than anywhere else in the state and 25% poverty rate) is subsidized far more heavily than anywhere else (and I asserted a few times that it should receive even more), and that Philadelphia is more of a drain on its wealthy suburban counties than anywhere else in the state is a drain on them. That's simple numbers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempleGuy1000
|
I don't support this one bit. Just like I don't support people complaining about higher tolls on the turnpike for using the most-traveled sections.
To be clear, I am not someone who complains about SE PA "getting everything". The greater share you put in, the greater share you should get out. It makes total sense to me that the most populated areas should get more... even when they don't contribute anywhere near their proportional share (like Philadelphia).