HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction


Two World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5601  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2022, 9:34 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,376
Which leads to the obvious question of why the hell are we still adhering to that ridiculous Libeskind height spiral. Taken out the context of the WTC redevelopment framework, what the downtown skyline needs is to be anchored by a 1,600+ foot tower. This site doesn't need to be saddled by the burden of a symbolic tribute to roof height.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5602  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2022, 9:34 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,040
also for what its worth the 2WTC page on Silverstein's website has recently been locked, only those with a password can now access it. Probably in preparation of an update of the page with these new graphics and renderings.

https://www.silversteinproperties.co...d-trade-center
__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5603  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2022, 9:45 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11 View Post
also for what its worth the 2WTC page on Silverstein's website has recently been locked, only those with a password can now access it. Probably in preparation of an update of the page with these new graphics and renderings.

https://www.silversteinproperties.co...d-trade-center
I really hope that this is the design and not that 1,250’ pile of Pathmark vanilla ice cream that Yimby leaked.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5604  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2022, 2:52 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,784
Wow, that rendering is pretty amazing. Definitely better than Foster and BIG.

Build it, Silverstein! This is the project that will most define his legacy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5605  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2022, 6:40 AM
worldtrade2021 worldtrade2021 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 241
New renderings are apparently from https://maria-farah.com/2WTC as per this link:
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threa...post-177183468

There is the same 2 WTC logo as in this link (which has now been made private): https://www.chloeyae.design/work/2wtc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raysiri View Post
Someone on SkyscraperCity posted a very interesting website: https://www.chloeyae.design/work/2wtc
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC123 View Post
From the renderings it is already going to have a higher roofline than 1WTC, which I find pretty funny.
All the better. The gap in the lower manhattan skyline needs to be filled. The towers will also look a lot more like twins, especially when viewed from the west across the Hudson River.

Credit to skcr for the following images showing the gap that would be filled:




When 2 WTC is around the same height as 1 WTC to the roofline:


The more you think about it, the current 1 WTC has the presence of a lone twin tower standing. It was the twin aspect of the old world trade center that gave it its perceived size.


https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threa...erent.2182590/

Credit to FTL Beach Bum on skyscrapercity for the above render.

No matter what the rebuilding plans are from hereon, it always could have been worse: https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...ticle-1.377512

Last edited by worldtrade2021; Jan 31, 2022 at 6:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5606  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 2:50 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,919
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5607  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 1:19 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
I glanced at the article. I didn’t see a statement as to whether or not there’s confirmation that this is the design. Some of the renderings look official though, like the ones posted below. Further, it seems to parallel the "latest design." If, in fact, what we've seen lately is the new design, I think that it looks amazing.

https://newyorkyimby.com/2022/02/new...-district.html




Last edited by JMKeynes; Feb 1, 2022 at 1:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5608  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 2:29 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
Looks nice. Bundles boxes are a classic look. Let's get vertical already.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5609  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 2:57 PM
worldtrade2021 worldtrade2021 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 241
Hopefully the construction and opening of the nearby Performing Arts Center will renew interest in the site and encourage vertical construction of 2 World Trade Center.

Given the track record of false starts on this building, the truly encouraging signs will not be when official renderings are released nor when news of prospective anchor tenants is heard, but when someone at Silverstein Properties announces an official date for the start of the above ground construction of 2 World Trade Center.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5610  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 3:13 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by worldtrade2021 View Post
Hopefully the construction and opening of the nearby Performing Arts Center will renew interest in the site and encourage vertical construction of 2 World Trade Center.

Given the track record of false starts on this building, the truly encouraging signs will not be when official renderings are released nor when news of prospective anchor tenants is heard, but when someone at Silverstein Properties announces an official date for the start of the above ground construction of 2 World Trade Center.
Since the price of oil has gone through the roof again and is expected to go higher, I can see some Gulf Sovereign Wealth Fund financing this so that it can rise on spec.

I hope that it's got the large hotel component that NY Guy had cited a few months ago from some DoB filing. A smaller office component (i.e., 2m sf v.2.8) makes spec construction much more viable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5611  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 3:15 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Since the foundations, etc. are complete, I wonder how long this will take to build.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5612  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 3:23 PM
worldtrade2021 worldtrade2021 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 241
It appears that the https://maria-farah.com/2WTC site also went private (it now requires a password to submit to view the contents).

This is possibly due to the sensitive nature of the details (i.e. these details are only meant for people behind the scenes and tenants that have insider information, not the general public).

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
Since the price of oil has gone through the roof again and is expected to go higher, I can see some Gulf Sovereign Wealth Fund financing this so that it can rise on spec.

I hope that it's got the large hotel component that NY Guy had cited a few months ago from some DoB filing. A smaller office component (i.e., 2m sf v.2.8) makes spec construction much more viable.
Yes at this point I can't really see construction starting sooner (i.e. before 2023 when the Performing Arts Center is currently expected to be completed and open) than later, outside of significant donations from an outside organization or individual, much like what occurred with the Performing Arts Center in 2016 and then again in 2018.
https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/n...ng-arts-center
https://www.artnews.com/art-news/new...n-grant-11546/

It would make sense that some portion of 2 World Trade Center is allotted to a hotel as a sort of replacement for the Marriott hotel that was on the Old WTC site (even though the Port Authority had relieved Marriott of having to rebuild a hotel for the new WTC complex https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/24/n...nter-site.html). It would be another way to pay a nice homage to the Old WTC site in a way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5613  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 3:24 PM
mfastx mfastx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 298
Looks nice but wake me up when construction resumes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5614  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 3:27 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by worldtrade2021 View Post
It appears that the https://maria-farah.com/2WTC site also went private (it now requires a password to submit to view the contents).

This is possibly due to the sensitive nature of the details (i.e. these details are only meant for people behind the scenes and tenants that have insider information, not the general public).



Yes at this point I can't really see construction starting sooner (i.e. before 2023 with the completion of the Performing Arts Center) than later, outside of significant donations from an outside organization or individual, much like what occurred with the Performing Arts Center in 2016 and then again in 2018.
https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/n...ng-arts-center
https://www.artnews.com/art-news/new...n-grant-11546/

It would make sense that some portion of 2 World Trade Center is allotted to a hotel as a sort of replacement for the Marriott hotel that was on the Old WTC site. It would be another way to pay a nice homage to the Old WTC site in a way.
That the maria-farah website went private indicates that this spectacular design is, in fact, the one we're getting!

If anyone is viewing this at Silverstein Properties, then kudos to Mr. Silverstein and Lord Foster for coming up with an iconic design! Mr. Silverstein is a great New Yorker!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5615  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 4:26 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 395
Hudson Yards comes to the so called World Trade Center. What a crock of shit.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5616  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 4:40 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKeynes View Post
I'm more distracted by what a freaking mess West St is in that view. Why isn't that an underground highway again? In theory could the highway be submerged and still clear the passageways to the WFC? Anyone know?
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5617  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 4:46 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
I'm more distracted by what a freaking mess West St is in that view. Why isn't that an underground highway again? In theory could the highway be submerged and still clear the passageways to the WFC? Anyone know?
I agree, but it's way better than it was before 9/11. That being said, the city should reduce several more lanes of traffic and add more green space. All of those traffic lanes aren't necessary.

Last edited by JMKeynes; Feb 1, 2022 at 4:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5618  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 5:02 PM
Manitopiaaa Manitopiaaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alexandria, Royal Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 494
This isn't the most inspirational tower, but let's at least be grateful we're not getting another Bjarke Ingels barfbag-inducing shitstain of a design. I'll be content if this gets built considering the alternative was a tower that looked like it was falling into 1WTC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5619  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 6:42 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHigher View Post
Hudson Yards comes to the so called World Trade Center. What a crock of shit.

Is that supposed to be a criticism? Because it isn't.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5620  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2022, 7:13 PM
DCReid DCReid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manitopiaaa View Post
This isn't the most inspirational tower, but let's at least be grateful we're not getting another Bjarke Ingels barfbag-inducing shitstain of a design. I'll be content if this gets built considering the alternative was a tower that looked like it was falling into 1WTC.
It seems a little to 'busy' a design to me as if its' trying too hard to be fancy. With 3 and 4 having setbacks and 1 with its trapezoidal side, I actually think a more simple but nice box with perhaps a angled rood like the World Financial Towers or the One Worldwide Tower in Midtown might look better at the site. Perhaps not every building on the site needs to a unique architectural design. I actually thought the complex was too 'busy' architecturally when it was first shown and thought they did not really need to choose separate architects for each building on the site.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:35 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.