HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2022, 9:47 PM
DCReid DCReid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,070
30% of U.S. office buildings, valued at $1.1T, are obsolete

https://www.bisnow.com/chicago/news/...move-in-112258


It is only Tuesday, but it has already been a bad week for Chicago’s Loop office market. Commercial finance research firm Trepp reports the lenders of two significant office buildings have either taken possession of the asset or are on the verge of doing so.

According to Trepp, in November 2021 a $258M loan for Brookfield Asset Management-owned 175 West Jackson Blvd. fell delinquent and was sent to special servicing. This week, citing March servicing data, it reported the 1.4M SF office building’s lender had taken control. And after releasing a warning in December on a $100M loan for 135 South LaSalle St., Trepp now reports the special servicer for the 1.3M SF tower states the most likely outcome is a deed in lieu of foreclosure.

The properties’ troubles could signal a wider problem within Chicago’s Central Business District. Although downtown landlords have so far largely avoided a wave of foreclosures tied to the pandemic, the rise of hybrid work schedules over the past two years has office users rethinking their office strategy, with many now considering either shrinking their footprint or trading up into new spaces more enticing to workers currently at home. As tenants flood into new Class-A office towers in the West Loop, River North and especially Fulton Market, older buildings may find it tough to compete and keep their loans afloat, a pattern seen in other U.S. cities.

About 30% of U.S. office properties, with a total estimated value of $1.1T, face obsolescence as hybrid work entrenches itself into workplace culture.

Last year, 135 South LaSalle lost anchor tenant Bank of America, which occupied more than 800K SF, to a new trophy building at 110 North Wacker Drive. AmTrust Realty, the owner of 135 South LaSalle, plans to spend up to $100M to refurbish and upgrade a 4.7M SF portfolio of downtown Chicago buildings but decided to leave 135 South LaSalle out of the renewal effort, according to a December report in Crain’s Chicago Business.

Brookfield Asset Management bought 175 West Jackson in 2018 for $305M, according to Cook County property records. Once known as the Insurance Exchange Building, it was constructed in 1912 and designed by famed architect Daniel Burnham. It is home to the regional headquarters of the Securities and Exchange Commission and several financial firms, but ownership struggled to fill its floors and service the debt. In 2021, occupancy was 65%, Trepp reported.

Brookfield and LNR Partners, the special servicer for 175 West Jackson, didn't return calls seeking comment.

175 West Jackson isn't a relic. Clayco and the Lamar Johnson Collaborative completed a $100M modernization in 2002, led by architect Lucien Lagrange, that transformed the 22nd floor into a penthouse amenity suite, complete with a full rooftop deck. Tenants have also kept signing deals, including software tech firm WellRight, which last fall agreed to lease 17K SF on the 14th floor, and digital freight broker Loadsmart, which just moved its headquarters from New York to 34K SF in 175 West Jackson.

But it wasn’t sufficient. Due to decreased occupancy and net cash flow, the property’s troubled loan had already hit the watchlist last summer, according to commercial data research firm Reonomy, citing a report from the servicer. The loan was more than 90 days delinquent as of January 2022, with an outstanding balance of $138.7M.

Other Chicago office properties have undergone similar distress. The Civic Opera House Building at 20 North Wacker Drive was hit with a $195M foreclosure lawsuit late last year after the pandemic damaged many of its office tenants, according to a report in Crain’s Chicago Business. In addition, the former owner of 401 South State St, a historic, 487K SF office building, lost control of that property in 2020 after facing a foreclosure lawsuit.

Contact Brian Rogal at brian.rogal@bisnow.com


-------------------------
https://www.bisnow.com/national/news...c-world-112245


Office occupancy continues to rise week-over-week, but at less than 40% of pre-pandemic levels in 10 of the country's largest markets, office owners aren't sleeping soundly just yet. And a new study might have them catching even fewer winks.

As much as 70% of U.S. office buildings face a loss in value in the near future, including roughly 30% of the nation's inventory, or about $1.1T worth at current valuations, facing complete obsolescence, according to a new study by real estate consultancy Zisler Capital Associates.

While that means 30% are safe, another 40% of the office building inventory is marginal, the study says. Many of those properties will need to be sold at prices low enough to justify the capital improvements necessary to bring them up to the energy efficiency and health standards of the near future.

Government energy efficiency standards are getting stricter, but so are tenant demands for healthier and more energy-efficient office environments, the study says. The coronavirus pandemic has helped accelerate the demand for better office space but is only part of the equation.

"While waiting for the pandemic to end, many investors don't recognize that obsolescence is devouring billions from office building values," Zisler Capital co-founder Randall Zisler, who authored the study, said in a statement.

If investors act now, they may be able to avoid this "tsunami" that is impacting office properties worldwide, Zisler added, noting that the UK has already barred leasing of offices that don't meet energy efficiency standards by 2023.

“We’re not saying bulldozers are arriving en masse,” Zisler said. “But you’re going to see a repricing and, in some cases, reuse of these buildings.”

Obsolescence already has created a green premium of 6% for leases in sustainable buildings, Zisler said. And tenants are now willing to pay a health premium, significantly pushing rental rates up over other office space.

Tenants are already leaving older office buildings in favor of newer projects, and the shift has left owners of some aging office buildings with large vacancies and insufficient cash flow to stay current on their debt.

"The problems going forward are going to come from primarily markets that have sizable amounts of dated properties that are not particularly desirable to big drivers of demand these days," Trepp Senior Managing Director Manus Clancy told Bisnow. "You’ll see episodes in New York, Chicago and other places where big buildings that back loans with nine-figure balances become distressed."

Contact Dees Stribling at dees.stribling@bisnow.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2022, 10:02 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,832
the towers being discussed here are giant old early 20th century behemoths:



135 S Lasalle | 1934 | 1.3M SF


source: https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/bui...onal-bank/3149



175 W Jackson | 1912 | 1.4M SF


source: https://www.chicagobusiness.com/arti...ffice-building
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Mar 15, 2022 at 10:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 1:05 AM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
the towers being discussed here are giant old early 20th century behemoths:



135 S Lasalle | 1934 | 1.3M SF


source: https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/bui...onal-bank/3149



175 W Jackson | 1912 | 1.4M SF


source: https://www.chicagobusiness.com/arti...ffice-building

Here I can see Condo, Rentals, and Boutique hotels in the Middle of the Loop. And still retain some small firms that like their location and do not need to be class A offices and like to pay less per sq foot. Think old small lawyer firms that have been in the area for a long time or some other start up that does not require
6 K internet in the next quarter.
The retail of the first levels in the central loop would have to follow to meet the needs of thousands of more residences but cities are always adapting and changing to meet the needs placed in front of it.


Both buildings look like they can have nice penthouses built at 1/8 of NYC or San Fran, just on costs of labor and mostly price of property.


Its been done many times over already.

And would be cheaper renovating the buildings in the same location than a tear down and redoing from scratch. Plus who would ever advocate for something like that, those are irreplaceable and cannot be made today for any cost. The units might be odd but people can be accommodating at a proper price point.


Those buildings cannot be torn town. Its the fabric of the city and its reuse will find value.


A decade ago the Old Post office was declared a building too huge to occupy.

Millions of sq feet. Most thought to make it work half of the building would have to be taken down. Now in retrospect it could have been even larger building with a similar sucess story.

Some of the loop business buildings that took the top spaces condo faced the lake by Grant Park so the views were great and I'm Sure the Monroe make money doing so.


There is no reason these old classic skyscrapers cannot adapt too. They will not be taken down and replaced with something else. Trust me.

Now its full and other buildings are being taken over in the same area expanding even further west into the Fulton Market boomtown.

BTW the original post was very Chicago loop centric, and I don't see other metros that would not be going through the same cycle. IMO this reuse could be a boon to not only the central city but the classic buildings themselves Irregardless if some think of them as obsolete in this day in age.

Last edited by bnk; Mar 16, 2022 at 1:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 7:37 AM
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Loma Linda, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,604
I also agree with the sentiment that converting these buildings into residential or something else is the best bet. Affordable housing at just below market value or luxury for those who want to live in downtown. Landmark them both, if not done already.
__________________
Working towards making American cities walkable again!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2022, 11:36 PM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
the towers being discussed here are giant old early 20th century behemoths:



135 S Lasalle | 1934 | 1.3M SF


source: https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/bui...onal-bank/3149



175 W Jackson | 1912 | 1.4M SF











https://www.chicagobusiness.com/arti...ffice-building


This does not name a buildings but mentions LaSalle st.



https://newsried.com/chicago-convert...to-apartments/

Chicago to Convert Famous Business District Office Buildings to Apartments.

4. October 2022

Chicago is providing financial support to developers willing to convert aging office towers into residential buildings. This is a new program that could become a test case for other cities looking to promote the remodeling of these offices.

City officials last week offered tens of millions of dollars in grants to replace the LaSalle Street corridor, a landmark office complex that has thrived as Chicago’s business hub for decades. announced to be activated. But since the pandemic, the strip’s mostly empty streets and towers have come to symbolize the slow pace of employees returning to office buildings.



...


Still, as the pandemic and new workplace patterns have caused office building prices to plummet, conversion projects are starting to look more attractive to developers.

...

The office transformation is part of a broader revitalization plan for Chicago’s LaSalle Street.


Developers planning to repurpose along Chicago’s LaSalle Corridor will benefit from lower office prices. According to data firm CoStar Inc., three buildings are for sale, and the remaining six or so are either in default on their mortgages or have been foreclosed on.

“We have a very unique opportunity to acquire affordable properties for redevelopment,” said Chicago Deputy Mayor Samir Maekar.

Featured in movies like “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” and “The Untouchables,” LaSalle Street is best known as the historic home of the Chicago Board of Trade and the city’s largest banks and law firms. Even before the pandemic, when some of the larger tenants moved into new buildings along the Chicago River, the Corridor began to decline.


...

The office transformation is part of a broader plan to revitalize Chicago’s LaSalle Street, repurposing the building’s lobby for culture and entertainment, and attracting groceries, restaurants and other residential-oriented retailers. included.

...

Write to Peter Grant at peter.grant@wsj.com.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2024, 5:36 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,832
4 obsolete chicago office towers have now been officially selcted for the mayor's LaSalle Street Reimagined initiative.

All told, these 4 office-to-residential conversions would represent over 1,000 new housing units in the very heart of The Loop along the famed LaSalle Street corridor (AKA "the wall street of the midwest").

Quote:

LaSalle Street Office Conversion Plans Advance For Four Developments

Prime Group aims to invest $203 million in constructing 345 apartments at 111 W. Monroe St, with 105 units designated as affordable. The development plan also includes a 228-room hotel. A $40 million subsidy has been requested for this project.


At 208 S. LaSalle St, Prime Group also proposes $123 million to build 226 apartments, including 84 affordable units. The project has requested a $26.2 million subsidy.


Golub & Company intends to proposes $130 million at 30 N. LaSalle St to create 349 units, with 105 designated as affordable housing. The original proposal featured ground-floor retail, alongside green space. A $57 million subsidy has been requested for this project.


Campari Group’s proposal for 79 W. Monroe St involves $64.2 million to construct 117 apartments, including 41 affordable units. Additionally, the project aims to restore the iconic “Weather Bell” sign that indicates temperature changes. A $28 million subsidy has been requested.
source: https://chicagoyimby.com/2024/04/las...elopments.html
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Apr 5, 2024 at 5:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2024, 2:10 AM
LA21st LA21st is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
4 obsolete chicago office towers have now been officially selcted for the mayor's LaSalle Street Reimagined initiative.

All told, these 4 office-to-residential conversions would represent over 1,000 new housing units in the very heart of The Loop along the famed LaSalle Street corridor (AKA "the wall street of the midwest").


source: https://chicagoyimby.com/2024/04/las...elopments.html
Interesting. I worked at 3On. for 10 years. Strange to think it could be residentlal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2022, 10:05 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
And just like that, we set American downtowns back 30 years.
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2022, 10:10 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxtex View Post
And just like that, we set American downtowns back 30 years.
not necessarily, the market is shifting.

there's still lots of new office development going up and in the works in west loop/fulton market to be closer to the main metra stations.

and as a result of that westward push, some of these older giant central loop office properties are left a bit behind in the dust and can find themselves in white elephant status.

and this shift isn't a covid thing, it's been in place and building steam for the past 2 decades.

covid and WFH are obviously further complicating the picture now, but a central loop office address isn't what it was 40 years ago.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2022, 10:30 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,595
Its a trillion dollar opportunity to remake downtowns.

Lemons to lemonade.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2022, 10:35 PM
TexasPlaya's Avatar
TexasPlaya TexasPlaya is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ATX-HTOWN
Posts: 18,354
This is a pretty big issue in Houston where offices were built in waves during boom/bust periods. All those offices/office parks built in the 70s/80s (and there's a lot) have a very hard time competing with the wave of offices built in the 2000s/2010s.

Fortunately, some of the downtown classics are getting facelifts and upgrades, like this classic gothic one:

Iconic downtown Houston office tower renamed TC Energy Center

__________________
"A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in."

"Such then is the human condition , that to wish greatness for one's country is to wish harm to one's neighbor" Voltaire
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2022, 5:43 AM
Thebestofeverything Thebestofeverything is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasPlaya View Post
This is a pretty big issue in Houston where offices were built in waves during boom/bust periods. All those offices/office parks built in the 70s/80s (and there's a lot) have a very hard time competing with the wave of offices built in the 2000s/2010s.

Fortunately, some of the downtown classics are getting facelifts and upgrades, like this classic gothic one:

Iconic downtown Houston office tower renamed TC Energy Center

I wonder what will happen to all of these buildings from the 70s 80s boom? The energy business now prefers to be in the Energy corridor or up in the Woodlands.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2022, 10:40 PM
llamaorama llamaorama is online now
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,213
I think the extent to this is worrisome depends on what kind of buildings they are. If they are talking about office buildings like a 2-story insurance agency next to a highway exit in Iowa then who cares. I can only imagine if measured as distinct buildings these are a long tail.

However I do worry about larger structures in urban centers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 12:09 PM
Emprise du Lion Emprise du Lion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by llamaorama View Post
However I do worry about larger structures in urban centers.
We're already there in St. Louis. The largest office tower in the entire metro area, and the entire state of Missouri as well, is still sitting vacant in downtown St. Louis.


Source: Loopnet.com

Built in 1986, 909 Chestnut boasts 1.4 million sq ft of space. Deal after deal has fallen through. Current estimates place the buildings value at only $9.2 million. A 95% decline in value since the building was last sold in 2006.

No exact reason has ever been disclosed why deal after deal has fallen through, but the fact that the building is dated and has virtually no attached parking has come up frequently as reasons why. AT&T walked out with the parking garage when they vacated the tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 1:02 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,124
I hope these companies abandoning American downtowns start getting shamed. 1 year ago, were all in this together! One year later, yer downtown is failing? Yeah were outta here! So much for civics.
__________________
Portland!! Where young people formerly went to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 1:14 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,018
Normally I would say convert them to residential, but the floorplates are far too wide. There will be a flood of defaults, a new owner will pick it up for pennies on the dollar, and they'll become the lowest costing lease rates in the city.

WFH is here to stay, and city planners waiting for the glory days of the 80s are going to be waiting a very long time. Residential/mixed-use is gotta be the way going forward or these downtowns will just be dead. Not even 9-5 anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 1:35 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 29,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxtex View Post
I hope these companies abandoning American downtowns start getting shamed. 1 year ago, were all in this together! One year later, yer downtown is failing? Yeah were outta here! So much for civics.
Which companies are abandoning downtowns?

The two chicago pre-war office buildings featured in the article that started this thread have lost tenants to brand new west loop/Fulton market office projects.

now, WFH/hybrid is making it much more challenging for them to refill the vacated space, thus hampering the ability of the owners to payback their hefty loans on them.

This isn't a case of companies abandoning downtowns for suburban office parks like it's the '80s all over again. It's WFH/hybrid making office space in older dinosaur buildings like these worth WAY less than it was when their current owners purchased them pre-pandemic. A painful value adjustment is unfortunately the most likely outcome here.



Quote:
Originally Posted by C. View Post
There will be a flood of defaults, a new owner will pick it up for pennies on the dollar, and they'll become the lowest costing lease rates in the city.
Exactly.

painful adjustment time.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Mar 16, 2022 at 1:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 1:45 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxtex View Post
I hope these companies abandoning American downtowns start getting shamed. 1 year ago, were all in this together! One year later, yer downtown is failing? Yeah were outta here! So much for civics.
I think it's far more likely that those 80's-era sprawl office parks are finished. They were already obsolete pre-pandemic. Now you need a nice, central, amenity-filled office environment. Some highway-adjacent 1980-era lowrise structure doesn't cut it.

My wife's firm, which was mostly in shitty sprawl office buildings, is ending its leases in these buildings and consolidating in higher end, more central buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 1:56 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
I think it's far more likely that those 80's-era sprawl office parks are finished. They were already obsolete pre-pandemic. Now you need a nice, central, amenity-filled office environment. Some highway-adjacent 1980-era lowrise structure doesn't cut it.

My wife's firm, which was mostly in shitty sprawl office buildings, is ending its leases in these buildings and consolidating in higher end, more central buildings.
Exactly! And these shitty office parks are prime candidate to be redeveloped into a better street grid with much needed housing/mixed-use spaces.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2022, 3:36 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 9,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
I think it's far more likely that those 80's-era sprawl office parks are finished. They were already obsolete pre-pandemic. Now you need a nice, central, amenity-filled office environment. Some highway-adjacent 1980-era lowrise structure doesn't cut it.

My wife's firm, which was mostly in shitty sprawl office buildings, is ending its leases in these buildings and consolidating in higher end, more central buildings.
Yep. This was already a trend pre-pandemic, and I don't see why it's not going to continue post-pandemic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxtex View Post
^^^^^Its like the introverts revolt. 10 years from now companies returning downtown will be regarded as heroes saving our beleaguered cities. Its going to be like Detroit all over again, when GM moved downtown out of guilt and the rest of SE Michigan followed.
I don't really think of GM as a downtown Detroit pioneer. GM has been in Detroit since the company moved there from Flint in the 1920s. The more pivotal move was Compuware, which really was a suburban based company that moved downtown. And, for as much damage as he did, Mike Ilitch moving Little Caesars downtown was definitely going against the grain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:00 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.