Quote:
Originally Posted by PhxSprawler
In March, it was four stories with 300 to 375 units, now they seem firm on 4-stories and 368 units. That is a significant lost opportunity to fill in the skyline hole between the Dial Soap building and downtown.
|
I feel bad for all of the people who contribute to the myriad of plans put together that put on the ruse that the City actually cares about how it's planned and developed, especially along the light rail, and ESPECIALLY adjacent to stops. Why do they bother putting these plans together when perhaps the most prominent vacant lot in the city, adjacent to a light rail stop and cultural amenities that make up what they wish to become the "midtown museum districit," is allowed to front our main street with a large parking lot? Give me a break.
These committees and plans and groups and everything else are a complete joke. I get it - 3 towers as originally proposed isn't sustainable in this market - but 4 stories? That's not sustainable in the sense that our inner city residential developments should be as dense as possible. Blocks away, Portland on the Park is doing a project with 14, 12 and 4 (I believe) story buildings; I love that. 4 stories nearest 1st Ave and the neighborhoods, 12 stories as an overall base with penthouses reaching 13/14 in areas would've been amazing for this lot.
4 stories is simply a joke. The 1 square mile suburb I grew up in outside NYC had higher apartments. Can't wait to hear about their amazing retail offering: a LEASING CENTER (oooh! aaah!) and a FITNESS CENTER (but, wait, it's only for residents). Mixed use density at its finest.