Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinman
I was going to say that this amount of surface parking should not even be legal.
And I read the bit about being "locked in" to a parking deck as the total BS that it is. This saves the developer money that I doubt they will pass on to renters.
|
The rent here will definitely be cheaper than similarly aged structured parking communities elsewhere, that is the nature of a surface parked community - it is cheaper to build. There is nothing wrong, inherently, with surface parking where appropriate. But the idea that they're holding that space for some future use is laughable. Another thing, unless there was some agreement, which I doubt there is, Alliance and any future owner (should they decide to sell) owns that land. The master developer isn't going to take the land (the surface parking) and redevelop it. Again, their statement is BS and just trying to alleviate any opposition to surface parking that might arise from the community.
Then again, maybe I'm wrong, and part of the contract says they can take the land back should they provide an equal number of spaces in a structured parking deck elsewhere on site, but I would be highly skeptical of such an arrangement.